Leo's Blog: Infinite Insights — Page 2
I just want to warn you that the AI bubble is getting worse and worse, less and less sustainable. This wave of AI is not AGI and will never reach AGI. AI is incapable of doing human jobs or serious creative work. Anyone who thinks otherwise is fooling themselves and does not understand what intelligence or creativity is. It is only a matter of time until this becomes obvious to everyone. When that happens, the market will collapse. At some point soon I expect the AI bubble to catastrophically pop. Think carefully about where your money is invested over the next few years, or you will be in a world of hurt. When the AI bubble pops, all stocks and crypto will crash. It will be a bloodbath as everyone runs for the exits. Don't get caught with your pants down. If you made a profit in this AI boom, now is the time to cash in your profits and protect your wealth.
I predict that the Trump admin will end in a miserable market crash.
Of course I could be wrong, so consider that too. Predicting the future is always epistemically dangerous. I don't like doing predictions, but in this case the situation is serious enough that it is warranted.
This is insightful. However, you should always take into account that these ex-CIA guys are self-biased, with a pro-American bias. So never fully trust their perspective.
This is why I say the Devil is a marketer.
These online gambling platforms are the clearest evidence of the spreading corruption of society. Young people are going to ruin their lives with these platforms. Make sure you never gamble online. These platforms are designed to screw you.
Shame on Rick Rubin for being in their ads. Any celebrity or influencer who participates in gambling ads should be publicly shamed.
Online gambling is a cancer. Any wealthy or famous person who promotes it should be ashamed of themselves.
Joseph Campbell is great.
Too true. Too true.
Notice how self-bias kicked in when it came to Fox distributing and promoting the movie.
This is very true:
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DZ0CtjyOzAu
Despite what my critics love to call me, no, I am not a narcissist. Not even close. I am less narcissistic than the average American adult, as measured by clinical assessment. I couldn't do what I do if I was a narcissist. However, it does take a fair amount of ego to dare to deconstruct all of science, philosophy, academia, religion, and even stuff like nonduality and Buddhism. Yeah, the reason I'm able to do that is because I have insane self-belief. I genuinely believe that I can understand Reality better than any human who has ever lived. Is that narcissism? It is what's required to achieve big things in life, whether it be business, art, or God-Realization. If you don't believe you can, you've already failed. I'm not going to surrender before I even try. That would be foolish. You have to dare to think big. The people at the top have big enough egos to dare to think and dream big. This can overlap with narcissism but isn't narcissism per se. You can dream big, think big, set big goals, and not be a narcissist. In fact, that's what I recommend. But, beware, if you do that, people will definitely gaslight you about being a narcissist. Unambitious people can't understand ambitious people.
Does it take a big ego for a non-scientist to lecture scientists on how badly they do science? Yeah! Lol. But it just so happens to be true. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Note: This is not a license for narcissism. Narcissism is a sick form of mind. You are not going to understand Reality through narcissism. That's why I'm not a narcissist. If you think I'm a narcissist, you are deeply mistaken. Again, this word, like the word cult and the word gaslighting, is much misused these days by people with superficial understanding. Be ware of superficial pop-psychology words. They are oft misused by inexperienced people and internet trolls.
Note: Robert Greene has great practical wisdom. Perhaps a little too practical. He is the Stage Orange whisperer of our times.
Science can’t be truth simply because there is so much false science. If science were truth, there could not be any false science. You can’t argue with this logic. The very existence of false science tells you that science does not have a clear distinction between science and non-science. Of course science doesn’t have that! How could it? The only way to know the difference between science and non-science is to be Omniscient. You’d have to know the complete truth of the universe in order to be able distinguish true from false science. Scientists are begging the question when they act like they already know what is and isn’t science. You don’t know! Really, grasp that you don’t know what constitutes valid science. This is the proper epistemic position. See, from this position your mind becomes open to radical possibilities like that God, psychedelics, and mysticism could be true science. Which, of course, they are. When you realize that you never knew what valid science was, you become open to expanding what “science” means. Your mind becomes intelligent enough to realize: “Oh! My initial ideas about what science was, were wrong and way too narrow. Science is a much, much deeper and broader thing than my narrow ideas about it lead me to believe. Wow! That’s a huge leap for science! This is a scientific awakening!"
Again, notice that everything comes down to the question of: How do we distinguish truth from falsehood? This is the existential vexation that scientists keep hitting their head against because they underestimate the depth of the question. They think the answer is obvious: SCIENCE! But that's false. Science is not the answer to that question. The answer is: CONSCIOUSNESS.
In the far future, science and Consciousness will become integrated. But today they are divided. My work is to unify that division. That's why I write this stuff. That's why I write my book.
