Leo's Blog: Infinite Insights

Relativity & bias:

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DcSegvhose6

The following requires high intellectual maturity to understand, so be careful:

What women don’t understand about men, is that many men do not think that rape is wrong. The notion that rape is wrong simply does not exist in many men’s minds. For such men, rape is cool. Women do not want to believe that men could be this low — but many are. But when you ask such a man publicly, of course he will pretend like rape is wrong. But in his own mind, he does not think it is wrong, because all he’s thinking about is maximizing sex. This is the actual reason why rape is so common. If a man thought that rape was wrong, he would never rape a woman. Men don’t rape women by accident. Such men even believe that rape is good for women. Because you define good relative to yourself. Rape is good for many men. Some men even believe women secretly love rape; that rape is doing a woman a favor. The simple reason many men don't consider rape wrong is because they struggle getting sex as it is. This is difficult for a woman to understand because women assume sex is easy. Men have an entitlement to sex. Of course that's delusional, but millions of men are delusional.

This idea of “consent”, you must remember, is a very recent, modern invention. Women like to pretend that consent is an objective thing. It is not. You invented the idea of consent. For many men across the world, your idea of consent simply does not exist. Many men do not believe that women have any right to consent. That is because all human rights are invented. Humans have no rights. The only rights you have is the ones you’ve invented and convinced others are real, which is why humans deny that human rights are invented. You don’t want to admit that human rights are invented because that is too dangerous for you. But the truth is, every human right is an invention. But the problem is, people then start to feel entitled to human rights. That is the error. Progressives and leftists are in denial of this because they have brainwashed each other into believing that they are entitled to all sorts of wild things. No, you aren’t. But you insist on telling yourselves you are.

Just because you think rape is wrong, does not mean that others agree, or that it is wrong. Beware of your own bias on this matter. Just because you are biased against rape does not mean your bias is true or universal. You do not even have the right to your own body and life. You do not have a right to live. The only reason you say you have a right to life is because you have an ego that is terrified of death. When you understand this, you will appreciate life much more because you will stop taking it for granted. Appreciate that most living organisms have no rights. Contemplate what a right is and where it came from.

Watch this and contemplate it too:

https://www.instagram.com/reel/Ddye1aUI2l_

To understand this, you have to stop morally judging it. If you insist on moralizing, you will not understand.

Everything I said above applies to every other crime, law, and right that human beings have invented, assume, and take for granted: theft, murder, violence, genocide, war, slavery, pedophilia, tax evasion, bestiality, cannibalism, traffic laws, free speech, international law, pollution, drugs, all regulation, etc. This is why crime exists and refuses to disappear. This is also why corporations and elites are so difficult to regulate. What humans do not generally understand is that "crime" has to be invented in the mind, otherwise it does not exist. There is no crime for chimpanzees because they have not invented it. A chimpanzee does not understand what rape is. And millions of men are not much wiser than chimpanzees, haha.

Note: This is not a justification for any bad behavior or undoing of human rights. I generally support the legal system. But when bad behavior happens to you, I want you to understand why it happens. It happens because human rights are a fiction that many others do not share. This is not a right-wing position, this is actually a left-wing position. Do not strawman what I said here.

Have I read the Bible? No.

Have I read the Koran? No.

Why not?

Because I don’t need to. Because I don’t want to pollute my mind with human noise. I understand God deeper and clearer than any scholar or religious fundamentalist who has studied the Bible for years. Case in point, Jordan Peterson. Why? Direct experience. Nothing beats direct experience. The only reason people revere and read those books is out of conformity. It's all just conformity. This is counter-intuitive because academics and intellectuals want to gaslight you that you need to read these important books, these pillars of civilization and history. No! You don’t. The only reason to read those books is entertainment. Those books will not help you understand God. Just the opposite, they will fill your head with absurd human ideas about God. Every minute you spend reading the Bible is a minute lost not experiencing God.

Notice, the only reason those books are deemed important is conformity and cultural narcissism. There is no other reason. The only reason humans think those books are important is because everyone else does. Bible studies are a circle jerk. You are not questioning if the Bible is truly important. You’re just assuming. If you want to read the Bible for fun, fine, but don’t kid yourself that it gets you to God. The Bible gives you neither the epistemic tools nor an accurate description of God, nor does the Bible make you moral. The Bible is a caveman’s understanding of God. That’s why it is so bigoted. God doesn’t punish anyone, God doesn’t test anyone, God doesn't judge anyone, God doesn't abandon anyone, God doesn't send anyone to Hell, and there is nothing special about Jesus, Mohammad, Christianity, Jews, Islam, or humans. All of that is human ignorance. The Bible is spiritual pornography. It's not even real pornography, it's cartoon pornography featuring humanoid animals.

