Robert F. Kennedy Jr. running for POTUS

[Jodistrict]

RFK Jr  exposes democrats and big tech censorship of him.

 

[Recursoinominado]

10 hours ago, Jodistrict said:

RFK Jr  exposes democrats and big tech censorship of him.

 

Good.

If you spread misinformation, you should be censored.

[Jodistrict]

Who decides what is misinformation?  

 

[Recursoinominado]

2 minutes ago, Jodistrict said:

Who decides what is misinformation?  

Science.

There are vast studies, SOLID studies disproving most (if not all) RFK allegations but he just ignores them in order to advance his narrative to sell books.

So, yeah, treat him for what he is, a brainwashed lunatic.

[Jodistrict]

1 hour ago, Recursoinominado said:

Science.

There are vast studies, SOLID studies disproving most (if not all) RFK allegations but he just ignores them in order to advance his narrative to sell books.

So, yeah, treat him for what he is, a brainwashed lunatic.

RFK always sites to the scientific literature and with his excellent memory actually gives you the source and author.   Also, other published scientists and doctors have been censored, not just RFK.   Who decides which side evaluating the scientific literature is misinformation? 

Edited July 28, 2023 by Jodistrict

[Recursoinominado]

22 minutes ago, Jodistrict said:

RFK always sites to the scientific literature and with his excellent memory actually gives you the source and author.  

Not all studies are equal, some are simply wrong due to weak methodology.

That's why you have to be strict with method and replicate the study, peer reviews etc.

Also, studies can be horribly misinterpreted, which is fairly common with morons like RFK.

Usually you can find one weak study to base your point with and ignore other 99 other way more solid studies that say the contrary.

Which is what those types do over and over.

His allegations has been debunked over and over and he NEVER changes his speech.

That alone says enough about his integrity.

I have posted several videos on this topic of serious scientists demolishing every single one of RFK alegations.

I will assume you purposedly ignored those videos in order to keep your cherished wrong opinions.

[Jodistrict]

1 minute ago, Recursoinominado said:

Not all studies are equal, some are simply wrong due to weak methodology.

That's why you have to be strict with method and replicate the study, peer reviews etc.

Also, studies can be horribly misinterpreted, which is fairly common with morons like RFK.

Usually you can find one weak study to base your point with and ignore other 99 other way more solid studies that say the contrary.

Which is what those types do over and over.

His allegations has been debunked over and over and he NEVER changes his speech.

That alone says enough about his integrity.

I have posted several videos on this topic of serious scientists demolishing every single one of RFK alegations.

I will assume you purposedly ignored those videos in order to keep your cherished wrong opinions.

Your sources deserve to be listened too.  And so does the other side.  But if you say something is misinformation, someone is making that determination and if they have power they can censor the other side.  The idea of "freedom of speech" is that there is no qualified "censor" but ideas have to be debated in the public square.  

    

[Recursoinominado]

49 minutes ago, Jodistrict said:

ideas have to be debated in the public square

They have been debated ad nauseam.

The answers are clear for anyone with a bit of integrity.

RFK aren't looking for the "truth", he is set in his bullshit until he is dead.

He is too commited to back out now.

He is making money and fame with it.

What are the chances he one day will be like "oh, i guess i was wrong"?

ZERO.

The danger in letting him speak freely is that he will drag thousands with him.

Many preventable deaths, hospitalizations and suffering will follow.

[Jodistrict]

 

38 minutes ago, Recursoinominado said:

They have been debated ad nauseam.

The answers are clear for anyone with a bit of integrity.

RFK aren't looking for the "truth", he is set in his bullshit until he is dead.

He is too commited to back out now.

He is making money and fame with it.

What are the chances he one day will be like "oh, i guess i was wrong"?

ZERO.

The danger in letting him speak freely is that he will drag thousands with him.

Many preventable deaths, hospitalizations and suffering will follow.

The bad motives that you are ascribing to him is not objective evidence unless you can read his mind.  How do you know this?  My proposition is to have freely available information and freedom of debate.  If you are correct, you will win out.  

[Recursoinominado]

42 minutes ago, Jodistrict said:

  How do you know this? 

The fact is that he will never win this election and he sell books on the topics he is ranting about.

He is making a LOT of money out of this + boosting his ego with all this attention.

I don't know, maybe he is a psychopath and just want to see the world burn.

[Hatfort]

With that voice, he was unelectable anyway.

They should have let him speak his damn 10 minutes, he's gonna play the victim now. The decision was fortunate for our ears though, that is a fact no one can refute.

[Recursoinominado]

2 minutes ago, Hatfort said:

With that voice, he was unelectable anyway.

They should have let him speak his damn 10 minutes, he's gonna play the victim now. The decision was fortunate for our ears though, that is a fact no one can refute.

He spoke for 9 minutes...

[Hatfort]

Just one less minute? Oh, not much.

[Jodistrict]

Robert Kennedy, Jr.  chats on Zoom with regular folks.

 

 

[Jodistrict]

This is an interesting interview with RFK, Jr. when he was younger.  You can here what he sounded like before he lost his voice.