Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Proserpina

To What Extent Does Leo Still Believe That Flattening The Self is Useful on The Path?

10 posts in this topic

See this video for reference regarding the flattening idea for the self at 31:13: 

Please see Leo's comment 6 years ago under the video where he says:

Good work! Keep flattening yourself. There is much self to flatten ;)

In response to:

By the flattening of "myself" i realised that i'm just existence., :o phenomenal video Leo :D

....

Don't spare me any nuance here.  If any because it seems as though he doesn't flatten the self entirely in his current teachings.  

To what extent does Leo currently believe that one should not flatten the self?

Edited by Proserpina

???????

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In the current teachings, you inflate the illusion of yourself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm guessing the expectation here is that a self can be reduced or simplified. However, there is a lot of room for interpretation here. If a self can be flattened, then it must be composed of parts that make up a structure. I think there is some truth to this. The process of flattening would then involve collapsing that structure into something simpler or truer. In my own experience, I think the self comes and goes, returning when I become aware again that I am a self. So if I were to flatten my self, I would say that I am an "awareness of being a self", a pinprick of somethingness separate from everything else.

Therefore, I think the process of flattening is a personal one and not a universal truth. It is not clear that it should flatten to the same thing for everyone. If Leo flattens himself to God then that's his process.


57% paranoid

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@vladorion

15 hours ago, vladorion said:

In the current teachings, you inflate the illusion of yourself.

That's not true.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It sounds like you misunderstood. “Flatness” in any nondual spiritual context would merely refer to distance and separation being illusory.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, The0Self said:

It sounds like you misunderstood. “Flatness” in any nondual spiritual context would merely refer to distance and separation being illusory.

I don't understand how I could have misunderstood anything when I asked a question for understanding.  "Flatness in any nondual spiritual context" seems to be an overstatement on your part.  I'm asking what Leo thinks about this and whether there is any discrepancy between 6 years ago and today.  In my experience, by completely 'flattening' the self and external world you can inadvertently realize separation and distance to be illusory.  You realize you are existence itself. Which comports with what you said and with what the video commenter said which I quoted above. 


???????

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 hours ago, Proserpina said:

If any because it seems as though he doesn't flatten the self entirely in his current teachings.  

 

How do you know that?


"Not believing your own thoughts, you’re free from the primal desire: the thought that reality should be different than it is. You realise the wordless, the unthinkable. You understand that any mystery is only what you yourself have created. In fact, there’s no mystery. Everything is as clear as day. It’s simple, because there really isn’t anything. There’s only the story appearing now. And not even that.” — Byron Katie

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When you close your eyes at night and go to sleep, if you pay attention you flatten your sense of self. If you completely let go and do not dream....the sense of you is completely gone. So when he says flatten the self...think it terms of the surrendering you do every time you go to sleep. But....see if you can do that consciously. Can you be still at the same level you do when you sleep?


You are a selfless LACK OF APPEARANCE, that CONSTRUCTS AN APPEARANCE. But that appearance can disappear and reappear and we call that change, we call it time, we call it space, we call it distance, we call distinctness, we call it other. But notice...this appearance, is a SELF. A SELF IS A CONSTRUCTION!!! 

So if you want to know the TRUTH OF THE CONSTRUCTION. Just deconstruct the construction!!!! No point in playing these mind games!!! No point in creating needless complexity!!! The truth of what you are is a BLANK!!!! A selfless awareness....then that means there is NO OTHER, and everything you have ever perceived was JUST AN APPEARANCE, A MIRAGE, AN ILLUSION, IMAGINARY. 

Everything that appears....appears out of a lack of appearance/void/no-thing, non-sense (can't be sensed because there is nothing to sense). That is what you are, and what arises...is made of that. So nonexistence, arises/creates existence. And thus everything is solved.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

flattening oneself meant diluting the separation between you and what is not you. This separation occurs in the experience that is happening and is what we call the illusion of the self. I would say that Leo has a hard time flattening because he can't help but conceptualize. there is something strange in his way of integrating awakening, although I don't know exactly how to define it. in his case it seems that to flatten is for the whole experience to become self. But he has gone very deep, it's difficult to understand 

Edited by Breakingthewall

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your answers and for clearing up some confusion, guys.  


???????

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0