Husseinisdoingfine

Why was Osho so against Homosexuality?

13 posts in this topic

Here's a whole article where he justifies calling it a perversion:

https://www.messagefrommasters.com/Shiva-Shakti/osho_on_homosexuality_perversion.htm


أشهد أن لا إله إلا الله وأشهد أن ليو رسول الله

Translation: I bear witness that there is no God but Allah, and Leo [Gura] is the messenger of Allah.

"Love is the realization that there no difference between anything. Love is a complete absence of all bias". -- Leo Gura

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's wrong if you look at it from nature's perspective but nature is not the highest thing. Love is higher than nature. People can love strange things. I sometimes love ugly rainy days.


I left this forum because a moderator has a problem with me talking positively about myself and giving advice. This reflects the forum as a whole. This place is negative, bitter, hateful and anti success. If you don't notice this that's because you're one of them. I hope some of you benefited from my posts. Take care.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Osho was spot on about most things, and even though there is truth to what he says, he did not always see with the greatest awareness.

To be fully enlightened and to be in a human body and interact with people about things is not possible, there needs to be a little sacrifice.

With that sacrifice comes a little imperfection, this makes us human... If someone achieved absolute perfection they would vanish.

Masters need to lets just say, 'tone-down' to be more relatable and you need 'ego' to interact with the world.

Otherwise all you can do is remain as a silent observer.


I AM the Eternal Child of Intelligent Infinity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How odd.

He says that homosexuals can't orgasm. And that kissing is gross as well, because it transmits germs, lol.

I think the only thing perverted and unnatural here is Osho's own perspective on sexuality.


Describe a thought.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Whilst I don’t know whether or not is take on homosexuality is correct, but his take on pornography I completely agree with.

https://www.messagefrommasters.com/Shiva-Shakti/osho_on_pornography.htm


أشهد أن لا إله إلا الله وأشهد أن ليو رسول الله

Translation: I bear witness that there is no God but Allah, and Leo [Gura] is the messenger of Allah.

"Love is the realization that there no difference between anything. Love is a complete absence of all bias". -- Leo Gura

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I do not know but when Osho speaks, I shut up and listen before disagreeing with him. If I catch myself disagreeing what he says, I question myself. He is no joker.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, Husseinisdoingfine said:

Here's a whole article where he justifies calling it a perversion:

https://www.messagefrommasters.com/Shiva-Shakti/osho_on_homosexuality_perversion.htm

Let's be real.

If you want to understand Osho's thinking, you can read his discourses.

Osho doesn't agree with all this nonsense you are probably super-imposing onto him (e.g. spiral dynamics).

Osho would disagree with color coded levels of consciousness where cultures that value LGBTQ rights are more highly advanced than others.

If that's your position, fine.

But don't confuse yourself by trying to project that onto Osho.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 21.4.2023 at 6:39 PM, Eyowey said:

It's wrong if you look at it from nature's perspective

Nature made homosexuality.


Intrinsic joy is revealed in the marriage of meaning and being.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't idealize enlightened people. What can be done before enlightenment can be done after it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Because at that time homosexuality was illegal in India. And most people agreed that it was a bad thing.

Don't impose your advanced morals onto people born decades ago where morality was not as advanced.

Same goes for women's rights, slavery etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Every diversion from Male-Female is wrong in the most basic sense, but we aren't on a stranded spaceship trying to rekindle human civilization somewhere now are we?


hrhrhtewgfegege

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now