Why Daniel is a genius

[Carl-Richard]

When you can tie the quantum foam at beginning of the universe to what makes a meaningful life in under half an hour, your name can only be Daniel Schmachtenberger.

 

[Buck Edwards]

He reminds me of Eckhart Tolle or Terence McKenna or Alan Watts. 

[Carl-Richard]

29 minutes ago, Buck Edwards said:

He reminds me of Eckhart Tolle or Terence McKenna or Alan Watts. 

I thought while watching the video that he is like a healthier Terrence McKenna who didn't become addicted to weed and had 30 more IQ points installed.

Edited October 14, 2023 by Carl-Richard

[MuadDib]

I am currently going through Eben Pagan and Wyatt Woodsmall's Mind control course. It's a 25-hour seminar that covers the creation of 'success' as an emergent property through systemic changes in ones life, at the physical, emotional and logical levels by promoting synergy between parts and upgrading peoples memetic structures to better accomplish those aims. Listening to this was like a trailer to the seminar.

[Happy Lizard]

@MuadDib where do you find the course, and much did it cost you?

[Rigel]

I like the guy. He loves what he does.

[Carl-Richard]

Nora Bateson is the daughter of Gregory Bateson, one of the pioneers of systems theory. They're a really good combination.

Edited November 23, 2023 by Carl-Richard

[Danioover9000]

@Carl-Richard The videos you've provided, while somewhat convincing, isn't a sufficient explanation for why Daniel is a genius, so what is your argument for why he is one?

 

   Also, why is Daniel Schmachtenberger a genius, over someone like Nikola Tesla?

Edited October 15, 2023 by Danioover9000

[Juan]

@Danioover9000 Don’t you like Daniel Schmachtenberger?

 

[Razard86]

1 hour ago, Danioover9000 said:

@Carl-Richard The videos you've provided, while somewhat convincing, isn't a sufficient explanation for why Daniel is a genius, so what is your argument for why he is one?

 

   Also, why is Daniel Schmachtenberger a genius, over someone like Nikola Tesla?

Everyone is a genius. But it takes a genius to see the genius. 

[Leo Gura]

The only problem is that Game B will never work in our political world, so the core of his philosophy is pure fantasy. It sounds nice but it is not how the world is run.

Edited October 15, 2023 by Leo Gura

[Francis777]

On 14/10/2023 at 3:22 AM, Buck Edwards said:

He reminds me of Eckhart Tolle or Terence McKenna or Alan Watts. 

he actually looks a lot like terence mckenna

 

[zurew]

33 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

The only problem is that Game B will never work in our political world, so the core of his philosophy is pure fantasy. It sounds nice but it is not how the world is run.

How the world is run is different from all the possible ways - how the world could be run. Do you assert that a game B world is highely unlikely or that it is impossible? Because if you claim that it is impossible, then I would be interested in the justification for that.

Edited October 15, 2023 by zurew

[Danioover9000]

@Razard86

1 hour ago, Razard86 said:

Everyone is a genius. But it takes a genius to see the genius. 

   The main problem is that alone is not compelling enough to argue why Daniel Schmachtenberger is a genius. Just stating everyone's a genius dilutes the meaning of genius, and you stating it takes a genius to know a genius, so what? It's like stating it takes a person who remembers everything in their life, photographic levels of memory, to know one, plus everyone's great with their memories, therefore why should we care about people like these when everyone is really great remembering everything in their life:

 

   This also dovetails to why hierarchies in existence are important, and why flattening those hierarchies might have many costs such as immense devaluing of what makes a genius a genius and not a genius, right?

Edited October 15, 2023 by Danioover9000

[Danioover9000]

@Juan

2 hours ago, Juan said:

@Danioover9000 Don’t you like Daniel Schmachtenberger?

 

   Yes I do, so what does that have to do with @Carl-Richard's assertion that he's a genius?

[Leo Gura]

1 hour ago, zurew said:

Do you assert that a game B world is highely unlikely or that it is impossible?

It will be possible in the future but within our lifetime it is not how things will run. Nobody is at the levels of development needed to sustain Game B. And they will not be for another 100 years.

Edited October 15, 2023 by Leo Gura

[Princess Arabia]

2 hours ago, Danioover9000 said:

why should we care about people like these when everyone is really great remembering everything in their life:

I forgot what I had for breakfast 5 days ago, much less 5yrs ago. You are incorrect when you say everyone is great at remembering everything in their lives. Most stories being told by humans about their past have about a 50% (not sure of the percentage but it's high) accuracy level. That's why they're called stories. Put 10 people at an accident scene, you'll have 10 different interpretations because of how differently the brain interprets things. It is an exceptional trait to be able to remember everything that has happened to you in your life in minute detail of every day. What was your post in December of 2020 and did you even make one. These people would remember that, can you.

Edited October 15, 2023 by Princess Arabia

[zurew]

42 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

It will be possible in the future but within our lifetime it is not how things will run. Nobody is at the levels of development needed to sustain Game B. And they will not be for another 100 years.

I think most game B people agree with that including Daniel. I think most of them have the position of trying to put down the groundwork for game B in their lifetime if they are lucky.

For example  here  in this video Jordan Hall (one  of the  game  B guys) agree  with John Vervaeke's notion of a cathedral mind, which means this: "Start building a cathedral with the full knowledge, that you won't see its completion".

Its timestamped.

 

Edited October 15, 2023 by zurew

[Danioover9000]

@Princess Arabia

43 minutes ago, Princess Arabia said:

I forgot what I had for breakfast 5 days ago, much less 5yrs ago. You are incorrect when you say everyone is great at remembering everything in their lives. Most stories being told by humans about their past have about a 50% (not sure of the percentage but it's high) accuracy level. That's why they're called stories. Put 10 people at an accident scene, you'll have 10 different interpretations because of how differently the brain interprets things. It is an exceptional trait to be able to remember everything that has happened to you in your life in minute detail of every day. What was your post in December of 2020 and did you even make one. These people would remember that, can you.

   I partly agree, but that's not the main point I'm making and arguing for, that was towards @Razard86  when he posted this:

4 hours ago, Razard86 said:

Everyone is a genius. But it takes a genius to see the genius. 

   So @Princess Arabia, what is the quickest way for me to devalue you as a person, as a human being, logically speaking? For example, if you claimed in the past the following:

   'I don't really believe this, infact, that's not how attraction works. Good looking? Good looking to whom. Put 10 pictures up and you will have different opinions as to who finds who attractive and good looking. An "ugly" (just for communication purposes because I donlt see people as ugly), an ugly person can see themselves as quite attractive and get more dates than someone physically attractive who don't view themselves as that, and that goes for both male and female, but more towards the male side since men usually go for looks first.'.

   And I said to you 'So? Everyone is attractive, and everyone is ugly, and every man goes for the looks, and every man and woman that's ugly can see themselves quite attractive. However, it takes a sexy attractive person to see the attraction, it takes the ugly person to see the ugliness, it takes both ugly males and females that see themselves as quite attractive to see their attractiveness.'. Am I devaluing you by hyper generalizing your take?

[Rafael Thundercat]

All I hear here from Daniel is a bunch of bubdle expensive words linked together and little Actuality. Concept and Imagination running wild and exploding through the windows as green goo. Sheldon from The Nerdy comedy Show can do it better, and funnier