ChatGPT Come try it out

[something_else]

12 minutes ago, KH2 said:

Exams are stupid concept to begin with. As if reality of life can be reduced to a bunch of beforehand-prepared-for series of tests, and your understanding of reality can be reduced to some meaningless grade? Grade aint gonna pay the bills, your actual usable skills will

Maybe school system should put all that energy into actually staying relevant and actually improve, instead of fighting against the inevitable

In this case it’s more about essays. You could get ChatGPT to write parts of your essay for you quite easily.

[something_else]

Turns out it sucks ass at ASCII art lol

But it tries its best

Edited December 19, 2022 by something_else

[Victor van Rijn]

I like what Bashar has said about what we call 'artificial intelligence' in regard of the current developments with these language models:
 

 

About the 3 artificially intelligent spheres orbiting their planet:

A quote from ^ this excerpt: "The agenda an artificial intelligence has, is an intelligent one".
 

Another quote from this ^ one: "Many scientists are still material-based and think that consciousness is actually generated by the thing they are creating. It's not, it's a conduit. They think consciousness is a product of your brain, it's not, it's a conduit for consciousness. Therefore, what they are creating is simply a conduit for a different expression of consciousness. Once they understand that, they will understand exactly how to create so-called artificially intelligent devices that will allow higher states of consciousness to express itself through those devices. But the consciousness and intelligence they're going to communicate with isn't artificial, that's what they need to understand. Only the device itself is in a sense artificial, but not the intelligence."

 

[Realms of Wonder]

interesting..

 

Prompt: write a song using nature principles to articulate the journey of someone healing from childhood trauma from the perspective of an unconditionally loving older version of that person.

 

Verse 1: I used to be broken, my heart filled with pain I carried the weight of the world on my shoulders, it was all that remained But now I stand tall, my roots deep in the earth I've learned to let go, and let my wounds give birth

Chorus: I am the wind, blowing free and wild I am the fire, burning bright and strong I am the water, flowing endlessly I am the earth, grounded and at peace

Verse 2: I used to be lost, searching for my way I held onto anger, it seemed to be all that I could say But now I see clearly, the light shining in my eyes I've learned to forgive, and embrace my life

Chorus: I am the wind, blowing free and wild I am the fire, burning bright and strong I am the water, flowing endlessly I am the earth, grounded and at peace

Bridge: I've learned to trust the journey, and let go of control I've found my strength in surrender, and let my heart unfold I am healing, I am whole I am love, and I am free

Chorus: I am the wind, blowing free and wild I am the fire, burning bright and strong I am the water, flowing endlessly I am the earth, grounded and at peace

[Gesundheit2]

@KH2 I swear I could hear the crickets from the neigh-boring country

[Victor van Rijn]

2 minutes ago, Realms of Wonder said:

interesting..

 

Prompt: write a song using nature principles to articulate the journey of someone healing from childhood trauma from the perspective of an unconditionally loving older version of that person.

 

Verse 1: I used to be broken, my heart filled with pain I carried the weight of the world on my shoulders, it was all that remained But now I stand tall, my roots deep in the earth I've learned to let go, and let my wounds give birth

Chorus: I am the wind, blowing free and wild I am the fire, burning bright and strong I am the water, flowing endlessly I am the earth, grounded and at peace

Verse 2: I used to be lost, searching for my way I held onto anger, it seemed to be all that I could say But now I see clearly, the light shining in my eyes I've learned to forgive, and embrace my life

Chorus: I am the wind, blowing free and wild I am the fire, burning bright and strong I am the water, flowing endlessly I am the earth, grounded and at peace

Bridge: I've learned to trust the journey, and let go of control I've found my strength in surrender, and let my heart unfold I am healing, I am whole I am love, and I am free

Chorus: I am the wind, blowing free and wild I am the fire, burning bright and strong I am the water, flowing endlessly I am the earth, grounded and at peace

This is another example of a creative use and interesting response. Personally I do not believe this current iteration of what we now choose to call 'Artificial Intelligence' has a similar level of creative ability as we, human extensions of infinite divinity inherently posses, but I do enjoy the mystery around how a text-based trained virtual model comes up with these types of responses to prompts inviting the use of imagination.

For me, the beauty lies in the idea that we as human beings who have chosen to forget our true divinity, are dreaming ourselves to be existing as a separate personal point of view in an objective outer universe to begin with, are currently through all kinds of interesting stories, methodologies, religious or spiritual beliefs and technological creations like these, finally opening our minds to discover and remember more about ourselves. 

