integral

Is Leo an Experientialist?

16 posts in this topic

Was looking at Epistemological paradigms and was trying to place Leos.

Its not Empiricism

Its not Rationalism

Its not Deconstructionism?

So is it Experientialism?


How is this post just me acting out my ego in the usual ways? Is this post just me venting and justifying my selfishness? Are the things you are posting in alignment with principles of higher consciousness and higher stages of ego development? Are you acting in a mature or immature way? Are you being selfish or selfless in your communication? Are you acting like a monkey or like a God-like being?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would say: understandism. Leo does not seek mystical states for their beauty or freedom. seeks to understand and translate them into conceptual language. He does not seem that he seeks to help others to achieve mystical states, but rather that he seeks an audience to which to transmit what he has understood. that is his business, although perhaps now he completely changes his attitude and becomes a teacher, since he is preparing a course

Edited by Breakingthewall

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Leo is definitely an empiricist. He thinks our perceptions are absolute truth. He thinks rationality cannot be trusted but our senses can. At least that was his view when I talked to him about the veil of perception.


“Our most valuable resource is not time, but rather it is consciousness itself. Consciousness is the basis for everything, and without it, there could be no time and no resource possible. It is only through consciousness and its cultivation that one’s passions, one’s focus, one’s curiosity, one’s time, and one’s capacity to love can be actualized and lived to the fullest.” - r0ckyreed

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, Breakingthewall said:

Leo does not seek mystical states for their beauty or freedom. seeks to understand and translate them into conceptual language.

Experientialism: a philosophical theory that experience is the source of all knowledge.

In that sense, direct experience is the only Truth


How is this post just me acting out my ego in the usual ways? Is this post just me venting and justifying my selfishness? Are the things you are posting in alignment with principles of higher consciousness and higher stages of ego development? Are you acting in a mature or immature way? Are you being selfish or selfless in your communication? Are you acting like a monkey or like a God-like being?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, integral said:

Experientialism: a philosophical theory that experience is the source of all knowledge.

In that sense, direct experience is the only Truth

Yeah, you are right, I diverted to something else: in a purely mystical sense, experience is the only truth, that is, experience cannot be explained, or transmitted, you can only teach others to have that experience, which is the truth, not tell them the Truth, nor tell yourself the truth or translate it into words, just experience. But maybe he does both 

Edited by Breakingthewall

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@r0ckyreed ChatGPT

Empiricism vs Experientialism

"Empiricism" and "experientialism" are related concepts that both emphasize the role of experience in acquiring knowledge, but they are often used in slightly different contexts. Let's compare the two:

Empiricism:

Empiricism is a philosophical approach that asserts that knowledge primarily comes from sensory experience and observation. Empiricists argue that our understanding of the world is built upon what we can see, hear, touch, taste, and smell. Empiricism is often associated with the scientific method, as it values evidence-based reasoning and experimentation.

Key Points of Empiricism:

  • Knowledge is derived from sensory experience and observation.
  • Empirical evidence, gained through the senses, is crucial for forming beliefs.
  • Emphasizes a scientific and systematic approach to understanding the world.
  • Rejects the idea of innate knowledge or ideas that exist independently of experience.

Experientialism:

Experientialism is a broader term that encompasses the idea that personal experiences play a significant role in shaping one's understanding, beliefs, and perspectives. While it shares similarities with empiricism, experientialism extends beyond the strict reliance on sensory experiences to include a wider range of personal encounters and reflections.

Key Points of Experientialism:

  • Acknowledges the importance of personal experiences in shaping knowledge and understanding.
  • Includes a wider spectrum of experiences beyond just sensory perception, such as emotional, psychological, and introspective experiences.
  • Encourages learning through direct engagement, experimentation, and personal involvement.
  • May incorporate subjective and qualitative aspects of experience that go beyond empirical data.

In summary, while empiricism specifically focuses on knowledge gained through sensory experience and observation, experientialism encompasses a broader range of personal experiences, including emotional, psychological, and introspective aspects. Empiricism is often associated with the scientific method and a more objective approach, whereas experientialism is open to considering a wider array of subjective experiences as valid sources of insight and understanding.

