rachMiel

The truth is what-is

20 posts in this topic

What is 'what-is' in the statement: 

The truth is what-is. 


Merrily, merrily, merrily, merrily ... 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

such questions and conversations are best had with chat-gpt

when it confuses you then ask something here

here is the last port of call not the first

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd say it's a acceptance statement to let an unknown truth be what it is regardless of speculative thoughts about it. 

Iiit iiis what it iiiiiisssss... 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, gettoefl said:

such questions and conversations are best had with chat-gpt

when it confuses you then ask something here

here is the last port of call not the first

HAHAHAAH you are funny man. I do hope one day we create a BOT whose job it is to handle epistemological questions because at a certain point...you have heard them all. There is a guy who made a thread earlier who thinks he has made new arguments. I'm like....dude you need to go back deep in storage and you will see we pretty much hashed through like all objections at this point.


You are a selfless LACK OF APPEARANCE, that CONSTRUCTS AN APPEARANCE. But that appearance can disappear and reappear and we call that change, we call it time, we call it space, we call it distance, we call distinctness, we call it other. But notice...this appearance, is a SELF. A SELF IS A CONSTRUCTION!!! 

So if you want to know the TRUTH OF THE CONSTRUCTION. Just deconstruct the construction!!!! No point in playing these mind games!!! No point in creating needless complexity!!! The truth of what you are is a BLANK!!!! A selfless awareness....then that means there is NO OTHER, and everything you have ever perceived was JUST AN APPEARANCE, A MIRAGE, AN ILLUSION, IMAGINARY. 

Everything that appears....appears out of a lack of appearance/void/no-thing, non-sense (can't be sensed because there is nothing to sense). That is what you are, and what arises...is made of that. So nonexistence, arises/creates existence. And thus everything is solved.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, ZzzleepingBear said:

I'd say it's a acceptance statement to let an unknown truth be what it is regardless of speculative thoughts about it. 

Iiit iiis what it iiiiiisssss... 

Something like: The truth is the truth? 


Merrily, merrily, merrily, merrily ... 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@rachMiel Rather, what ever the truth is. It will show itself just the way it is, in one way or other regardless of our own conclusions about it.

Truth is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Say 'truth' is an idea, a human invention. Will it show itself as that? 

Edited by rachMiel

Merrily, merrily, merrily, merrily ... 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@AerisVahnEphelia Sorry, I fail to fathom. 'There is nothing that exists.' Or, 'Nothing(ness) is an existent.' Help! :-) 


Merrily, merrily, merrily, merrily ... 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The word "truth" in the average use of the word definitely points to "what exists." It is a definition that humans created. 

Someone asks: Is there a unicorn in your room? You say yes, they say you are not telling the truth. You say no, they say you are telling the truth. In order to verify whether you are telling the truth, the person has to check your room for the unicorn to see if it exists there.

I would separate absolute truth from this human-invented notion of truth, because existence itself is meta to all notions and definitions you can come up with. The definitions happen inside of existence, so it does not capture existence since it is a subset of existence. Absolute truth points to what exists, but the realization of what exists is not a conclusion like "that thing exists therefore it is true", it is just realizing exactly what exists. You could say it is like realizing that nothing untrue can exist, therefore truth as a concept dissolves entirely in that realization.


Describe a thought.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Whatever's the case. Start with what you've got and keep moving towards what's most true according to your estimation. A chair is a chair, don't call it a sofa.

Call things by their name and get at the root of your experience. Acknowledge your experience and go from there.

Nobody here knows what anything is.

Edited by UnbornTao

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Osaid "Absolute truth points to what exists." From whose/what point of view? In what context?


Merrily, merrily, merrily, merrily ... 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@UnbornTao "Nobody here knows what anything is." BOOM! :-) 


Merrily, merrily, merrily, merrily ... 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, rachMiel said:

From whose/what point of view?

From the point of view of someone who is trying to figure out what reality or existence is, or such existential questions.

2 minutes ago, rachMiel said:

In what context?

The context of your current experience, no other context is needed, because you exist, and you are trying to figure out what you exist as.


Describe a thought.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, rachMiel said:

What is 'what-is' in the statement: 

The truth is what-is. 

its a cope. Someone rightly cant understand what the truth is and so they say it is what it is, which is true LOL

jokes aside it just means Isness, being, nowness, that which BE. Being is truth. Not being this or being that, being itself. Isness, consciousness, awareness without the object thats is being "awared of".

Edited by Dodo

Mind over Matter, Awareness over Mind

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Dodo But why equate existence with absolute truth? Why not nothingness? Or consciousness or spirit or brahman? Why does existence get such a privileged position? 


Merrily, merrily, merrily, merrily ... 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, rachMiel said:

@Dodo But why equate existence with absolute truth? Why not nothingness? Or consciousness or spirit or brahman? Why does existence get such a privileged position? 

dont they say its the same thing? sat chit ananda, existence consciousness bliss

consciousness means existence 


Mind over Matter, Awareness over Mind

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Dodo Consciousness=existence is held true in some traditions, like Advaita, in others not. But why give any concept, existence or consciousness or bliss or nothingness or brahman, a privileged position in relation to absolute truth? (Not a leading question, I don't have a good answer!) 


Merrily, merrily, merrily, merrily ... 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now