mr_engineer

I finally figured out the answer to the question 'What do women want?'

140 posts in this topic

1 minute ago, Leo Gura said:

Yeah, but I have dozens more brilliant and hilarious openers.

Oh, cool. That's a lot of openers then.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Lila9 said:

And most men that I dated were students who worked in those exact shitty jobs.

Why did those relationships end? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Lila9 said:

These relationships weren't planned. I did want to love and be loved but I also didn't want it to come at the expense of my own artistic growth, it was my top priority, especially as a beginner.

Also my immaturity and some unhealed trauma. It takes some time for a girl to become a woman.

Right. So, your priority wasn't relationships. 

You're not the woman I'm talking about in this post, in that case. I'm talking about women who are fully ready for relationships, whose priority is relationships, who understand the gravity of commitment. 

Also, artistic growth can happen while being with the right man. It doesn't have to come at the expense of relationships. In fact, it can happen because of being with the right man! 

You have the luxury of talking in abstract terms like 'wanting to love and wanting to be loved' cuz your priority is not relationships. Those of us who value relationships don't have that luxury. How we go about this really, really matters to us. And we don't waste time prioritizing other stuff over relationships, relationships are it for us. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Leo Gura said:

I was thinking of doing a video of Leo's Favorite Openers just for fun.

Worthless video. My openers are way better than yours.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Nabd 

Are you the guy on the picture?

If so, you look like a singer from Brazil called Cazuza.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Lila9 said:

For women who are genuinely and fully ready for relationship, their top priority is to meet a loving man who shares the same values, someone who they can open up to and intimitaly connect to, this is the most satisfying thing that no money can ever replace. Money is a bonus but it's not necessarily the most important thing. There are women who want to date only rich men, but they are not the majority of women and it's very likely that these women replace their need for human intimacy and connection with materialistic pursuit, due to some underlying fear of intimacy and true connection.

It's true that many couples fight because of money, but it can happen both with rich and poor couples, money will always be a reason for fights. There will always be disagreements in relationships, including disagreements about dominant themes like money.

I agree that artistic growth can happen while in relationship, but it very depends on the type of the relationship and the the individuals. It's not easy to be a partner of an artistic person, good art requires a lot of isolation and alone time. Artists need partners who are more selfless and would love them strong enough to give them this space to create, even if they sometimes might feel neglected or abandoned themselves. It's possible and happen all the time, but it's not easy to find someone who would stick in this kind of relationship.

This doesn't read like someone whose priority is relationships has written this. And, I disagree that artists need isolation-time. I'm an artist and I create the best when I'm teaming up with compatible people. 

5 hours ago, Lila9 said:

The need to love and to be loved is an important human need, that's why humans are drawn to relationships.

However, self actualization is a very importent human need as well.

Not always, but sometimes, these two needs clash.

Since this is a finite world where our time and energy are limited, sometimes we have to make hard decisions and compromise.

They shouldn't clash. And you sound like you haven't put in the work to make sure that doesn't happen. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, something_else said:

@mr_engineer have you ever actually been in a relationship? 

No, and this is why. I'm just not old enough for it yet! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@mr_engineer dude if you could not take care of your needs first and fullfill them then how could you take care of someone else's needs . And once you said me on my post that forget about girls right now and first earn a decent career. The thing I have to say is that focussing on career is important but neglecting your needs is an unhealthy way to live life. What one can do is besides building one's career one can also talk to girls on the side.

Edited by Rishabh R

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Rishabh R said:

@mr_engineer dude if you could not take care of your needs first and fullfill them then how could you take care of someone else's needs . And once you said me on my post that forget about girls right now and first earn a decent career. The thing I have to say is that focussing on career is important but neglecting your needs is an unhealthy way to live life. What one can do is besides building one's career one can also talk to girls on the side.

I stand by what I said when it comes to LTRs. And 'talking to girls' is very different from being ready for an LTR. Again, fine, you can talk to girls on the side and sleep with girls on the side. You don't have to neglect your needs. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Nabd said:

I come from the middle east and it's a very harsh environment where survival is not guaranteed and money is very important, but I have seen many relationships where women were working and earning more money than men and these relationships are long term.

Im talking about a population where 90% of the people are actually in critical condition of being poor (most people earn 10-15$ a month while you need like 100$) and of course you see gold diggers or women who would only be in a relationship with a man who earns alot, but they are by no means the majority, hell ive been in one and I know at least 2 guys who actually married women who make double their income.

I can't be sure about the situation in the US or Europe but i highly doubt its as bad as some of the comments on this thread seems to suggest.

Interesting! Very. For fresh perspectives like this I keep lurking arround in the forum. I always thought that in Middle East the Women is not supposed to earn more. Which country you life in? Are the men feeling bad cuz of this or are they just happy to have such a woman as partner? What are examples of the jobs of men and women? Why is it like that - men are less educated?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Nabd said:

Thats the french psychoanalyst Jacques Lacan in the picture, but we do look quite similar, lacan me and Cazuza lol

You have to start your Singer/Songwriter Career - the first Album will be called "Lacan, Cazuza and me"))

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, mr_engineer said:

No, and this is why. I'm just not old enough for it yet! 

This is what I suggested yesterday. How old are you roughly?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, supremeyingyang said:

This is what I suggested yesterday. How old are you roughly?

I'm 27. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, supremeyingyang said:

Do you want to achieves some of your goals to get ready for serious dating?

Yes. This is me setting those goals. 

1 hour ago, supremeyingyang said:

You've been with a woman casually I suppose.

I did some pick-up, saw what hooks women and got disgusted and disillusioned with the whole hook-up scene. It's very shallow and objectifying towards women, I never wanted to get into it. I just couldn't ignore it because of how normalized it's become. 

I am very scared of casual-dating, actually, because of the possibility of learning the wrong patterns with the wrong women. If you fall into the habit of 'not being logical' and 'not thinking about the consequences of your actions to yourself and to others', if you just 'go with the flow', this does not improve your selection of women. The biggest advice PUAs give is to 'let go of rejection' and to 'not take it personally' (which, by the way, contradicts the advice of working on your game and getting better with women, which implies that rejection is personal) and to approach indiscriminately. What this will do, in the best-case scenario, is it will attract low-quality women. Because, when you do no selection on your end and you have no standards, you give off a 'douchey' vibe yourself. So, the high-quality women will pass. Fine, congratulations, you got laid, but at what cost?! 

Selecting high-quality women and making things work with them takes a lot of brains, from what I've seen. These women don't settle, they're not in the casual dating-scene for entirely logical reasons. They have relationship-visions, strategies, foundations, plans, execution, positioning. They know their worth, they think very hard when it comes to selecting men. So, why shouldn't we think hard when it comes to selecting them?! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, mr_engineer said:

No, and this is why. I'm just not old enough for it yet! 

Then stop coming up with theories on topics you don’t know much about xD

Go and have a relationship or two and then you’ll start to understand how woman think about relationships much better.

Edited by something_else

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, Leo Gura said:

Yeah, but I have dozens more brilliant and hilarious openers.

Paywall post inc?


This is not a Signature    [TBA]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They want physically attractive men who also have some kind of social power in a context relevant to them and their interest. If women did not care about physical attractiveness, paternity fraud would not exist, genetic fitness is very important to women but they evolved to conceal their true sexuality and the most genetically fit (attractive men) are not always the most socially acceptable.

Edited by Tenebroso

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now