From energy-conversion to infinity

[Reciprocality]

Are there anyone here who would be interested to understand how the law of energy-conversion implies infinite consciousness?

If so then hit me up or comment in the thread, it is pretty amazing, though only the implication is correct, the ground, or the "law" is false, there are no laws in the universe, and energy is not a concept but an idea, so not only does their "law" fail to be a law but it fails even at that. And that a law fails to fail is analogous to how when you try to hit a bullseye you failed even at pulling the trigger.

[thenondualtankie]

Do share!

[Reciprocality]

Okay hello there @thenondualtankie

 imagine a TV

And lets say this tv has 50 inches diagonally

 

Imagine now that for every time we add an additional inch the surface of the TV grows more then the last time, even though the surface grows less for every increment in proportion to the whole surface.

This is literally how the universe itself works, such that the first second of the universe is bigger in proportion to the then whole universe than the present second of the universe is in proportion to the now whole universe, even though the present second of the whole universe is far bigger in itself than the first one. 

With that out of the way now let us investigate what we could possibly mean with something that is conserved per second under these cosmological conditions.

What happens is that less energy is needed over time to preserve the structural integrity forwardly of the moment leading up to it, so since space itself can never change size (knowable a priori), it is triangulated that instead of the universe expanding it is actually the matter which is shrinking.

 

If we now look closely on the second itself and divide it into ten we find that under the law of conservation there is an identical amount of energy in the tenth of a second as there is in a whole one, and so it goes towards infinitely small compartments, now in reality the conservation theory is false, for it fails to account for how the expressed energy of the universe is proportional to how much matter has shrunk, instead it is an equilibrium theory of structures and only under that heading supported by its scientific observations.

So why is infinite consciousness then possible, if it seems to be negated by the scientific theory? Its because the whole simultaneity of the universe is contained in each part, and simultaneity does contain a whole lot of unexpressed energy still, infinitely more than any of us could handle.

The whole universe beyond this immediate moment is literally an illusion, under the theory of energy conservation, since the whole time dimension must be contained in its cuts (simultaneity) of it, I argue it only is correct in relation to the future, while energy certainly is destroyed in the past (and appears not so due to the perpetual shrinkage of matter, and the scientific evidence that then supports the notion that 1kj is the same in the beginning of the universe as right now is literally what instead negates it.

Edited June 27, 2023 by Reciprocality

[Reciprocality]

Now any sobriety tells us that energy is destroyed, for if we abstract from the experience of reality our idea of "energy", the only possible way to end up with this idea, and maintain in any way that the past has some reality, then though the past may still exist in terms of itself it certainly can not exist in terms of something else additionally, and so if the theory held water and, again, the past had any reality, then energy would actually increase instead of being conserved.

[Reciprocality]

It will not matter whether you think of those seconds (the first and last of the universe) linearly or volumetrically, the concept of the speed of light should imply the possibility of thinking about seconds in terms of volumes.

In reality however; even volumes wont suffice for the concept of time, for if it did then there could be no beginning of the universe nor any chaos theory. And so without matter and space you can think about time four-dimensionally, and with the addition of matter and space the second (the measured of time) will actually be a five dimensional entity.

What I say can sound weird since we have a personal relation to time as something entirely different than spatial, but this simply cuts away information of impersonal matters.