Non-duality has nothing to do with metaphysics

[Reciprocality]

We are here now because the alternative is our own construct and nature does not wait for constructs.

Our childhoods relation to reality were physical, it is the foundation of our thinking, any attempt to destroy the foundation destroys itself first.

 

Physicality is not a synthesis of properties in a mindstate, it is substantial on its own, the ego is the most efficient and least contrived way to deal with the existence of physical reality.

The matter of non-duality is independent of our acceptance of physical substance and independent of the characteristics of our ego.

Edited March 6 by Reciprocality

[Reciprocality]

Most humans out there in the world you are too narcissistic to face are living a fully actualised life because of their self-conceit.

[Reciprocality]

They are not self-referential like we are, they just are, and that is non-duality. If you make a theoretic framework of spirituality beyond direct experience then you will falsely imagine that other humans are not awake, and this will become your insanity.

[Reciprocality]

The part of you which is able to imagine others is not what others are, you simply do not know how others are like, you are literally alone and separated.

That, again, has nothing to do with non-duality.

[Reciprocality]

The intensity or magnitude of your consciousness is independent of your circle jerks on forums.

The question and possibility of an intensional god is subverted by a mere phenomenal "I am god" account, category error.

Edited March 6 by Reciprocality

[Reciprocality]

Concepts that did not initially directly describe things in phenomenal experience are without exception solutions to past contradictions/problems, every description of the world by means of these, such as "infinity" is thusly a logicism.

Edited March 6 by Reciprocality

[Reciprocality]

Most of you have an American collective unconscious ingrained in your mind, which means that your self-identity, your ability for reflection, analysis and your ability to think in general stands in a dialectic relation to an american unconscious, that is, that collective unconscious if feeding you the problems you are trying to solve and then in parts produces the solutions.

You refuse to understand what I am saying unless it fits within the narrative of that unconscious. Everything you are doing on this forum feeds into the problem.

Edited March 6 by Reciprocality

[Reciprocality]

There will always be good reasons for narratives and copiums, a supposedly actualised forum delves into the reasons as opposed to the copium.

Edited March 6 by Reciprocality

[Reciprocality]

Most people need others to think effectively, if you want to brag about deconstructing yourself from your culture you will need to learn the dark side of the force, thinking for yourself.

The way you do it is similar to how you learn to ride a bike, first you may need a push but then you have to give yourself the push, if those in or outside your life you have known for decades are those against which you measure whether you have come to your own conclusions or not then you haven't.

To think for yourself is to be on the offence, it is to build up the thing you are attacking in such a manner that it can only fall from specialised weapons, if the weapons you are using are lent from somewhere else then the thing you were attacking were too.

A forum, a dialogue, anything to this effect will produce lazy minds necessarily, it transmutes the object of offence into something that it is not the same way semantics are created in the mind of a child.

Edited March 6 by Reciprocality