Leo's Blog: Infinite Insights

There are some funny and interesting contradictions here:

It is funny when you realize that every Christian alive today would have been killed by the Christians from 1000 years ago for being heretics. Christians cannot even clear their own bar, because their bar was nonsense to begin with. Every Christian today is a heretic by ancient standards. Today’s Popes would be burned at the stake as heretics not long ago.

Catholics cannot even agree amongst themselves on who the real Popes are! That's how bullshit Catholicism is.

Every Christian is like a criminal brought into an FBI interrogation room. The agent asks basic questions as the criminal twists himself into pretzels to tell a coherent story. The criminal keeps contradicting himself and making shit up on the fly, stumbling over simple details, but it's not fooling anyone. It's obvious to any outside observer that the story is bullshit. Isolate any two Christians into two separate rooms and they won't be able to keep their stories straight, because they made it up.

Christianity is evil because it usurps your divine sovereignty as God. The Christian church literally stole God’s sovereignty for itself. Whenever anyone tells you that you must listen to a higher authority rather than yourself, they are a devil stealing God’s authority from you. The only true religion is the one that tells you that you are God and that your own consciousness is the highest authority there is. By definition, every church is evil because it usurps God’s authority. No church has any authority whatsoever. All church authority was always a human fiction invented by idiots who never knew God. You are God. No church can ever have authority over your Mind, unless you are foolish enough to give it to them, which is exactly what they are counting on. Unless you personally given a church your divine authority, it has none.

The very idea that any organization, any church, any bishop has spiritual authority over you, is blasphemy. No human institution can have authority over God. That's pure nonsense. Mind is sovereign, ontologically. The reason that all churches disagree and splinter is because they never had authority to begin with. All church authority is fabricated and only minds of low intelligence surrender their authority to human fabrication. When God lacks consciousness, God can be tricked into surrendering its authority to some human institution because God does not know better. The church uses God's youthful ignorance and naivete against him, to hijack his authority for themselves to spread evil across the land. The church brainwashes children (God) to relinquish all their authority to the church. If that's not evil, nothing is.

Now, imagine someone wrote this post 500 years ago. I would be killed just for telling you the truth, for telling you how God actually works. Which is why Christianity is evil.

Christians are lucky that there is no Hell, as they would all belong in it for their crimes. Stealing a child's mental sovereignty is no better than rape. Christianity is spiritual rape of children. Let that sink it. Catholics rape God every day and call it Good. Yeah... That's how ugly truth gets.

Imagine realizing that you spiritually raped your own children. That's the real spiritual work none of these clowns dare to do.

The funny thing is how viciously Christians treat their own kind, their own reformers. The purest and most intelligent Christians were killed and demonized by mainstream Christians, which is all you really need to know about who Christians are at heart. As soon as you disagree with them, Christians want to kill you because their mind cannot handle relativity and multiple perspectives.

Makes you wonder: If God/Truth is Unity itself, how come Christians are so divided?

Christian: "I’m a Christian so as a Christian I get to define what true Christianity is and who counts as a true Christian."

Non-Christian: "No you don’t. If you can call yourself a Christian, then I have as much right to call myself a Christian as you. You can define Christianity however you want, and I can define Christianity however I want. If your definition can exclude me from being a Christian, then my definition can exclude you from being a Christian. I can worship dinosaurs and call that Christianity and there is nothing you can do about it."

Christian: "Nonsense! Worshiping dinosaurs is not true Christianity."

Non-Christian: "Of course you’d say that because you’re not a true Christian. A true Christian knows that dinosaur-worship is essential to Christianity."

Christian: "But Jesus never said anything about dinosaurs!"

Non-Christian: "Jesus never said anything about Christianity, churches, the Bible, abortion, or the Pope either. And you have no idea what Jesus actually said. In my Bible it says that Jesus said that Christians must worship dinosaurs."

Christian: "But that's not the real Bible!"

Non-Christian: "Your Bible is not the real Bible. Jesus appeared to me in a vision and told me that your Bible was written by Satan to mislead gullible humans."

Christian: "But that's just nonsense you made up!"

Non-Christian: "No more-so than what you believe."

Christian: "No way! My Christianity is the real one."