Keep in mind that the more spiritual books you read, the more your mind will operate on spiritual group-think. To take the Bible seriously is already a trap. You cannot trust anything the Bible says. You cannot even trust that Jesus was real. It's just a human story. If you actually knew God you would not care about the Bible more than a comic book.

"But Leo! Wouldn't your understanding of God be more complete if you were just more humble and read the Bible?"

No.

God is so far beyond the Bible that the Bible is irrelevant.

Open your mind to the possibility that you don't need the Bible at all. Think of it like this: Do alien species need the Bible to know God? Obviously not. Are they missing something important for not having access to the Bible? Obviously not. Thinking that the Bible is so important that everyone needs to read it, is just mindless cultural narcissism. Beware, cultured and sophisticated people will try to gaslight you on this because they have nothing better to do. They need to justify their overpriced education. They need to believe that going to Yale and studying the Bible made them more intelligent. Lol.

Stop. Taking. Human. Consensus. Seriously.

Think. For. Yourself. << that's how you reach God.

- - - - - - - - -

Note: Don't get me wrong, there are a few valuable phrases and ideas in the Bible. But no more-so than you will find in any modern spiritual book. But defenders of the Bible will cling to those few phrases like a security blanket. I post more valuable insights about God in one week on this blog than everything found in the Bible. I know, I know, you're not allowed to say such things. But what did you expect from a book written by bigoted cavemen? A caveman cannot understand God. His development level is too low. It's not because I am some genius, it's because I'm 2000 years more developed. That's a lot. A caveman does not have my education, and education matters. A caveman never accessed 5-MeO-DMT. Humans understood almost nothing 2000 years ago. So why are you reading books written by cavemen and taking them so seriously? That's not the caveman's error, that's your error. Even a caveman would understand that you shouldn't take a caveman's book seriously if you got books that are 2000 years more advanced.

The absurd irony in all this is that if a smart caveman was teleported to our time, he himself would say, "You guys are fucking crazy for taking my book so seriously given how much more advanced you are today. Let me get this straight, you guys launch rockets to the moon and you still take my book seriously? What the fuck is wrong with you? My book was just the best I could muster as a caveman. We owned slaves, raped women, stoned gays, and genocided races. Move on. Don't live in the past."

Imagine this: Today you are given access to a spiritual book from the year 4000. Should you read that book or today's book? Human understanding evolves and advances. You want to be reading the cutting edge.

I'm just talkin' common sense here, but it's so controversial and taboo. Why? Maybe cause it's true?

Peter Ralston's The Book Of Not-Knowing is worth 100 Bibles. But no one even knows it exists. That's how silly humanity is.

This guy clinically died after getting hit by a car. Listen to him describe death:

https://www.instagram.com/reel/Dd-E0woJZAz

What he calls "home" is Infinity. It's Everything/Nothing/Truth/God/Love/Self/Infinity/Source/Formlessness.

When you die, your consciousness becomes Infinite, you become God.

Death is you literally becoming Everything. You go from being something to dissolving into Everything.

This is the entire point of spirituality, and how real spirituality differs from fake spirituality. Fake spirituality is beliefs, theories, and science. Real spirituality is dying and knowing for certain what death is. Knowing death is what gives you true confidence and security. It isn't fake because you actually know because you went through it. Notice that you cannot use science to know death, because death obviously transcends science. All of science assumes and presupposes life. That's a huge limitation and bias!

This is not a "near death experience". I am talking about actually understanding what death is, metaphysically. Death is Infinity.

Note: Do not harm yourself. I am just explaining how stuff works. And you don't know yet if what I'm saying is true. What if I'm wrong? You can't just believe me, you gotta verify it for yourself. This is not a matter of dogma, this requires Awakening. The point of genuine spirituality is to realize that there is no such thing as non-existence. You always exist, it's just a question of, in what form? When you turn the channel off on the TV, the TV still exists. The TV is Eternal.

You do not have to physically die to understand what death is. You can do it through Awakening. Which is what every genuine guru has done across history.

Today is his birthday. Happy birthday to Me.

This lady's analysis is a good example of rationalism. Her whole shtick is using rationalism to demystify spirituality, to rid spirituality of nonsense, which is, of course, itself nonsense. You can't use science to frame spirituality because spirituality is prior to science.

