Leo's Blog: Infinite Insights — Page 32

The most important aspect of my work is to set the highest quality standard for what philosophical and spiritual work is. So that no ideology, no fantasy, no human bias, no bullshit, no diversions infect the work. To uphold the highest epistemic standard. To demand real questioning of reality, not group-think and human games. That’s the greatest value I offer. To teach you serious inquiry.

See, I am one of a handful of people on this planet who understands what real philosophical and spiritual work entails. That is exceptionally rare. Who understands the depth of the illusion we're dealing with? Just to understand the real work from the bullshit work, is the greatest lesson. I don’t want to teach you some practical answers to your life’s problems. That’s nothing. I want to teach you what real intellectual work means, the attitude of hardcore epistemic rigor that cuts through all human illusions, constructions, fantasies, and self-deceptions.

Nobody is teaching you how to think deeply about reality. Nobody is even articulating the proper standard. 95% of spiritual, philosophical, and intellectual work is human bullshit. What does real intellectual work mean? How is reality to be made sense of?

There is such a staggering amount of illusion and group-think in all intellectual work. And it's just settled-for and accepted by mankind — business as usual. My job is to not settle for any of it, because all of it obscures your ability to understand reality. My job is even just to tell you that understanding reality is the goal. Even that, nobody tells you. Nobody is even conscious enough to properly articulate the goal. That's how fucking lost people are. People don't even understand which way is North. What the fuck is life about? Scientists, academics, excepts, PhD's, philosophers, public intellectuals could not tell you. That's how lost they are.

Life is about realizing that you are an Infinite Mind imagining the world. This is the goal! Everything else is nonsense and I will not have it. And my job is to show you that you shouldn't have it either. Stop settling for human bullshit. Your proper job is to understand that you are an Infinite Mind. You're going to spend the rest of your doing that.

My job is to show you intellectual True North. Until you can find it on your own.

Note: Part of the reason I'm saying this is to clarify for myself what my job is. Because it's easy to get distracted. It's a good habit to ask yourself, What is the actual value I offer the world?

The masculine has advantages in pursuing truth over the feminine. This sounds sexist, but here's why it is the case:

• The masculine cares more about abstract things than people and relationships. You're never going to find truth in the social domain. You need to care about truth more than you care about people and relationships.
• It's easier for the masculine to be ruthless, cold, and detached. This is critical for truth-seeking. Truth must be prioritized over feelings. Cutting through illusions and fantasies is ruthless business akin to war.
• The masculine depends less on social relations for survival. Truth-seeking requires breaking free of social survival, which is harder for the feminine to do.
• The masculine is less dominated by emotions and feelings. It is impossible to do truth-seeking if you are overly emotional and moody. High femininity is simply too moody and unstable to do serious truth-seeking. Just hormonally, the masculine is more stable than the feminine. Truth-seeking requires stability.
• The masculine needs less emotional support. You will not have emotional support when doing serious truth-seeking. The feminine is accustomed to seeking emotional support from others. This is a luxury when it comes to truth-seeking. No one is going to hold your hand through existential self-annihilation.
• The masculine is better at enduring self-inflicted suffering. Truth-seeking is self-inflicted suffering. Think of the Buddha sitting under the tree for two weeks. I'm trying to think of what woman I know who would voluntarily do this.
• The masculine has better self-discipline. Self-discipline is critical for truth-seeking.
• The masculine prefers to lead rather than follow. Leading favors truth-seeking. Following favors illusion. You are not going to follow your way into deep truth.
• The masculine is less agreeable, which is necessary to break down social conventions. Truth favors intellectual disagreeableness. Needing social approval is death to truth-seeking.
• And cultural norms reinforce all the above.
• At the risk of oversimplification, truth-seeking requires big balls. But then again, some women have more balls than some men.

There is no reason why the masculine and feminine should have equal access to truth.

None of this is to say that most men are truthful or that women cannot do truth-seeking. Overall, hardcore truth-seeking is going to align better with the masculine. And the hardcore part is important because truth is hardcore. Truth-seeking has to be hardcore because it requires self-annihilation. Feminine versions of spirituality are usually not hardcore enough to break through Maya because Maya is so powerful.

This is why — traditionally — monks, hermits, ascetics, sages, yogis, philosophers, and prophets have been men. A woman can do it, but it suits feminine women less, for the same reason that chess, computer programming, and engineering suits feminine women less. Women can serve in these roles but these roles require women to take on a masculine disposition, which most young women will not be happy with.

The point is that this issue is more than cultural, more than social construction. The biology and therefore the psychology of men and women is different. It's not good or bad, it just is what it is. And you will find handfuls of individual exceptions.

Watching this mini-show. It's great.

I learned to play chess when I was 5 years old. Russians.

What upset me the most is if my dad lost on purpose. Truth.

I watched two seasons of this show, Succession. Loosely based on the Rupert Murdoch family. It's a portrayal of the unconscious pervertry of rich and powerful business tycoons. It's a tribute to corporate and elitist corruption. It's this kind of mindset that is destroying democracy, destroying America, destroying politics. It's a cartoon caricature of toxic Stage Orange unconscious behavior, Trump's version of America. This is what people without a single spiritual bone in their body behave like. It's both sickening and intriguing. It's sickening to know that this is how the largest corporations are run. Pure corruption. The corporate world is basically one giant disease and they themselves do not know it. There cannot be a healthy society when minds this sick are in charge.

But the show is very well made, well written, well acted.

When I talk about how luxury is corruption, this show is what I mean.

Most people don't realize the extraordinary amount of corruption required to maintain luxury and power. These things are not a natural condition, they require constant struggle. You must constantly fight, lie, and manipulate to maintain an unequal advantage over others, to keep them as your servants and minions.

Bullshit is a philosophical concept distinct from lying. It's a great concept for this internet 2.0/3.0 era we're in.

A liar knows what's true. A bullshitter doesn't know what's true and doesn't care what's true. A bullshitter lives life like truth doesn't exist and anything goes. To a bullshitter truth is just whatever is most convenient to say in the moment. This is the kind of human I despise the most. I loathe a bullshitter more than a murderer. Because in a certain sense bullshitters do more damage than murderers — the damage is more insidious and corrosive. They infect and degrade culture, values, ethics, intelligence. These are parasites on intelligence.

Read more: Wikipedia - On Bullshit

A great question to answer yourself when dealing with or listening to anyone is: Is this person a bullshitter? And if they are, stop listening to them. Do not respond seriously to bullshitters. Treat bullshitters as unserious people unworthy of your attention. Do not debate or debunk a bullshitter. Merely point out their immaturity, pervertry, and unseriousness. Learn to identify bullshitters quickly.

Prime examples of bullshitters:

• Donald Trump
• Alex Jones

This is a good discussion by a researcher of political psychology. This is the kind of meta-politics I love.

This channel has a lot of other great interviews of academic quality.