Non-Christian: "That's why we must kill all of you heretics until only dinosaur-worshiping Christians remain. Jesus told me that all of you fake non-dinosaur Christians are going to dinosaur-Hell away."

Christian: "But that's just some crazy hallucination you had!"

Non-Christian: "God means that everything is a hallucination."

- - - - - - -

The Christian does not have enough intelligence to understand that he has no more right to define Christianity than anyone else. Literally anyone can define Christianity however they want. The only limit is what you’re able to convince yourself of. The Christian has convinced himself that he gets to decide what Christianity is while denying this privilege to everyone else.

The reason it works this way is because "Christianity" is an invented category. Literally you invented Christianity. Anyone can re-invent Christianity at any time however they want. This isn't theoretical, this has happened thousands of times within Christianity. Because Christianity is invented. There is no such thing as the "true" "original" invention. Christianity is whatever enough people say it is. I could start a dinosaur branch of Christianity tomorrow and it would be better than any Christianity that currently exists. No way? Yes way!

This is why Christians hate relativity. Relativity destroys the possibility of a simplistic one true faith. Relativity breaks the Christian's brain. This is also why religion must be dogmatic. If religion was not dogmatic it would splinter into a thousand different directions to suit the individuals' survival. This is why religion uses force, coercion, persecution, punishment, demonization, excommunication, government, propaganda, and brainwashing to sustain itself. Without those devilish tactics there could not be a monolithic religion. A monolithic religion is created by killing and demonizing everyone who disagrees with you until there is no one left to say otherwise. Christianity is evil because it is an unconscious system of survival whose #1 priority is to defend and reproduce itself.

Think about it, who gets to define what Christian means? People will naively say, "Christians, of course." But no. It can't work that way because this begs the question. Why should Christians get to define what Christianity is? What if they define it wrong? Who says their self-definition is the right one? If their definition is wrong then they were never Christians in the first place. So thanks to relativity, even defining Christianity is impossible because there is no objective way to agree on who a true Christian is. But Christians are so simple-minded and irresponsible that this issue does not even bother them.

Here's the key insight on this: A non-Christian can define Christianity better than a Christian because there is no way to know that the Christian is actually a true Christian, while the non-Christian can be more Christian than the Christian. This is why Christians don't do epistemology, since it would undermine their position of being true Christians. The Christian has no way of knowing which version of Christianity is correct. And notice that every branch of Christianity thinks itself to be the one true church, but they have no way of knowing that.

No, there does not need to be a boundary between true and false Christianity because you never knew that true Christianity was true to begin with. Just because someone says, "This is the true Christianity", does not make that true. "But there has to be some original Christianity." No, there doesn't. It could all be made up from day one. You don't know otherwise.

The best way to know that epistemic anarchy is real is to just look at all the sects and splinters of any major religion. Christians themselves cannot agree with each other, cannot keep their stories straight. Christianity is an epistemic cluster-fuck. They just believe whatever is convenient to their survival at the point in time and space that they find themselves in. It is bullshit on top of bullshit on top of bullshit on top of bullshit.

The far-right Zionists in Israel are a good case-study in the evils of self-bias. Israel is a sick country to allow such extremists to run the government. These extremists are certainly genocidal, even if the general citizenry are not, but extremists have a disproportional influence in the government. Government by extremists never ends well. Extremists thrive in war and violence. They love it. There cannot be peace when extremists are in charge. For extremists, extremism is their life purpose. Genocide and ethnic cleansing are life purposes for these people.

When you have a strong visceral dislike of something, that’s where you need to be extra doubtful of yourself, because truth is hiding behind that emotional rejection. Investigate precisely those areas where you feel visceral dislike. For example, if you hate socialists, investigate that. If you hate Nazis, investigate that. If you hate religion, investigate that. If you hate atheists, investigate that. If you hate New Agers, investigate that. If you hate Islam, investigate that. If you hate Jews, investigate that. If you hate women, investigate that. If you hate conservatives, investigate that. Apply self-doubt especially in these areas. I promise you there’s something you’re missing there. Hate is never grounded in deep understanding. Antipathy is a red flag for self-deception. Do not feed or act out antipathy but question it philosophically. What truth is your antipathy masking?

Just in general, strong negative emotions are a dead give-away of self-deception. Tell me what you hate and I'll tell you where you're self-deceived. This is a nice little heuristic.