(Start at timestamp 24:55)

My commentary:

• Doing a scientific study on experiences of God by using Evangelical Christians is already stupid and wrong. Evangelical Christians are deluded dogmatic bigots. Of course they don't understand God. Why would you assume otherwise? That nullifies the entire study. That is like trying to understand love by interviewing psychopaths.
• She fundamentally misunderstands what experience of God is. Experience of God is not a subjective experience. It is absolute.
• "I 100% believe that when you are talking to that God, that experience is real, but it still doesn't mean, when it comes to metaphysical truth claims, that you are talking to true gods and aliens." That is wrong. That's exactly what it means. The sickness here is that she's speaking about truth and metaphysics, but she's not doing any metaphysics, she's just parroting science. The point is not that you merely experience "god", the point is that you actually do metaphysics and you have truthful insight into what the correct metaphysics is. Realizing God IS the solution of metaphysics. It means you've solved metaphysics.
• "Not all people who talk to God can be right." Of course. This is a bad point because not all scientists can be right either. When it comes to understanding God, 99% will be wrong. Just as 99% of children doing quantum mechanics will be wrong. So what? You have to stop talking to fools and only talk to the people who actually understand God. Imagine if I tried to debunk science by only talking to kids in a 1st grade science classroom, I ask them some questions, they give me some stupid answers, so I conclude that science is false. That is what scientists do with mysticism, and they dare to call this scientific method.
• "People who had unusual or strange experiences, but retained that uncertainty about their interpretation, were doing better mentally." This is a mistake. Who cares what average people are doing or how they are feeling? A genuine experience of God is not an interpretation, but science is interpretation. As long as you "retain uncertainty" then you cannot know what God is. This is a classic mistake that scientists make, they think about truth in probabilities, but Truth is not probabilistic. So, ironically, scientific thinking is being used to delude oneself about God. If Christians can have wrong interpretations, then so can scientists, but this is lost on scientists. Key insight: Scientific interpretations of mystical experience are wrong and delusional. Science does not even understand what a mystical experience is. But science is certain that it's interpretation of mysticism is true, which it isn't, so they commit the very error they are criticizing.
• "Your brain created a God". No. God is hallucinating your brain. "The danger is your brain created the god and you forget that your brain created the god." No. God created your brain and you forget that you are God.
• She has mistaken spirituality for cool tricks the brain does to help her survive, rather than as Truth and an actual solution to metaphysics.
• She is misusing the notion of "epistemic humility". She is trying to be so humble that she's unwittingly using humility to deny Truth. Truth cannot exist for you if you have programmed yourself to believe that "I must always be humble". You should be humble until you actually become conscious of Truth, and then you must accept that Truth as absolute. And if you can't do that, you've used science to delude yourself. Notice that in science you do not say, "Well, I see the Earth is round, but I must be humble and not convince myself the Earth is round." No. The Earth is round, period. If you act too humble to say the Earth is round, you've deluded yourself.
• "Once I make that distinction that we can value the experience without getting stuck in the trap of: therefore I know my experience is capital-R Real, then we can steal the technology." This is a total corruption and perversion of spirituality. Spirituality is not a technology to help you survive, spirituality is about getting to the absolute bottom of what is capital-R Real. Real spirituality is when you know for sure what is Real and what is not, not because you believe in something, but because you believe in nothing and you are conscious of Truth itself.
• It is so ironic that she is trying to rid spirituality of bullshit, but she turned spirituality into bullshit by "having fun" and using this "technology" to feel good. Spirituality is NOT a set of tricks to make yourself feel good! That's a corruption of spirituality. She is trivializing truth-seeking. Spirituality is about real truth-seeking, which ends in you finding the fucking TRUTH.
• "I don't believe I'm talking to anything supernatural". That's the problem. Her rationalist mind is bigoted against the possibility of a real supernatural. That is unscientific. If she was truly scientific and rational she would be open the supernatural without always needing to rationalize it away as human delusion. She just assumes that the supernatural cannot be real. But there's nothing scientific or rational in that assumption. That's an empirical question that requires empirical investigation.
• "God is just your own brain". No. That's not what God is at all.
• What I am against is the trivialization of spirituality by making it into "cool experiences" which say nothing about Reality itself. If your spirituality does not give you genuine insight into metaphysics, it's fake. Why? Because "cool experiences" cannot truly solve anything or save you. The only thing that is worth anything, the only thing that saves you, the only thing that has the power to liberate and transform you, is TRUTH. Not experiences, not cool ideas, not theories, not science, not rationality, but TRUTH. All of the power of spirituality lies in the fact that you've hit the actual TRUTH. And if you're uncertain about that, then you haven't hit actual TRUTH and so your existential condition has not changed. You will die like a dog, just like everyone else. But TRUTH makes you Immortal! The entire point of spirituality is to actually realize that you are Immortal. If you are uncertain about that, then you ain't Immortal, are you? This is the difference between real spirituality and self-help. This lady as turned spirituality from Immortality to self-help.
• She calls it, "truth-claims nonsense", but her non-truth-claims are the nonsense.
• "It's not magic". Yes it is, but since she's not Awake, she doesn't see the magic of Being.
• If you reduce all mystical and spiritual experience to mere brain states, out of bigotry, you've completely misunderstood spirituality.
• God is not a Lord of the Rings character.
• She is trying to turn spirituality into mere psychology. To her, spirituality is just a bunch of interesting psychological tricks, it is not existential. This is a deep mistake. Immortality is not a psychological trick. The psychological trick is convincing yourself that Immortality is nothing more than a psychological trick.
• "Death is sitting across from you". The point of spirituality is to realize that there is no such thing as death. Death is the self-deception spirituality is meant to cure you of.
• Important point: despite everything I said, I am not claiming Bashar the alien is real. She may be right that Bashar is fake. But Bashar's status is a distraction from realizing you are God.
• God IS Imagination. That's what she's not seeing.
• "I'm entirely science-driven with all of this". That's the problem right there. She thinks that's a virtue. Why does she think that? Group-think, culture, lack of questioning assumptions, taking science for granted, shallow epistemology.
• She is trying to use science to frame spirituality, but that's an epistemic error because spirituality is the realization that Reality has no frame.
• Now perhaps you can appreciate why I went to such lengths in Deconstructing Rationality. So that you don't get bamboozled by these slippery rationalists. Rationalists are too smart to buy religion, but not smart enough to understand mysticism.
• If this lady actually realized God, she would shit her pants in horror and run to the doctor for meds. Then she would run to a scientist to reassure her that science is real. And then she would dismiss the whole event as her brain misfiring.
• God is not something you talk to. God is Reality itself.
• This is why you need a serious teacher to do real spirituality. If you are unserious, you will end up falling for this kind of scientific slop spirituality. You will not reach God without a serious approach. This is also why I am serious and rude, to preempt this shallow slop. I am blunt because otherwise you will end up with a nice lady like Britt, but she isn't serious enough to cut through all the human bullshit.

