Freaks of Nature Mega-Thread

[Sugarcoat]

Me

[Davino]

2 hours ago, Leo Gura said:

My whole life is about deconstructing illusions and her whole life is about playing inside illusions. 

Isn't that the essence of masculine transcendence VS feminine immanence? 

I got this insight from a Salvia trip with my girlfriend. It made me understand a crucial component and preference in the way I do spirituality. In a way, the masculine seeks eternal transcendence. In a way, the feminine seeks shapeshifting immanence. It's the same axis opposite directions, that's how I discovered the Inverse of consciousness. In case anything said resonated with you, contemplate deeper into why the transcendental approach should be better than the immanent and may strange loops come in handy to lubricate the mind.

Sorry for deviating the thread, you can hide it after you read it.

Edited December 29, 2024 by Davino

[ryandesreu]

4 hours ago, Leo Gura said:

This is so creepy.

They have TMNT in their family tree.

[Schizophonia]

On 28/09/2022 at 4:28 AM, Leo Gura said:

how spiritual masters are

Being a spiritual master doesnt ask being particularly cognitively developped. 

[Nilsi]

https://www.openculture.com/2018/08/pablo-picassos-masterful-childhood-paintings-precocious-works-painted-ages-8-15.html

Edited December 29, 2024 by Nilsi

[Leo Gura]

@Nilsi I could paint you a chicken like that in 3 minutes.

Where is my documentary?

Edited December 29, 2024 by Leo Gura

[Carl-Richard]

36 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

@Nilsi I could paint you a chicken like that in 3 minutes.

Where is my documentary?

Try painting this:

By Jan Esmann

https://arthur.io/art/jan-esmann/untitled-5

[Nilsi]

8 hours ago, Leo Gura said:

@Nilsi I could paint you a chicken like that in 3 minutes.

That’s cap, and honestly, it’s the default reaction to modern art from people who can’t grasp anything beyond surface-level technical skill or something blatantly emotional or suggestive.

Sure, a Picasso painting isn’t “terribly technical” or immediately obvious in its intent, but that’s the point. That’s why I included this bit about his youth - he mastered realism (what you probably think of as “real” art) by his early teens and then spent the rest of his career innovating, pushing past technical perfection and shallow emotionality to explore what art could truly become.

Edited December 30, 2024 by Nilsi

[Princess Arabia]

 

[Davino]

12 hours ago, Leo Gura said:

@Nilsi I could paint you a chicken like that in 3 minutes.

Where is my documentary?

Cringe 

[Davino]

3 hours ago, Nilsi said:

That’s cap, and honestly, it’s the default reaction to modern art from people who can’t grasp anything beyond surface-level technical skill or something blatantly emotional or suggestive.

Sure, a Picasso painting isn’t “terribly technical” or immediately obvious in its intent, but that’s the point. That’s why I included this bit about his youth - he mastered realism (what you probably think of as “real” art) by his early teens and then spent the rest of his career innovating, pushing past technical perfection and shallow emotionality to explore what art could truly become.

Leo made that same explanation in one of his videos. His intellegence goes further than his heart I guess.

[Princess Arabia]

 

[ryandesreu]

3 hours ago, Princess Arabia said:

 

Unbearable 

[- Adam -]

On 30/12/2024 at 4:17 PM, ryandesreu said:

Unbearable 

That sensationalist YouTuber tone 🤮