Patrick Bet David Offers Tucker Carlson $100M to join Valuetainment

[Phil King]

Thoughts? Do you think he would take the offer? Would he be more or less damaging on Valuetainment than on fox? 

[Danioover9000]

@Phil King

1 hour ago, Phil King said:

Thoughts? Do you think he would take the offer? Would he be more or less damaging on Valuetainment than on fox? 

   Patrick David is a scammer, fraudster, swindler, con artist and hustler, who ran an MLM pyramid scheme in the past, credit goes to Coffeezilla.

   Tucker should stay away from the guy if he did his research on him, not worth the deal.

Edited May 3, 2023 by Danioover9000

[Tanz]

They are more right-leaning than Tucker is, I don't think Tucker will go with them, and frankly speaking, 100 million dollars is too little for Tucker.  Despite what people feel about him, his viewership is tremendous.  

[Leo Gura]

Shameless

 

Edited May 3, 2023 by Leo Gura

[Whitney Edwards]

Tucker won't accept it.

[_Archangel_]

@Leo Gura When master of chronicle meets master of lie things ain't looking good i think...and it makes you wonder how many of these demons are still around and manipulative enough to not get caught...

Do you think official fact checkers are going to be a thing in the near future?
Wouldn't solve this mess but atleast it's a start.

Edited May 3, 2023 by _Archangel_

[Phil King]

46 minutes ago, _Archangel_ said:

Do you think official fact checkers are going to be a thing in the near future?

Who would fact check the fact checkers?

[_Archangel_]

@Phil King You would create a federation that periodically evaluates the work of these checkers, degrading or upgreding them based on their mistakes. Of course no system is perfect and there would be still room for possible corruption, but just by establishing this fundation we would benefit of more honest information by the media.

Moreover, what you are saying is like: "who judge the judges?". As i've said there is still space for corruption in these institutions but it is cerainly better to have the judicial system around then not.

 

[Guest Tobia]

@Phil King

17 hours ago, Phil King said:

Do you think he would take the offer? Would he be more or less damaging on Valuetainment than on fox? 

He should not take the $100M in 5 years offer.

Tucker should try to demand $150+M in 5 years given his massive audience and influence.

He is damaging because of his racist, xenofobic views on immigration and trans demonization but he was also the ONLY person on mainstream media who gave a voice to anti-war advocates and Assange's family.

Nobody on mainstream media except Tucker talked about the credible report by Seymour Hersh on the US bombing of NordStream 2.

[Roy]

On 5/2/2023 at 7:30 PM, Phil King said:

Thoughts? Do you think he would take the offer? Would he be more or less damaging on Valuetainment than on fox?

As degenerate as both of them are (although PAT has some useful knowledge to offer on specific topics), this would be a sound business decision. Tucker is good at what he does and would solidify a massive increase in audience and therefore revenue.

Edited May 4, 2023 by Roy