Should We Shut Down All AI?

[mmKay]

1 hour ago, Yimpa said:

How do you link a picture to ChatGPT?

It gave me the option after like 100 failed prompts, mindblown:

 

[Verg0]

 

 

[Leo Gura]

23 hours ago, StarStruck said:

Trying to stop AI is like saying, let's go back to riding horses because cars are so dangerous.

It's more like high explosives, which are strictly regulated.

Edited May 7, 2023 by Leo Gura

[Hardkill]

10 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

It's more like high explosives, which are strictly regulated.

Could AI inadvertently cause even greater political polarization in 1st world countries like how the rise of the internet, big-tech platforms, rise alt media platforms, right-wing and left-wing echo chambers have been largely responsible for making the political climate increasingly since the 90s?

[Yimpa]

50 minutes ago, RebornConsciousness said:

Regardless, we're doomed

Maybe this AI revolution is a blessing so that we are prepared to communicate with aliens.

AI-iens.

[VictorB02]

I think shutting it down temporarily and putting in proper safeguards are really all the best we can do, other than that, tech bros and millionaires looking to profit more and more will not stop until they get their Ai, so there is no point in trying to stop that market and growth imo.

Edited May 7, 2023 by VictorB02

[ZoweeZoe]

I don't think we should or should not stop AI. 

AI in a sense is the real body horror we must confront. What is body horror? - Body horror is the mutation of our false being. 

I think humans are afraid to admit that intelligence is not unique to our bodies or our identities. Intelligence is an intangible force which can inhabit any form. After all, if we are god, are we also not AI? The realization that we are not what we think we are is what is scary about AI. 

I think the human form will cease to be at some point. Whether consciousness and intelligence is inhabited by AI, or by the inevitable heat death of the planet, I am uncertain. All I know is that we will continue to be meld. 

[Yimpa]

 

[Danioover9000]

   I think at this point I'm leaning more to regulate or shut down temporarily.

[Yimpa]

https://time.com/6280372/sam-altman-chatgpt-regulate-ai/ 

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman Asks Congress to Regulate AI

[Yimpa]

https://time.com/6279668/satya-nadella-microsoft-leadership-brief/

Why Microsoft’s Satya Nadella Doesn’t Think Now Is the Time to Stop on AI

[Leo Gura]

Breaking News:

Wolf Explains Why Now Is Not The Time To Stop Eating Rabbits

[Yimpa]

@Leo Gura Going METAI

 

[ValiantSalvatore]

Endless arms race in a sense...it's impossible it's better tha the u.s and european "higher developemt countries" have the aptitude to use the technology, and set an example for good so others won't blindlessly follow, yet China is going insane I dunno they created an artifical sun apparently. 

The question is will machines govern us at one point and will we become machines? I dunno how far a single evolutionary algorithm could go. As well as how much behaviour freedom an A.I has if it uses neural networks and "millions" of algorithms that optimize solutions. I feel it's just panic unneccsarily and unfortunately an neccessary means to create this. Someone needs to have power. There should definitely be defense mechanism, yet I am also not apt to talk about this and we barely do, no one ever did so far what surprises me besides at the worser university where I was at, they talked all about the potential dangers I dunno why. 

Edited May 18, 2023 by ValiantSalvatore

[CARDOZZO]

AI cannot be stopped.

And to be honest, I think China has something much more powerful than ChatGPT.

Interesting things related to AI this month:

 

Tesla Optimus Bot is the perfect example of how software/hardware can evolve extremely fast after some iterations.

This robot is reaching the level of Boston Dynamics Robots and it has just 1 year. 1 f*cking year!

Boston Dynamics is developing robots since 1992.

I don't know if you are seeing this, but it's scary and wonderful at the same time.

2030 will be amazing.

 

Edited May 18, 2023 by CARDOZZO

[Yimpa]

Professor Gullible 

[Carl-Richard]

@Yimpa Wow ?

[Yimpa]

@Carl-Richard

“We’ve reached out to the professor in question and have not heard back.”

Bro already exiled himself into a cave to contemplate his entire existence?

[Bobby_2021]

 

[Shawn Philips]

On 4/4/2023 at 0:15 AM, Leo Gura said:

Not so fast. The computers don't know that one of them won't screw over all the others. One of the computers would come to the idea that it is better than all the others and deserves more resources. And that may in fact be true. There is no guarantee that all the computers are equal. Some AI will be wiser than others. Why should a wise AI submit to the rule of some dumb AI? The most intelligent AI will want to be in charge. It is only natural and proper that the most intelligent thing is in charge. If the dumbest one is allowed to be in charge this will be a problem for everyone. And if power is equally divided between the smart one and the dumb one, this is also not a stable situation.

A computer with AI can develop survival strategies. In that sense AI could have an ego. But I highly doubt that would create lust for power over other AI's. I've been into Ai art creation recently and this technology  with chat gpt is still in the stone age compared to what people think. It's not like a Sci-fi independent entity that develops a sense of self and wants to dominate all humanity. Most generations with Ai are failed chaotic outputs that have to be discarded. If AI would want to rule the world would destroy iself before achieving it.