https://www.actualized.org/insights/actualized-quotes-057      So, the argument then, and the conclusion that follows, is the following: 1. That if you're not doing MY version of philosophy, before awakening, then you're cringe and your philosophy is cringe. 2. That Philosophers of old and current, before an awakening experience or whatever spiritual/non dual experience, are cringe and their philosophy is cringe, AKA Zen foxes/devilry implication here that's show horned into the insight. 3. That there's an assumption of a distinct end to philosophy after god realization/awakening, but then says REAL philosophy happens AFTER god realization/awakening, so this assumption is a performative contradiction: that there's both a DISINCT END, but a REAL philosophy starts after awakening. Which is it?    IMO, this insight is a miss and ironically a bit cringe considering the ramifications to other types of philosophies out there. Your thoughts? Change my mind.