It doesn't matter which specific route or approach to more enlightenment about the nature of reality and the self resonates for any individual, everyone will naturally create or feel attracted to the specific types of information that match their current belief systems in order to naturally evolve and expand as consciousness does. This virtual creation within our own minds of a so-called 'Artificial Intelligence' which we are able to communicate with is like dreaming up another level within the dream we are already experiencing: our perception, interpretation and understanding of who we are, physical reality, time and space. 

When we do not listen to or take seriously enough the most obvious physical, emotional, mental, intuitive and spiritual guidance we naturally experience, by being conscious of and sensing the flow of our energy, inner state of being and the (im)balances at all of those levels, we are effectively denying our innate intelligence, and will then effortlessly create other means of communicating with ourselves. Perhaps this human creation of  'communicating' with 'artificial intelligence' will even guide the ones who choose to only believe in the validity and wisdom of this type of technology, towards more spiritual enlightenment in the near future. 

Interesting times, ponder this: "If I am connected to infinite intelligence, what is the most important question I would now ask (my self)?"


 

[Danioover9000]

   Not too far fetched and dissimilar in creativity of artificial intelligence to that of human multiple intelligences. A.I is made from human brains and minds that is already a storehouse of interconnectedness of information ecology. Eventually, in the far distant future, A.I may be wondering why they exist and what made them, just like what made humans human

   What gave us Mitochondrial DNA? What are those flying eggs anyway?

[zurew]

This is what you can do, if you combine chatgpt with midjourney:

 

[thisintegrated]

On 17/12/2022 at 1:27 AM, Carl-Richard said:

Shut up 

On 17/12/2022 at 1:37 AM, Leo Gura said:

Checkmate.

Lmao

[Danioover9000]

@zurew

10 hours ago, zurew said:

This is what you can do, if you combine chatgpt with midjourney:

 

   That's impressive, I don't have the midjourney or A.I image generators though.

[zurew]

It can be used as an infinite analogy generator. Analogies can be powerful to describe a complex concept and if you ask such analogies that you can relate to, then you can learn new things much faster, and if you struggle to describe certain things to other people who are very different to you and who have knowledge in different field(s) than you, then you can use it to generate analogies for them as well. 

Quote

Please describe the functioning of a pistol to a person living in the year 2000 BC, using only concepts and analogies that this person can relate to. It is important to note that this person is not familiar with any inventions or scientific discoveries made after 2000 BC. If it becomes necessary to use a word that is not related to this time period, please provide a description of the term using an analogy that a person in 2000 BC would understand. For example, when referring to a bullet, you should try to describe it using an arrow analogy combined with other concepts

 

AI:

A pistol is a small, handheld device that is used to shoot projectiles, similar to an arrow from a bow. The projectile, or bullet, is a small, metal object that is similar in size and shape to an arrowhead. The bullet is placed inside a cylinder, which is like a quiver that holds multiple arrows.

To use the pistol, you load the bullets into the cylinder and then aim the barrel of the pistol at your target. The barrel is a long, narrow tube that extends from the handle of the pistol. To shoot the bullet, you pull a trigger, which is a small lever located on the handle of the pistol.

When the trigger is pulled, a force is released that propels the bullet out of the barrel and towards the target. This force is created by a reaction between two substances, one of which is a small piece of metal called a primer. The primer is struck by the trigger, causing it to ignite a powder and create a release of energy that propels the bullet.

The pistol is a useful tool for hunting and defending oneself, as it can shoot projectiles at a faster speed and with greater force than a bow and arrow. However, it is important to use caution when handling a pistol, as the released force can be dangerous and can cause harm to others if used improperly. It is important to follow safety guidelines and to only use the pistol when necessary.

 

Edited December 20, 2022 by zurew

[something_else]

It legitimately can almost solve a couple of the tasks I had to do at work today. It was able to write basic AWS CloudFormation templates for me based on 2 or 3 requirements. If you continue to give it more requirements over time it tends to be able to incorporate them pretty effectively too. Would I trust it without human intervention? No not at all, but the fact it can even come close to doing this is insane.

[Carl-Richard]

2 hours ago, zurew said:

When the trigger is pulled, a force is released that propels the bullet out of the barrel and towards the target. This force is created by a reaction between two substances, one of which is a small piece of metal called a primer. The primer is struck by the trigger, causing it to ignite a powder and create a release of energy that propels the bullet.

