do paradoxes exist

[Reciprocality]

"Up" and "down" do not exist in the universe, it exist in concept, it is actually you who says otherwise when you insist on the reality to which your notion of "paradox" is supposed to correspond. 

 

You expect of logic to give you something more than what were already given in your premises, this is literally logicism.

 

You probably even think that axioms are beliefs or propositions, but also this is false, axioms are the nature of indivisibles, they are self-subsistent, they are the condition for propositions or beliefs, this is what Godel actually discovered, axioms are immanent knowlegde, axioms are immanent truths.

Axioms are the creation of the metric itself, and only under the metric can we find consistency and inconsistency. 

[Reciprocality]

Implications to all this, which may become dry as hell but worthy of mentioning is that inference rules and things of this nature are all extra-logical, that is, that the literal field of logic is an investigation into something that is not logic by means of logic.

Logic becomes not principles of identity and non-contradictions but principles becomes immanence of identity and non-contradiction through the self-replicating nature of axioms and their self-subsistence in thought.

: ) it is beautiful stuff, you have no idea the highs I get from these insights, I thought Actualized.org were all about insight but as soon as it involves anything resembling an explication of the methods of insight, I get met with a wall of "logic bad", well I have news for you, no amount of storytelling will make it true that you become a mystic by rejecting how you think.