This whole video is a great example. I love it because it demonstrates how deep self-deception goes. Notice that she plays the role of someone who is supposed to be the cure to spiritual self-deception, but everyone who takes her explanations seriously will end up as self-deceived as her. As I've said elsewhere, the cure is the disease.

The bottom line is: do not allow scientific bigots to gaslight you into trivializing spirituality. Real spirituality is more true than science.

Thanks to forum member Natasha Tori Maru for sharing this video.

Note: Nothing personal against Britt. I'm sure she's a decent person, I just use her as an educational example of the traps in this work.

This is what self-inquiry feels like. At the center of your head, is an infinite void. That's Infinity/God. Behind your human costume is an Infinite I, the I of God.

This is a chunk from the book I am writing:

All human intuition is trained on, and for, dealing with finite objects. But Reality as a whole is not a finite object. So human intuition fails when reasoning about Reality as a whole. Perhaps the biggest mistake of science is assuming that finite rationalistic intuitions apply to Reality as a whole. All scientific intuition is finite. Reality is Infinite. That’s why science is stuck. Scientists have no problem accepting that human intuition does not apply at the quantum scale. To a simple-minded person, quantum mechanics is irrational nonsense because he is judging it using intuitions built on experience of classical mechanics. But scientists have a huge problem accepting that human intuition does not apply at the Infinite scale. The logic of Infinity is weirder than quantum mechanics. But scientists mistake that as evidence of its irrationality and therefore unreality. No. No. No. Just because it violates your finite intuitions does not mean it’s unreal. Scientific intuition tells you that Reality can’t be mystical or magical, but that’s wrong because that intuition was built from dealing exclusively with finite objects. Finite objects don’t have magical qualities, but Infinity must be magical. That’s not irrational and that’s not unscientific. The scientific mind cannot wrap itself around Infinity like it can with everything else. But scientists have been wrapping themselves around finite objects for so long, with such success, that they have become arrogant and taken for granted that nothing else exists. But something else does exist. Reality as a whole is of such a radically different nature than what scientists are used to dealing with that science cannot wrap itself around it. Science can wrap itself around parts of Reality, but not the whole of Reality, because — obviously — Reality precedes science.