Patrick Bet David is a tremendous interviewer, seeing Andrew Tate's interview

[Leo Gura]

3 hours ago, Danioover9000 said:

@Leo Gura

   I take that after this blog post, you'll make a Andrew Tate philosophy part 2: How to overcome this BS ideology:

https://www.actualized.org/insights/andrew-tate-teaches-sex-trafficking

Nope, I got better things to do than argue with Tate acolytes.

[Carl-Richard]

2 hours ago, CARDOZZO said:

I think all members here on the forum should start making content.

We should spread more things out there.

There's a lot of bullshit on internet these days... oh god!

What — you want to add to that? ?

[StarStruck]

His brother got on that podcast too

 

[Dauntment]

21 minutes ago, StarStruck said:

His brother got on that podcast too

 

Of course! Anyone that understands the "industry" all hop in and collaborate with one another. Is this not obvious?

[Danioover9000]

@StarStruck @Dauntment

5 hours ago, StarStruck said:

His brother got on that podcast too

 

   If this is an example of sellouts, this is it boys.

[Danioover9000]

@lostingenosmaze

12 hours ago, lostingenosmaze said:

Here's what a 22-year old Tater with 3.7 million followers has to say about Tate's charges ?

Struggles and stutters reading an entire article and defends Tate by comparing him to OJ Simpson, holy shit

   YIKES! I'm so glad I've finally over that whole stream and online community, so toxic it's insane I didn't leave earlier. SHEESH.

[Danioover9000]

   Wait, is his trial still ongoing? How is it taking so long, and why are they letting Andrew Tate and his brother film themselves whilst in house arrest????

[charlie cho]

@Danioover9000 because logic even on lawful circuits need time to develop. Evidence and its connectivity needs time. Its not that hard to understand. Even if Andrew has done something unlawful, judges and lawyers need formulation. And formulation requires time. Its not that easy, mind you. You need to become more patient. 

And laws itself cannot convict Andrew Tate. Written words won't do justice. You have to really look at Andrew Tate objectively. Of course he was a fraud sexually in making money with sex cams. But don't just look at the surface value, look at what he has accrued, and did that create unlawful behavior? 

Unlawful behavoir is very difficult to define, and to rush in and call him out is very very unwise behavior. It lacks cirtical understanding of any situation. 

IDGAF if he manipulated his girlfriends to just make sex cams. That doesn't automatically mean he's 'unlawful'. If that is the case, I can't survive in the justice system, You can't, no one can't. More than this, I don't even care more for it even if Leo thinks this is wrong. 

And I don't care if most of you think hes a piece of shit. I dont care if hes unlawful. But he says tremendous truth than most of you, right now. To me, unlike most of you, truth is more important than mere words and laws.

Edited June 23, 2023 by charlie cho

[zurew]

1 hour ago, charlie cho said:

I dont care if hes unlawful.

Ohh please stop. Don't act like he will be inprisoned (if he will be, we will see), because he said some truth that the current justice system can't currently recognize/stomach.

If you really think that is the case I would like you to list all those "truths" that he said that violates the law.

 

1 hour ago, charlie cho said:

And I don't care if most of you think hes a piece of shit. I dont care if hes unlawful. But he says tremendous truth than most of you, right now. To me, unlike most of you, truth is more important than mere words and laws.

You act like a crazy fanboy who is totally blinded by his leader and you won't give a single fuck what you leader does as long as he will spout out some truth that you care about.

Even if it would be the case, that he would reveal some big Truth, you should still be able to call him out on his bullshit.

Your mind seem to be totally captured by the dude, which is super scary that even on this forum we can see a clear example of a crazy fan.

Edited June 23, 2023 by zurew

[charlie cho]

23 minutes ago, zurew said:

Ohh please stop. Don't act like he will be inprisoned (if he will be, we will see), because he said some truth that the current justice system can't currently recognize/stomach.

If you really think that is the case I would like you to list all those "truths" that he said that violates the law.

 

You act like a crazy fanboy who is totally blinded by his leader and you won't give a single fuck what you leader does as long as he will spout out some truth that you care about.

Even if it would be the case, that he would reveal some big Truth, you should still be able to call him out on his bullshit.

Your mind seem to be totally captured by the dude, which is super scary that even on this forum we can see a clear example of a crazy fan.

lol fine. Like your opinion matters to me in the first place.

And stop starting fights online if you have nothing to do in your life.

Edited June 23, 2023 by charlie cho

[zurew]

This is not a fight, I just descriptively stated the facts based on how devoted you are towards him.

If i would see any fan that goes this hard lets be it a Leo or a Jesus fan or whatever, I would point out how concerning that kind of admiration is.

Edited June 23, 2023 by zurew

[charlie cho]

3 minutes ago, zurew said:

This is not a fight, I just descriptively stated the facts based on how devoted you are towards him.

If i would see any fan that goes this hard lets be it a Leo or a Jesus fan or whatever, I would point out how concerning that kind of admiritation is.

@zurew stop projecting your idiocy to me. I didnt worship him. 

 

Andrew Tate spoke more truth online than you spewing attacks on me

[zurew]

True, I just cant handle the amount of truth he speaks.

 

Maybe one day I could become a devoted follower of his, so I will be able to overlook all the wrong things that he does, because only the truth matters nothing else.

[charlie cho]

32 minutes ago, zurew said:

True, I just cant handle the amount of truth he speaks.

