Metaphysical Implications Of Godel's Incompleteness Theorem - Part 1
By Leo Gura - March 26, 2018 | 5 Comments
The philosophical implications of Godel’s and Tarski’s theorems
Charles King says: I sure would like to hear your analysis of the website called: treeincarnation-the science of meaning.
Thanks for everything. I am thankful that I found you.
Max Raoy Gron says: I’m not limiting myself, how do I prove everything’s rational? I was wanting to do astral projection, and chakras, but a magical stone is just a rock, it doesn’t do anything. I’m not tied into secular stuff like avoiding chakras and out-of-body experiences, my logic isn’t objective logic, my logic’s open to all kinds of experiences, I’m not skeptical, I will contemplate being abducted by aliens, of course I will, my mind doesn’t stop the impossible from being possible, I have an open mind.
Max Raoy Gron says: The impossible possible? Listen to yourself. Sharpen your rationality. Be a real self-image of yourself and stop having a horseshit self-image, define words correctly, no more paradox, bring it to your knowledge, no more bullshit. And stop drinking coffee. Swallow your religion, stop believing in it, you’re believing in untruths, in lies, close your mind to a limited field, only be interested in the materialist department, and furthermore only narrow yourself to botany and bacteriology and no other sciences. Grab hold of at least one model of Leo Guras and apply it. Have a model of the world, use it! No excuses.
Max Raoy Gron says: Max, have you noticed you know nothing about the incompleteness theorem? It’s paradox, I don’t need this simply because it’s not going to help me with my finances, with my itineraries, or with my industrialism, it doesn’t pay the bills and it doesn’t put food on the table.
Maxiwrong says: I think Leo Gura has a theory of everything, in his infinity videos, expressed for over 2 hours in words. Any explaining of a thing is a theory, and theory doesn’t have to follow Leo Gura’s law of nature, it can be formalised using words in shorthand, e.g. O, the circle symbolises everything, if you want a simple explanation, that’s it, that’s infinity, now you know what infinity is, and as for the way Leo’s anti-dogma and with his mention of self-destruction, that’s taking the whole me out of me by force, especially the destruction of my beliefs, which can’t be forced out of my brain, there will perhaps be a time when I don’t want to believe, I didn’t know astral projection was as old as way over 3 years old, it’s ancient as even my paganism is my older beliefs, it was eventually almost beaten out of me, but still I’m wanting to be a pagan, no force in the universe says I can’t do astral projection, even though it has a thing against magic and sorcery, astral projection isn’t magic, it’s divination, the two are to be distinguished sharply, the little point of this is that I was curious about astral projection for a long time, the main point is that of all this anti-rational, anti-dogma it’s not a thing people automatically accept and say “I’m all in” talking about this over a cup of tea, it’s a scary thing to achieve, and it’s a bold move to follow it.