Effect of Actualized.org

[AtheisticNonduality]

The current world population (estimated obviously) is 7,969,984,120.

The current Actualized subscriber count (rounded) is 1,100,000.

That means Actualized subscriber to world population ratio is 1:7245.44010909.

Which means that the Actualized subscriber count is multiplied by 7245.44010909 to reach the world population, because Actualized is in the millions and millions times thousands is billions (ie. millions, then tens of millions, then hundreds of millions, then billions, so 1 subscriber per 7245.44010909 random other people or all subscribers per 7,969,984,120 because 7,969,984,120/7245.44010909 = 1,100,000 and 1,100,000 x 7245.44010909 = 7,969,984,120).

But we have to narrow the system down to the subscriber base, which only is constituted by some tens of thousands of people, which means we have to divide by hundreds from the millions that make up the full subscription count.

Today is Sep. 2, and the video of Leo's released closest to a year ago is "Understanding Bias - Bias, Love, and Mind Explained." So if we take up all of the videos' view counts from then to now, across the past year, the average video viewership is:

Views per video:

65555.5555556, because 59000 + 63000 + 55000 + 91000 + 55000 + 49000 + 91000 + 61000 + 56000 + 165000 + 93000 + 78000 + 49 000 + 37000 + 103000 + 60000 + 55000 + 37000 + 65000 + 63000 + 61000 + 86000 + 66000 + 64000 + 50000 + 33000 + 25000 = 1770000, which divided by 27 = again 65555.5555556.

Views per day:

4889.50276243, because 59000 + 63000 + 55000 + 91000 + 55000 + 49000 + 91000 + 61000 + 56000 + 165000 + 93000 + 78000 + 49 000 + 37000 + 103000 + 60000 + 55000 + 37000 + 65000 + 63000 + 61000 + 86000 + 66000 + 64000 + 50000 + 33000 + 25000 = 1770000, which divided by 362 (not 365 because a full year hasn't elapsed since the bias video; we're three days away) = again 4889.50276243.

Progress

If we want to check on the progress, we can divide the 27 in halves of 13.5, meaning the heavy metal detox video (and its view count) will be carved in two to separate the year's videos. So, 59000 + 63000 + 55000 + 91000 + 55000 + 49000 + 91000 + 61000 + 56000 + 165000 + 93000 + 78000 + 49 000 + 18500 = 983500 / 13.5 = 72851.85185 and 18500+ 103000 + 60000 + 55000 + 37000 + 65000 + 63000 + 61000 + 86000 + 66000 + 64000 + 50000 + 33000 + 25000 = 786500 / 13.5 = 58259.25926.

First half of the videos had an average of 72,851.85185 views, whereas the second had an average of 58,259.25926. 72,851.85185 views - 58,259.25926 views = 14,592.59259, so there was a decline of that amount. But this is negligible if it's uncontrollably part of a system external to the Actualized output itself, if it's unrelated to the quality or quantity of the videos, or if it doesn't matter if the quality of the videos somehow affects the quantity of the viewership (perhaps the quality of the viewership went up despite the quantity going down).

Anyway the total average viewership for it was/is 65555.5555556 per video and 4889.50276243 divided along the days. If Leo has exactly 65,555.5555556 followers () then that means the ratio of following individuals to the collective of the entire world is 65,555.5555556:7,969,984,120 or 1:121576.0289. As predictable by the subscriber count (millions' place) descending to the actual following (tens of thousands' place), which is a jump by a ratio of hundreds, the ratio of subscriber to world population (ones to thousands) fell to the ratio of actual follower to world population (ones to hundreds of thousands).

One actual Actualized follower exists against 121,576.0289 random other people.

Hypothetical Effects / Spreading Calculations (Still Preliminary)

1 Actualized follower might have their number of close friends in the ones or tens place (1-10 close friends). If the ideas spread from the 1 to the 10, that is 100% to 1000%, a total of 1100% then and a 900% increase of the ideas' flow. Now obviously the ideas will become less condensed and even less pure as they spread, but at their cores they will still exist in the spread; so the percentages make sense as long as the ideas survive. Also if you take into consideration the concepts of the Dunbar Effect, to some extent the ideas may even spread flowingly not just by a ratio of 1 to 10 but by 1 to 150, or even more. So that means the number of human beings under the most direct effects of Actualized's ideas are in definite actuality the 65,555.5555556 and in potentiality 65,555.5555556 x 150 + 65,555.5555556, which is 9,833,333.33334 + 65,555.5555556 = 9,898,888.8889. If we leave it to just close friends (somewhere from 1 to 10 close friends of each follower), then it's 65,555.5555556 x 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8. 9, or 10 (plus itself), which is a range of 131,111.111111 to 721,111.111112.

Now assume some small percentage of exceptional individuals reveals themselves out of all this and has an even greater effect.

 

Now for the views per day count, of 4889.50276243 per 362 (or 4930.023504 for 365 days in a full year), that's a series of interactions. Some series of actions are more significant than others. But these have to be made to count.

 

. . .

 

 

 

 

Edited September 2, 2022 by AtheisticNonduality

[Nilsi]

Would these 10 million people even differ from a random sample of the whole population in any meaningful way? I doubt even the 1 million followers are all that different from the general population. Idk, I dont think I quite get what your point is tbh lol.

[AtheisticNonduality]

17 minutes ago, Nilsi said:

Would these 10 million people even differ from a random sample of the whole population in any meaningful way? I doubt even the 1 million followers are all that different from the general population. Idk, I dont think I quite get what your point is tbh lol.

Maybe I'm being too optimistic, but I don't think so. I'm thinking in terms of butterfly effects. Even if we have one serious Actualized follower per a few hundred thousand people, the result could be profoundly effective.

And it's interesting to see the numbers.

[zurew]

I know the context here is only actualized.org, but a lot of actualized.org ideas are not unique to only actualized.org, so the butterfly effect is even greater than these numbers. Of course, it would be much harder to count more channels into this mix.

Edited September 2, 2022 by zurew

[Nilsi]

11 hours ago, AtheisticNonduality said:

Maybe I'm being too optimistic, but I don't think so. I'm thinking in terms of butterfly effects. Even if we have one serious Actualized follower per a few hundred thousand people, the result could be profoundly effective.

And it's interesting to see the numbers.

Sure, although I would argue that one serious stage yellow person working on climate change or whatever per hundred thousand people probably has a bigger effect on society, than some extremely conscious Übermensch.

[Bojan V]

Why am I dreaming this figment of my imagination which i don't understand??

[Razard86]

2 hours ago, Bojan V said:

Why am I dreaming this figment of my imagination which i don't understand??

Because you are supposed to be playing with a ball of yarn. https://www.actualized.org/insights/strange-loop-cat