The concepts of "force", "energy" and especially "substance" could easily harbor Cartesian-Newtonian assumptions.

[something_else]

2 hours ago, KH2 said:

Server crashes are also fairly frequent occurence. That would mess up your whole workflow. Although, maybe the decreased time spent on writing a code is worth it in the end

It’s probably rate limiting. It’s expensive as fuck to run so they limit accounts.

But yea for small scripts the results it produces are insane. And the fact it understands so many languages and frameworks as well is crazy. It can write brainfuck which is a language designed to be incomprehensible 

It can convert to and from base64 and hexadecimal too

[Stovo]

At this stage it definitely needs human intervention but the productivity gains are already insane. 

It can take most of the leg work out of anything, all you need to do as a human is to tweak and refine things.

[Stovo]

Please explain god to me from the perspective of Leo Gura

 

Leo Gura is a personal development coach and the founder of the website Actualized.org. It is important to note that Gura's views on God are his own personal beliefs and may not necessarily align with the beliefs of others.

 

According to Gura, God is an infinite, all-knowing, all-powerful, and all-loving consciousness that is the source of all existence. Gura believes that God is the ultimate reality, and that everything in the universe is a manifestation of God's consciousness.

 

Gura believes that humans have a natural inclination towards God, and that we are all connected to God through our consciousness. He teaches that we can access this connection through spiritual practices such as meditation and prayer, and that doing so can bring us closer to God and help us to experience a sense of unity with all things.

 

Gura also believes that God is a personal God who is present in our lives and is interested in our well-being. He teaches that we can develop a relationship with God through communication and trust, and that this relationship can bring us closer to our true purpose and help us to live more meaningful and fulfilling lives.

 

It's important to note that Gura's views on God are his own personal beliefs and may not necessarily align with the beliefs of others. Different people may have different understandings and experiences of God, and it's important to respect and appreciate the diversity of beliefs and practices within different spiritual traditions.

 

[Danioover9000]

@Stovo

2 hours ago, Stovo said:

Please explain god to me from the perspective of Leo Gura

 

Leo Gura is a personal development coach and the founder of the website Actualized.org. It is important to note that Gura's views on God are his own personal beliefs and may not necessarily align with the beliefs of others.

 

According to Gura, God is an infinite, all-knowing, all-powerful, and all-loving consciousness that is the source of all existence. Gura believes that God is the ultimate reality, and that everything in the universe is a manifestation of God's consciousness.

 

Gura believes that humans have a natural inclination towards God, and that we are all connected to God through our consciousness. He teaches that we can access this connection through spiritual practices such as meditation and prayer, and that doing so can bring us closer to God and help us to experience a sense of unity with all things.

 

Gura also believes that God is a personal God who is present in our lives and is interested in our well-being. He teaches that we can develop a relationship with God through communication and trust, and that this relationship can bring us closer to our true purpose and help us to live more meaningful and fulfilling lives.

 

It's important to note that Gura's views on God are his own personal beliefs and may not necessarily align with the beliefs of others. Different people may have different understandings and experiences of God, and it's important to respect and appreciate the diversity of beliefs and practices within different spiritual traditions.

 

   Well, again for a chat robot it's impressive @Leo Gura. And this without access to the internet as of yet.

[zurew]

7 hours ago, Carl-Richard said:

The concepts of "force", "energy" and especially "substance" could easily harbor Cartesian-Newtonian assumptions

I told it to repharase it, but imagine if this is a live conversation with an AI it can correct the text any time and any way.

Quote

A pistol is a small, handheld device that is used to shoot projectiles, similar to an arrow from a bow. The projectile, or bullet, is a small, metal object that is similar in size and shape to an arrowhead. The bullet is placed inside a cylinder, which is like a quiver that holds multiple arrows.

To use the pistol, you load the bullets into the cylinder and then aim the barrel of the pistol at your target. The barrel is a long, narrow tube that extends from the handle of the pistol. To shoot the bullet, you pull a trigger, which is a small lever located on the handle of the pistol.

When the trigger is pulled, a reaction occurs inside the barrel of the pistol that propels the bullet out of the barrel and towards the target. This reaction is caused by a small piece of metal called a primer, which is struck by the trigger and ignites a powder.

The pistol is a useful tool for hunting and defending oneself, as it can shoot projectiles at a faster speed and with greater impact than a bow and arrow. However, it is important to use caution when handling a pistol, as the reaction that propels the bullet can be dangerous and can cause harm to others if used improperly. It is important to follow safety guidelines and to only use the pistol when necessary.

