Leo's Blog: Infinite Insights

Here's a physicist acting like we don't know if the universe is Infinite:

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DYSmcY5h5y9

Of course it is Infinite. We know this perfectly well. Infinite does not just mean infinitely large, it also means infinitely small. You do not need to fly to the edge of observable universe to know that it is Infinite. You can know that just by looking at any square inch of it and realizing that it has infinite resolution. Your pinky finger has infinite resolution. It goes infinitely deep.

The Infinity between 0 through 1 is enough to know that numbers are infinite without having to count up forever. There are an infinite number of numbers between 0 and 1.

Your pinky finger is the 0 through 1 of Infinity. If your pinky is Infinite (and it is), then the universe is Infinite.

Every square inch of the universe is Infinite. Infinite does not mean that there are infinitely many stars in the sky. The number of stars could be finite, I don't know. But it means something far more profound: that each star in itself is Infinite — just like your pinky.

Consciousness has infinite resolution, and the universe is just Consciousness. So of course it is Infinite.

Watch this:

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DWcQxdEDPRJ

Okay, so here's what's wrong with that:

• Reality is of course Eternal. Every moment is Eternal. Eternity is orthogonal to space-time. Space-time takes place inside of Eternity. But it's important to distinguish Reality from the universe. Reality is more fundamental than the concept of universe. Before the Big Bang, Reality still existed.
• The expansion of the stars in no way contradicts an Eternal Reality. Whether the Big Bang is true or not (and that is still an open question), Reality is Eternal. The Big Bang does not contradict or violate Eternity.
• 2nd Law of Thermodynamics is limited human thinking. 2nd Law does not apply to Reality as a whole, only to finite parts. It does not matter how the universe ends because Reality will keep going forever.
• The universe doesn't need an external supernatural creator because the universe IS the supernatural self-creator. The universe just IS what God looks like.
• There is no such thing as a universe, there is only your LIFE, your Consciousness. The universe is content inside of your LIFE. And your LIFE is not a physical object, nor is it a universe.
• Consciousness is eternally old. Consciousness has existed FOREVER! That's why it's God.
• Did the universe have a beginning? Maybe. Either way is fine. But YOU did not have a beginning. YOU have existed forever. The universe's beginning would be inside of YOU, like a movie playing on an Eternal TV set. You aren't a character inside the universe. The universe is the backdrop inside the Eternal TV set of YOU.
• Nothing brings Existence into existence. Existence always exists. Existence is an Absolute. Existence itself cannot have a beginning or start.

Physicist Lawrence Krauss speaking silly things about the origins of the universe.

This is pseudo-science masquerading as science:

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DXz2b_DBpLx

This is like saying that to create eggs from nothing, all you need is a chicken. LOL

You can't just "add gravity into the mix". Gravity is not nothing! Gravity has to be hallucinated, imagined, created! You cannot use gravity to explain how Reality came into existence because Reality exists prior to gravity. Gravity is not fundamental.

This example demonstrates the poor ontological reasoning of physicists. Physcists are not understanding the depth of the ontological problem of getting something from nothing.

The only way to truly get something from nothing is if nothing is Infinity/God! Which, of course, it is. Not gravity. Forget about gravity.

You don't need to create individual particles with impunity, as Krauss says. You create EVERYTHING with impunity!

INFINITY means you get Lawrence Krauss for free! Out of thin air! Via God's Will alone!

The key to solving ontology and the origins problem is to realize that you can just have EVERYTHING for free right from the start. Because no limits exist. Where would the first limit come from? There are no limits in the beginning! In fact, a beginning is a limit, so not even a beginning exists!

Reality has no beginning because it is UNLIMITED.

How many centuries is it going to take physicists to understand this?

No. It's not a "natural miracle". Reality is a Supernatural Miracle.

No, you cannot use the gravitational field to solve ontology. If you are using your mind properly you will understand that. But the physicist is too busy to stop and really think. The gravitational field is a finite thing, which means it could not have created itself. What created gravity? Obviously INFINITY.

"To create stuff you don't need stuff, you just need quantum mechanics."

No. The only way to create stuff is by first having INFINITY. Quantum mechanics did not create Reality. Quantum mechanics cannot create stuff because it is stuff.

How come I — a non-scientist — understand this shit and an MIT educated physicist doesn't? Because I took meta-science seriously and he didn't. Why did I take it seriously and he didn't? Because I actually cared about understanding Reality. Yes, it is that simple. The purity of your intention matters. If you actually cared about understanding Reality you wouldn't be a physicist, you'd be a philosopher. Physicists don't ask deep enough questions to ever understand Reality. Because they are too busy doing physics! How sick is that? These days you gotta be a non-physicist just to understand that physics is stupid.

No physicist understands what is time, space, gravity, energy, matter, force, distance, charge, observers, life, death, consciousness, sanity, mind, memory, self, other, love, thought, truth, rationality, color, sound. Physicists don't even understand nothing! They know less than nothing. And yet, rockets can still fly to the moon. Isn't that amazing? That's how twisted this shit is. That is the magic of science.

Awareness of how your mind works is not technically science, however, no science can be trusted without it. Science assumes a properly functioning mind, which no one has without decades of non-scientific work. Mastering your mind is not part of science, but without it there can be no science. Science is nothing more than a sub-set of mind. But science is arrogantly disinterested in truly understanding the mind because that’s not “scientific”. This is the stupidity of science. If you were truly intelligent you would instantly understand that before doing any science you first have to master your mind, which requires years of serious but non-scientific work.

Of course, you could re-frame mastering the mind as scientific work, (which would be the proper course), but scientists are too closedminded to do that. Materialist scientists cannot allow mastering the mind to be re-framed as scientific work because that would open the door the “woo” that they have attached their identity to demonizing and ridiculing.

It makes no difference how many lab experiments you complete, how many papers you publish, how many academic prizes you win, or how many large particle colliders you build — none of that moves you closer to mastering your mind. The mind that you are using every day to do your fucking science!

How can science be pure when the lens on the instrument is so filthy from neglect?

It is not merely that science neglects to clean the instrument. The problem is much worse. It's that science is an ideology that rationalizes and normalizes why the instrument should not be cleaned. Science demonizes the cleaning of the instrument! Because science is the dirt that would be cleaned away. The dirt it crafty. It doesn't want to be cleaned away. It clings for its life. Falsehood will not die quietly. It will kick and scream all the way.