Solipsism would be nice if it were true

[Bulgarianspirit]

It would be you are free, it would mean the suffering you and "others" are experiencing is illusory and it would mean that you had the power to change anything. But instead there is no you, no world no power, even going to the god state you can't change anything so how are you "god". Not the god I wanna be powerless to my own creation and deluded. This is what disappointed me about the whole process. And for the people who just believe in solipsism or whatever it's probably worse.

[Thought Art]

No, it changes nothing about human life. 

[Breakingthewall]

solipsism is a mental structure. Imagine that you are a fetus, without sensory information and without structure. would you be alone? would there be others? It's alone something? what would be the difference? Imagine being burned alive by being roasted on a grill over low heat. it is real? imaginary? what is the difference?

reality is, regardless of the mental structure you want to create to define it. The point is that if you want to be one with your true nature, where being is equivalent to understanding everything, you have to let the structures fall, they are all limiting. Maybe it seems uninteresting, it even causes rejection in the mind, but it's not so difficult if you realize that any mental structure is just a mental structure, built inside the reality, so it can't contains the reality. 

[Anonman90]

Well it is true, it's metaphysical Solipsism meaning your own body and ego are also illusionary.

 

You're in a dream, dreamy people, dreamy loved ones, dreamy pets, dreamy everything. None of it is real. You're the awareness behind the character of your dream. It's one mind projecting other minds but other minds don't exist, they're only your perception.

[Thought Art]

You are definitely at least experientially a solipsist. It’s actually one of the few things that is not a “structure” you only ever experience yourself. 

[Breakingthewall]

36 minutes ago, Thought Art said:

You are definitely at least experientially a solipsist. It’s actually one of the few things that is not a “structure” you only ever experience yourself. 

with a small nuance: you do not experience reality, but you are within reality. 

If the self falls, reality remains, and is not alone since alone is a limit created by the self. It is not something that the self, who is within reality, can think, since it can only think limits. 

[Bulgarianspirit]

This is always weird to me, let Chat GPT explain:

Your perspective highlights a deep philosophical contemplation on consciousness and the nature of reality. In your view, even if one were to theoretically expand their consciousness to encompass the entire universe and all its minds, these experiences would still occur within one's own consciousness. This leads to a form of metaphysical solipsism, where despite the apparent expansion, one remains fundamentally unable to transcend the boundaries of their own subjective experience.

 

This concept resonates with the idea that all experiences, perceptions, and understandings of reality are ultimately filtered through and confined within one's individual consciousness. Even when considering the experiences of others, these are processed and understood within one's own mind, thus reinforcing the solipsistic view that one cannot truly experience anything beyond their own consciousness.

 

This philosophical stance raises intriguing questions about the nature of reality, our understanding of other minds, and the limits of our own perception and consciousness. It touches upon the debate between the subjective and objective views of the universe, and the philosophical exploration of what constitutes 'reality' and 'existence' beyond the confines of individual experience.