Leo's Blog: Infinite Insights

My claim is that science is bigoted. What is this bigotry? Science is bigoted against the supernatural, mystical, and infinite. My challenge to every scientist is this: How do you know that science is not simply bigoted? Who did you ask? Science? Can you see that this must be a meta-scientific issue? Because if what I say it true, if science is bigoted, then you cannot ask science to answer this question due to conflict of interest. Of course if you ask any bigot whether he’s a bigot, he will deny it. “But Leo! Prove to me scientifically that science is bigoted.” No! That means you aren’t seeing the depth of the problem. Whether or not science is bigoted cannot be answered by science, it must be answered from beyond science. Which demonstrates why you can’t have proper science without considering factors beyond science. When science says, “Science is all you need to understand reality. Nothing else is needed beyond science.” That is bigotry! But science refuses to recognize its own bigotry because it is bigoted. All I am trying to do is help science see its own bigotry. But of course, this means I will be gaslit by the bigots.

The challenge is this: How do we get every scientist in the world to recognize that science is spiritual bigotry? Do you see that recognizing this requires something more than science?

This is what I mean when I say meta-science is more important than science. First we must get our meta-science right, then we can go on to do proper science. But that is not how today's scientists operate. Today's scientists are too busy and too arrogant to care about meta-science. All I'm trying to do is show you the importance of meta-science. But when I do that scientists perceive me as their enemy. Because meta-science genuinely threatens the authority of science. The one thing science cannot stand is having its authority undermined. But that's exactly what is needed to advance science to the next developmental stage. Ironically, the one trying to make science better the most is the one who will be attacked and gaslit the hardest. This is why scientific progress takes centuries. Science can only advance as fast as bigots die. Sadly, it is easier to wait for bigots to die than to cure them of their bigotry.

Do you see the problem that bigotry cannot be cured with facts and logic? If science is truly bigoted as I claim, then you can't cure that by presenting a scientific argument. No amount of research papers cure bigotry. How do you cure a bigot? How do you prove to a bigot that he's a bigot? Realizing you're a bigot requires an awakening, which requires deep philosophical self-reflection, which science denies is needed in science.

The problem with arguing with scientists about God is that you are not arguing against a position which was rationality or scientifically adopted. You are arguing with bigotry, which is why you can never win no matter how good your argument is. When you argue with a scientist, you are arguing against an unfalsifiable position. Science is unfalsifiable. Not because it is true, but because it is bigotry.

By the way, look up the definition of bigotry.

Scientific bigotry is not an oxymoron. Scientists were bigots throughout history and they are still bigots today. Yes, it is bigotry to a priori deny all mystical experience. That is as bigoted as denying the data produced by microscopes and telescopes. I can't believe I have to explain this. I would hope all this is obvious to a scientist.

If science stops being bigoted, I will stop criticizing science. Isn't that fair? What I've been criticizing this whole time is not science but bigotry. But scientific people have confused bigotry with science. We must clear up this confusion to advance as a species. That is why I talk about science so much.

Philosophy is really just science of your own mindspace. That is why it works. It works because you are observing real ways the mind works. Philosophy turns your own mind into a laboratory. That is why philosophy cannot be distinguished from science. You can’t separate philosophy from science because science requires understanding your own mind. You cannot do valid science without understanding your own mind. The deeper you understand your own mind, the deeper science you can do. But scientists don’t understand this. They think science is so objective that it doesn’t require awareness of the mind at all. That is insanely naive. That means science will not develop sufficient construct-awareness to understand itself. The biggest problem with science is lack of construct-awareness, which comes from separating science from philosophy, psychology, introspection, and spirituality. Rationalist scientists have foolishly convinced each other that removing the mysticism from science makes science better, more rigorous, more true, but in fact it makes science dumb by cutting science off from its own source: MIND.

The core problem for science is this: MIND is inherently supernatural and mystical, but science a priori denies that anything can be supernatural or mystical. In order to make that a priori dogma seem to hold, science has to reject deep introspection and self-reflection as part of science, since if it was embraced by science it would reveal that science is MIND and MIND is supernatural and mystical. Science has painted itself into a corner by closing its mind to the possibility that MIND could be supernatural and mystical. It is in fact unscientific to believe that MIND cannot be supernatural and mystical. That is nothing more than a dogma and a prejudice. If the mind is used properly, then it will have no bias against the supernatural and mystical. If the mind is used improperly, it will have a bias against the supernatural and mystical, while calling itself objective and rational.

Rationality is fully compatible with the supernatural and mystical. Of course it is. Because rationality is a function of MIND, and MIND is supernatural/mystical because MIND is Infinite. Science is in denial about its own Source. Science has severed itself from its Source. Science is the spiritual disease of an overly unholistic, analytical mind. But culture and group-think has normalized this disease and even placed it on a pedestal as the highest form of intelligence. This is embarrassingly wrong. The highest form of intelligence would never cut itself off from its Source.

From now on, every time you hear a rationalist scientist talking, just remind yourself that this is a mind so prejudiced and arrogant that it has cut itself off from its Source, and is proud of it.

I don't like making predictions, but I predict that the AI bubble is going to pop. So watch out. Don't lose your pants. Many people are going to get hurt. This AI bubble is collective madness. People are drunk on AI fantasies.

At this point all the tech companies are in so deep, nothing they say or do can be trusted. At this point they have a loaded gun to their head. They will say and do anything. They will lie, cheat, steal, bribe, break laws, buy politicians, fudge numbers, distort, and manipulate just to stay alive. Do not trust anything that is said about AI by people making AI. They are all compromised and drunk on Silicon Valley group-think.

This AI crash will go down in history as the perfect example of why developing autonomy of mind is so important. When your mind works autonomously you become immune to collective madness.

Note: My predictions are not guarantees. My predictions can be wrong. So take that into account. I am making educated guesses.

What scientists call hallucination is when Mind becomes so fluid that its thoughts and desires start to get reflected in physical reality. For example, when you imagine a demonic face and you see a demonic face materialize on the wall. This is not a mistake or a mental disorder. This is the true nature of Mind. Mind materializes its will directly as the physical world, because the physical world has always been the Mind's hallucination.

What scientists don't understand is that demonic faces appearing on the wall is not delusion, demonic faces can appear on the wall because ontologically the wall is made out of Everything/Infinity, which includes demonic faces. Yes, your wall is made out of demons and unicorns. Again, this is not irrational, this is not unscientific, this is trans-rational. The difference between a demon and wall is imaginary. I'm serious. You can become so Awake that you will see the walls of your house are made out of demons and unicorns. That's ontological relativity.

Note: No, I do not suffer from any mental illness or disorder. My mind is crystal clear, coherent, rational, stable. I am just explaining the ontology of Consciousness, which scientists should have explained to you in grade school, but they were too epistemically irresponsible.

I've said before that the most conscious, selfless, loving, and mystical humans were killed off long ago by the most selfish. Well, here's a perfect example of how such selection works:

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DYmN_fPNMYr

Today's humans are spiritual black frogs, after millennia of wars and genocides. That's why we still live in the spiritual Dark Ages. But scientists have wrongly taken this darkness as proof that God does not exist. Ha! This is just a temporary Dark Age. The light frogs will reemerge once the dust settles.

Bonus: Wait? Does this mean black people have radiation immunity? Then everyone in Fallout should be black. Haha! Does this mean that after WW3 there will only be black people?? That alone should be enough to turn white supremacists into nuclear abolitionists. That explains why black don't crack. LOL