Heaven Paradigm Lock

[Dodo]

Hello, guys, 

In the most recent video, Leo explained how one can escape from a paradigm by being aware of the lock that holds the paradigm in place and putting it to the test. What is the best paradigm? The paradigm of switching paradigms? The paradigm of no paradigms?

So anyway, what holds us all to this life on planet Earth paradigm? Our bodies and minds? Do we need to put our bodies and minds to the test and escape this paradigm, or is that going too far?

What is the heaven (best) paradigm? The paradigm of truth (what does that even mean though)? The paradigm of Buddhism? Or is it  situational? The paradigm of the true self (being yourself, being), being yourself always, no matter what?

I would guess the most important thing for a paradigm would be to be accepting of all other paradigms, add this to your paradigms guys <3 peace and love <3 infinite om! Namaste

Edited March 9, 2017 by Dodoster

[Loreena]

I would prefer the paradigm that refers to being the best human being. So I will apply all principles that make up the paradigm to make myself the best version of who I can be/become. Heaven and hell don't matter to me so I don't need to bother about their paradigms. 

If paradigm refers to streams or ways of thinking and perspective/perception then I would prefer a switching paradigm versus a rudimentary basic paradigm because that way I become aware of every angle through which you're looking at the problem/situation/event/concept/idea/construct/plan etc. 

To be really open-minded is to accept and understand all paradigms. But the application of a paradigm is also important. If I apply a paradigm in the wrong place, then the outcome is useless. So I need to know when to switch and which one to switch to and apply the right one in the right place. 

[Nahm]

'

The paradigm of the best combination of paradigms, paradigm.

[Guest Annetta]

He was saying something about when someone enters a new "bubble", it's a really bad idea to have stuff from the old bubble enter the new one - do you think he means that new paradigms are ok as long as the baggage from the old one is discarded?  How can you discard it if you can't even see it though?