Edited by integral

How is this post just me acting out my ego in the usual ways? Is this post just me venting and justifying my selfishness? Are the things you are posting in alignment with principles of higher consciousness and higher stages of ego development? Are you acting in a mature or immature way? Are you being selfish or selfless in your communication? Are you acting like a monkey or like a God-like being?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Based on the above Experientialism is like a Trans-rational-Empiricism

Transrationalism is probably a thing. 

Edited by integral

How is this post just me acting out my ego in the usual ways? Is this post just me venting and justifying my selfishness? Are the things you are posting in alignment with principles of higher consciousness and higher stages of ego development? Are you acting in a mature or immature way? Are you being selfish or selfless in your communication? Are you acting like a monkey or like a God-like being?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think he is. He is a hyper rationalist though. 

Edited by Buck Edwards

My name is Victoria. 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, integral said:

@r0ckyreed ChatGPT

Empiricism vs Experientialism

"Empiricism" and "experientialism" are related concepts that both emphasize the role of experience in acquiring knowledge, but they are often used in slightly different contexts. Let's compare the two:

Empiricism:

Empiricism is a philosophical approach that asserts that knowledge primarily comes from sensory experience and observation. Empiricists argue that our understanding of the world is built upon what we can see, hear, touch, taste, and smell. Empiricism is often associated with the scientific method, as it values evidence-based reasoning and experimentation.

Key Points of Empiricism:

  • Knowledge is derived from sensory experience and observation.
  • Empirical evidence, gained through the senses, is crucial for forming beliefs.
  • Emphasizes a scientific and systematic approach to understanding the world.
  • Rejects the idea of innate knowledge or ideas that exist independently of experience.

Experientialism:

Experientialism is a broader term that encompasses the idea that personal experiences play a significant role in shaping one's understanding, beliefs, and perspectives. While it shares similarities with empiricism, experientialism extends beyond the strict reliance on sensory experiences to include a wider range of personal encounters and reflections.

Key Points of Experientialism:

  • Acknowledges the importance of personal experiences in shaping knowledge and understanding.
  • Includes a wider spectrum of experiences beyond just sensory perception, such as emotional, psychological, and introspective experiences.
  • Encourages learning through direct engagement, experimentation, and personal involvement.
  • May incorporate subjective and qualitative aspects of experience that go beyond empirical data.

In summary, while empiricism specifically focuses on knowledge gained through sensory experience and observation, experientialism encompasses a broader range of personal experiences, including emotional, psychological, and introspective aspects. Empiricism is often associated with the scientific method and a more objective approach, whereas experientialism is open to considering a wider array of subjective experiences as valid sources of insight and understanding.

This does not make sense. There is ONLY experience. You cannot say it primarily comes, that is a lie. There is ONLY EXPERIENCE. EXPERIENCE IS ABSOLUTE. Anything you know....has ONLY BEEN KNOWN IN EXPERIENCE. Primarily is an inaccurate term. 

Also both houses of thought are just logical games made to complicate something simple. The Truth is everything is ONE EXISTENCE. That's it. Anything outside of that is logical games. I like logical games and play them myself but everything always goes back to....you can not KNOW ANYTHING OUTSIDE OF EXPERIENCE.


You are a selfless LACK OF APPEARANCE, that CONSTRUCTS AN APPEARANCE. But that appearance can disappear and reappear and we call that change, we call it time, we call it space, we call it distance, we call distinctness, we call it other. But notice...this appearance, is a SELF. A SELF IS A CONSTRUCTION!!! 

So if you want to know the TRUTH OF THE CONSTRUCTION. Just deconstruct the construction!!!! No point in playing these mind games!!! No point in creating needless complexity!!! The truth of what you are is a BLANK!!!! A selfless awareness....then that means there is NO OTHER, and everything you have ever perceived was JUST AN APPEARANCE, A MIRAGE, AN ILLUSION, IMAGINARY. 

