Understanding the nazi mind

[Majed]

 

[UnbornTao]

38 minutes ago, Majed said:

if you guys aren't paying attention to this thread, you're fucking fools. 

First, understand your mind.

[Majed]

 

[Leo Gura]

@Majed The glee with which you pursue this Nazi agenda is disturbing.

[Majed]

@Leo Gura i'm passionate about understanding the nazi mind.

Edited January 18 by Majed

[Majed]

 

[Majed]

Spectacularly beautiful.

[Majed]

 

[Majed]

great book to read

[Majed]

Eternal Treblinka: Our Treatment of Animals and the Holocaust" is a book written by Charles Patterson, first published in 2002. The title is derived from a quote by Nobel laureate Isaac Bashevis Singer, who wrote, "In relation to [animals], all people are Nazis; for the animals, it is an eternal Treblinka."

The book draws parallels between the Holocaust and the treatment of animals in the meat and dairy industries. Patterson explores the connections between the oppression and exploitation of animals and the atrocities committed during the Holocaust, arguing that both stem from a similar mindset of dominance and disregard for the well-being of other beings.

Patterson traces the historical roots of cruelty to animals and argues that the same ideologies that allowed humans to devalue and harm other humans during the Holocaust are also at play in the treatment of animals. The book aims to raise awareness about the ethical implications of how society treats animals and encourages readers to reconsider their relationship with the animal kingdom.

While the comparison between the Holocaust and the treatment of animals is controversial and has been met with criticism, the book contributes to discussions about ethics, animal rights, and the consequences of dehumanization and exploitation. It's important to note that this perspective is just one among many in the broader discourse on animal rights and ethical treatment.

[Majed]

"Eternal Treblinka" provides a unique perspective by drawing a parallel between the Holocaust and the treatment of animals, emphasizing the common thread of oppression and exploitation rooted in a mindset of dominance. One original insight from the book is the exploration of the psychological and philosophical connections between the exploitation of different groups: humans and animals.

The book suggests that the hierarchical thinking that allowed for the dehumanization of certain human groups during the Holocaust is related to the devaluation and mistreatment of animals. By examining the historical context and ideological underpinnings, Patterson invites readers to reflect on the interconnectedness of different forms of oppression and the need for a more compassionate and ethical approach to all living beings.

It's worth noting that this perspective has sparked debate, and not everyone agrees with the comparison between the Holocaust and the treatment of animals. However, the book contributes to discussions about empathy, ethics, and the consequences of viewing certain groups as inferior or expendable.

[OBEler]

1 hour ago, Majed said:

"Eternal Treblinka" provides a unique perspective by drawing a parallel between the Holocaust and the treatment of animals, emphasizing the common thread of oppression and exploitation rooted in a mindset of dominance. One original insight from the book is the exploration of the psychological and philosophical connections between the exploitation of different groups: humans and animals.

The book suggests that the hierarchical thinking that allowed for the dehumanization of certain human groups during the Holocaust is related to the devaluation and mistreatment of animals. By examining the historical context and ideological underpinnings, Patterson invites readers to reflect on the interconnectedness of different forms of oppression and the need for a more compassionate and ethical approach to all living beings.

It's worth noting that this perspective has sparked debate, and not everyone agrees with the comparison between the Holocaust and the treatment of animals. However, the book contributes to discussions about empathy, ethics, and the consequences of viewing certain groups as inferior or expendable.

Very interesting thanks. It's paradox that Nazis loved animals and one of Hitlers first actions was to give animals right and protection - before that animals were treated as objects. Back then Nazi Germany had the most advanced animal rights in the whole world. But that will no one tell you in these propaganda movies or call of duty games.

 

Edited January 19 by OBEler

[Yimpa]

20 minutes ago, OBEler said:

Very interesting thanks. It's paradox that Nazis loved animals and one of Hitlers first actions was to give animals right and protection - before that animals were treated as objects. Back then Nazi Germany had the most advanced animal rights in the whole world. But that will no one tell you in these propaganda movies or call of duty games.

The Boston Marathon bomber has a similar story

https://www.cnn.com/2015/05/04/us/boston-bombing-tsarnaev-sentencing/index.html

[Majed]

 

[Majed]

One aspect of the treatment of homosexuals in Nazi Germany that is worth exploring is the paradoxical approach the regime took towards them. While the Nazis were infamous for their persecution and brutal treatment of various marginalized groups, including Jews, Romani people, and disabled individuals, their approach to homosexuals was complex and contradictory.

On the one hand, the Nazi regime, under the leadership of Adolf Hitler, implemented a harsh anti-homosexual policy. In 1935, the Nazis strengthened Paragraph 175 of the German Criminal Code, criminalizing male homosexuality. Thousands of gay men were arrested and sent to concentration camps, where they faced brutal conditions and often did not survive.

However, there is a paradox in the fact that some high-ranking Nazi officials, including Ernst Röhm, the leader of the SA (Sturmabteilung), were themselves known to be homosexual. Röhm's homosexuality was an open secret within the Nazi Party, and his close relationships with other gay SA members were tolerated during the early years of the regime. This tolerance changed during the "Night of the Long Knives" in 1934 when Hitler, fearing a potential threat from the SA, ordered the execution of Röhm and other SA leaders, including those suspected of being homosexual.

This paradox raises questions about the internal contradictions within the Nazi ideology. It suggests that, despite their strict anti-homosexual policies on the surface, the Nazis were willing to tolerate homosexuality to some extent if it served their political purposes. The persecution of homosexuals, therefore, can be seen as both a result of the Nazis' deep-seated homophobia and a tool for eliminating potential political rivals and consolidating power.

[OBEler]

If the Nazis were tolerant to homosexuals, the whole ideology would be broken 

[Majed]

Psychopathography of Adolf Hitler :

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychopathography_of_Adolf_Hitler 
 

[Majed]

On 1/6/2024 at 9:17 PM, Majed said:

let's get this thread to 10k views 

mission accomplished 

[Majed]

 

[Majed]