 

Maybe one day I could become a devoted follower of his, so I will be able to overlook all the wrong things that he does, because only the truth matters nothing else.

lol, your desparation to make me an Andrew Tate devoter. Pathetic.

[zurew]

2 hours ago, charlie cho said:

I dont care if hes unlawful. But he says tremendous truth than most of you, right now. To me, unlike most of you, truth is more important than mere words and laws.

If you think the above is just a regular follower behaviour, then I don't know what to tell you. 

[charlie cho]

@zurew Then stop talking nonsense. You obviously need some help with this.

Edited June 23, 2023 by charlie cho

[zurew]

Sure, lets see how others will interpret your message.

[charlie cho]

@zurew again, doesn't know when to just be quiet. You do this not only to me, but to everyone else don't you? 

You're a waste of my time, I don't want to be wasting time on you. 

Hated people who waste other's time.

Lol, you don't even formulate any writing to argue with me, such a waste of space and time with yours. 

Edited June 23, 2023 by charlie cho

[Danioover9000]

@charlie cho

4 hours ago, charlie cho said:

@Danioover9000 because logic even on lawful circuits need time to develop. Evidence and its connectivity needs time. Its not that hard to understand. Even if Andrew has done something unlawful, judges and lawyers need formulation. And formulation requires time. Its not that easy, mind you. You need to become more patient. 

And laws itself cannot convict Andrew Tate. Written words won't do justice. You have to really look at Andrew Tate objectively. Of course he was a fraud sexually in making money with sex cams. But don't just look at the surface value, look at what he has accrued, and did that create unlawful behavior? 

Unlawful behavoir is very difficult to define, and to rush in and call him out is very very unwise behavior. It lacks cirtical understanding of any situation. 

IDGAF if he manipulated his girlfriends to just make sex cams. That doesn't automatically mean he's 'unlawful'. If that is the case, I can't survive in the justice system, You can't, no one can't. More than this, I don't even care more for it even if Leo thinks this is wrong. 

And I don't care if most of you think hes a piece of shit. I dont care if hes unlawful. But he says tremendous truth than most of you, right now. To me, unlike most of you, truth is more important than mere words and laws.

   What do you mean logic even on lawful circuits need time to develop? Do you think that laws are like electrical circuits? And why assume I'm lacking patience and how do you know I'm inpatient?

   Are you looking at Andrew Tate objectively? He was a fraud sexually in making money with sex cams, do you mean tax fraud via cryptocurrency and web cam girls business via coercion and pimp methods?

   If you IDGAF about him manipulating his girlfriends, why do you care more about Andrew Tate than the women he victimized and the business people he ripped off and avoiding paying his taxes?

   What do you mean truth? Truth from Andrew Tate, all that matrix talk and other red pill BS? What if ABSOLUTE TRUTH of this situation, is that Andrew Tate is a sex trafficking rapist who lies to his fans, the girls, and an egotistical person that thinks he can get away with everything from pimping to tax fraud? As a role modal, is Andrew Tate worth modelling for younger men, Andrew the pimping tax fraudster?

[charlie cho]

@Danioover9000

Are all pimps supposed to go to jail? Pimps as in 

A man who has many women he fucks.

But doesnt use them for prostitution.

But Andrew Tate did have the former.

Tate also made the women he was with do cams.

Cams were and are legal, tf women do it to themselves for fuck sake.

and Andrew coerced them?

Or isnt it very very simple for those girls to just tell Tate to "Fuck off I'm not doing this shit."

Then shall we say Tate hypnotized or manipulated the women? But how?

Are women so weak? Or idiotic?

If a fucking man tells a woman to take their clothes off in front of idiots; she has no strength to tell that man to fuck off?

And we call that woman a victim? How dare we?

Are you telling me those women couldn't tell Tate to "fuck off"?

Okay.

If they did not have power. I will leave people to be. Take the girls as the victim. Fair enough. This will only exacerbate the problem of prostitution. Because we now have catered to the weak woman who have caved into Tates suggestion to take their clothes off. Its a very simple question. And we have made those women heroes.

Such idiotic tropes. To make such women heroes is only an idolization of prostitution. Saying its okay to let women do onlyfans but leftists not calling out the company of onlyfans. 

You make heroes of these 'victims', you are admiting that women have no power to resist a simple question "take your clothes off in front of simps." 

Such demeaning to women. So antifeminist. I am for feminists, and for women.

To make these women who has accepted and said yes to Andrew Tate's stupid suggestions, however clever Tate was with his lies and manipulations, heroes and victims of crime, what are you truly saying to these women by making them win lawsuits?

We are telling those women "you are not able to say 'no' to a man, albeit very very clever, who suggests you to take your clothes off for simps."

How dare we say this to women! This is the most demeaning most arrogant thing we can tell these women. And we make these women weak and unresponsible for saying "yes" to an idiot suggestion!

Laws need logic. Of course its like a circuit! @Danioover9000

That is why there cannot be any justice in circuits! No justice can be written by words and statements!

But as the world isnt perfect, we write laws to try to create justice.

and the best way to make this is by circuits and algorithms!

circuits and algorithms and words and statements and logic are bound by time and space. Of course it needs time if its any good!

But at the same time, anyone who seeks justice in the 'written law' doesnt know what true justice is. 

Justice cannot be written or be said. Like the Dao cannot be written or said, the first fucking sentence of the Tao Te Ching!

For God's sake. People need to listen to these songs. Learn and try to learn from how Kelly Clarkson deals with her problems! She repents! 

Lol.

Edited June 23, 2023 by charlie cho