Everything that appears....appears out of a lack of appearance/void/no-thing, non-sense (can't be sensed because there is nothing to sense). That is what you are, and what arises...is made of that. So nonexistence, arises/creates existence. And thus everything is solved.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, Razard86 said:

you can not KNOW ANYTHING OUTSIDE OF EXPERIENCE.

Yes, but that does not contradict the existence of an objective reality


Nothing will prevent Wily.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

1 hour ago, Razard86 said:

This does not make sense. There is ONLY experience. You cannot say it primarily comes, that is a lie. There is ONLY EXPERIENCE. EXPERIENCE IS ABSOLUTE. Anything you know....has ONLY BEEN KNOWN IN EXPERIENCE. Primarily is an inaccurate term. 

Also both houses of thought are just logical games made to complicate something simple. The Truth is everything is ONE EXISTENCE. That's it. Anything outside of that is logical games. I like logical games and play them myself but everything always goes back to....you can not KNOW ANYTHING OUTSIDE OF EXPERIENCE.

@Raza Zaveri No, this is wrong.

You are basically limiting everything to your 5 Senses. 

5 senses are fine for survival but won't get you to the beyond.

You are right there is Only One Existence ?? 

Edited by Javfly33

Fear is just a thought

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 8/14/2023 at 4:37 PM, integral said:

Was looking at Epistemological paradigms and was trying to place Leos.

Its not Empiricism

Its not Rationalism

Its not Deconstructionism?

So is it Experientialism?

He's simply an Idealist.  It Just means everything is mind.

Edited by Inliytened1

 

Wisdom.  Truth.  Love.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought he was an alien insanitist...silly me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 8/14/2023 at 5:31 PM, integral said:

@r0ckyreed ChatGPT

Empiricism vs Experientialism

"Empiricism" and "experientialism" are related concepts that both emphasize the role of experience in acquiring knowledge, but they are often used in slightly different contexts. Let's compare the two:

Empiricism:

Empiricism is a philosophical approach that asserts that knowledge primarily comes from sensory experience and observation. Empiricists argue that our understanding of the world is built upon what we can see, hear, touch, taste, and smell. Empiricism is often associated with the scientific method, as it values evidence-based reasoning and experimentation.

Key Points of Empiricism:

  • Knowledge is derived from sensory experience and observation.
  • Empirical evidence, gained through the senses, is crucial for forming beliefs.
  • Emphasizes a scientific and systematic approach to understanding the world.
  • Rejects the idea of innate knowledge or ideas that exist independently of experience.

Experientialism:

Experientialism is a broader term that encompasses the idea that personal experiences play a significant role in shaping one's understanding, beliefs, and perspectives. While it shares similarities with empiricism, experientialism extends beyond the strict reliance on sensory experiences to include a wider range of personal encounters and reflections.

Key Points of Experientialism:

  • Acknowledges the importance of personal experiences in shaping knowledge and understanding.
  • Includes a wider spectrum of experiences beyond just sensory perception, such as emotional, psychological, and introspective experiences.
  • Encourages learning through direct engagement, experimentation, and personal involvement.
  • May incorporate subjective and qualitative aspects of experience that go beyond empirical data.

In summary, while empiricism specifically focuses on knowledge gained through sensory experience and observation, experientialism encompasses a broader range of personal experiences, including emotional, psychological, and introspective aspects. Empiricism is often associated with the scientific method and a more objective approach, whereas experientialism is open to considering a wider array of subjective experiences as valid sources of insight and understanding.

I would agree with that analysis then.


“Our most valuable resource is not time, but rather it is consciousness itself. Consciousness is the basis for everything, and without it, there could be no time and no resource possible. It is only through consciousness and its cultivation that one’s passions, one’s focus, one’s curiosity, one’s time, and one’s capacity to love can be actualized and lived to the fullest.” - r0ckyreed

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He is an investigator of reality. he has realized that he is the reality, and investigates himself. his research has no end, he is like an entomologist who is dedicated to classifying insects in an infinite jungle

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

but that is not enlightenment. enlightenment is something that happens.

the drop falls.... tak!.... and infinity is. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now