TreyMoney

Good Quality Red Pill Podcasts / Channels?

9 posts in this topic

Looking for good quality red pill podcasts / youtube channels?

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do yourself a favour and dont even start thank me later...


There is nothing safe with playing it safe.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@TreyMoney To help you not rot your mind and dig yourself bigger and bigger hole of pity ,then yeah its annoying in that way...


There is nothing safe with playing it safe.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, TreyMoney said:

Looking for good quality red pill podcasts / youtube channels?

Thanks

You can learn all of what it has to offer without immersing yourself in its culture. The culture of redpill is mostly designed by sketchy grifters to prey on desperate men

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, TreyMoney said:

... good quality ... red pill ...

those are mutually exclusive terms

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I do not promote in any way shape or form redpill ideology, but Patrice O'neal would be the definition of what you're asking for, with a comedic twist. I can listen to this guy for hours, his delivery is amazing. 

TAKE EVERYTHING WITH DISCERNMENT,  think for yourself and most of all, respect wamen.

RIP Patrice
 


 


This is not a Signature    [TBA]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Chris Wiliamson isn't 'red pill' per se but discusses dating dynamics and is writing a book called Mating Crisis. Very balanced guy.
 

 

The below is from Illimitable man blog.

''To fully live all the aspects of red pill philosophy in your life, you’d have to be incredibly immoral. Immoral to a degree that the vast majority of people are incapable of becoming without severely damaging themselves. Be that their mental health, physical health (drug usage) or both. To be amoral is to be psychopathic, because amorality is neutrality, it is factual, it is absent human emotion. Human action and intent is not amoral, only strategy/knowledge itself is. Do you see the disconnect there? If humans are emotional and amorality focuses on the realm devoid of emotion, then amorality is quite simply not a realm you operate in.

The world is not a fair place. Sometimes unvirtuous behaviour is a question of simple survival, but this needs no glorification. If it’s necessary, and you’re not simply indulging yourself, so be it. There’s a difference between stealing to eat, and stealing because “well, who’s gonna stop me?” Men who get the game, but choose not to steal other people’s girls or scam people out of money in manipulative sales pitches aren’t blue pillers; they simply have stronger moral principles than you do. Maybe they can afford to have those principles and live well, and you can’t. Maybe they enjoy being altruistic more than they enjoy being sadistic, and for you phenomenon is inverted; it is what it is.

Red pill philosophy is here to show you how the game works, not to tell you how to live your life. We give advice when asked, sure, but you live the way that suits you best; you own your choices.

The red pill philosophy is amoral in the sense that it says “it is what it is.”:

Hypergamy? It is what it is.
Branch swinging to the next best thing? It is what it is.
Alpha fucks, beta bucks? It is what it is.
Women have innate value whilst men don’t? It is what it is.

You can’t change these things, you can build a culture designed to subvert these things, but they’re not going anywhere. The reason the modern west is falling apart socially is because we don’t subjugate these things like we used to.

Peel back all the bullshit, and you see women, as well as a lot of men who utilise red pill philosophy, are immoral creatures. I don’t intend that to be a value judgement, but without getting into some nuanced philosophical/metaphysical argument and redefining what good and bad are (people always try to whore up my time with this nonsense,) we all know what good and bad is innately. I’m not going to debate you on technicalities to help you justify the virtue of what is otherwise deemed morally reprehensible.''

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now