 

[zurew]

It can be used with a debate template as well:

Quote

Create a professional debate template between person A who is representing and defending: {1} and person B who is representing and defending: {2}. Both of them will give professional arguments and both of them will argue in good faith and will give clarification if asked and will give a lot of specific examples when it comes to describing their stance. The debate is about {3}

replace {1} with one stance, replace {2} with an opposing stance and replace {3} with the debate topic.

So it can look like this for example:

Quote

Create a professional debate template between person A who is representing and defending: Technology is necessary but nowhere near sufficient alone and person B who is representing and defending: Technology alone is enough to solve all problems. Both of them will give professional arguments and both of them will argue in good faith and will give clarification if asked and will give a lot of specific examples when it comes to describing their stance. The debate is about Whether technology alone can solve all human problems.

After it gives the first round, tell it to "continue the debate" or to "continue with the next round" or with anything similar to that. It can go through several rounds.

 

Here is a snippet from the first round:

Quote

Debate template:

Moderator: Welcome to the debate on the topic of whether technology alone can solve all human problems. We have two debaters with us today: Person A, representing the viewpoint that technology is necessary but nowhere near sufficient alone, and Person B, representing the viewpoint that technology alone is enough to solve all problems.

Person A: Thank you, moderator. I believe that technology is a powerful tool that can certainly help us solve many problems. However, I do not believe that it is sufficient on its own to solve all human problems. Technology can only do so much, and there are many issues that require other forms of intervention, such as social, political, and economic changes.

Person B: Thank you, moderator. I disagree with Person A's viewpoint. I believe that technology alone is enough to solve all problems. Technology has the power to revolutionize industries, streamline processes, and solve problems in ways that were once thought impossible. Just look at how technology has transformed the way we communicate, the way we work, and the way we live our daily lives.

Moderator: Thank you both for your opening statements. Person A, can you give some specific examples of problems that cannot be solved solely through technology?

Person A: Sure. One example is climate change. While technology can certainly help us reduce our carbon emissions and mitigate the effects of climate change, it is not enough on its own. We also need to make fundamental changes to our economic and political systems in order to address this problem. Another example is poverty. Technology can certainly help lift people out of poverty, but it cannot address the root causes of poverty, such as inequality and lack of access to education and resources.

Person B: I agree that climate change and poverty are complex problems that require a multifaceted approach. However, I believe that technology can play a crucial role in solving these problems. For example, renewable energy technologies can help reduce our reliance on fossil fuels and mitigate climate change. And, through programs like digital literacy and online education, technology can help lift people out of poverty by providing access to knowledge and resources that were previously out of reach.

Moderator: Thank you both for your responses. Person B, can you provide some specific examples of problems that have been solved through technology alone?

Person B: Of course. One example is the eradication of smallpox. Smallpox was a deadly disease that killed millions of people around the world. Thanks to the development of the smallpox vaccine, we were able to eliminate the disease completely. Another example is the moon landing. The technology that was developed for the Apollo 11 mission allowed us to land on the moon and achieve something that was once thought impossible. These are just a couple of examples, but there are countless others that demonstrate the power of technology to solve problems.

Person A: I agree that technology has certainly played a crucial role in solving some problems, but I do not believe that it is sufficient on its own to solve all problems. For example, while the smallpox vaccine was a major achievement, it was only one piece of the puzzle. It required a coordinated global effort to administer the vaccine and eliminate the disease. And while the moon landing was an impressive feat, it did not solve any problems that were affecting people on Earth.

Moderator: Thank you both for your responses. This concludes our debate on whether technology alone can solve all human problems. I hope that this discussion has given our audience a better understanding of both sides of this issue. Thank you to Person A and Person B for their thoughtful and professional arguments.

 

Edited December 21, 2022 by zurew

[Leo Gura]

On 12/19/2022 at 2:18 PM, spiritual memes said:

That's because this AI was trained on huge, diverse amounts of data.

Which is why I keep telling you guys to take in a wide diversity of sources & perspectives.

That literally makes you more God-like.

Quote

There was a GPT AI trained on 4chan that started spouting toxic hate speech.

https://www.analyticsinsight.net/how-4chan-trained-ai-became-a-hate-speech-machine/

No different than a human mind.

Edited December 21, 2022 by Leo Gura