Synchronicity and Alignment

[Galyna]

Guys,

 

How can you explain this interesting phenomenon: as your understanding of reality evolving, let’s say as you get more “deeper into the awakening” process, the universe gives exactly that block of information that is needed at this particular time for “your” evolution?

For ex: now, everywhere I go, every YT video I watch, everything screams that there are no others. I remember 3 years ago, I was desperately searching for this info everywhere to confirm and could not find. Like I could not find, I was asking desperately.

Now as I’ve become directly aware of this fact, I have been receiving this info from every corner I go.

We can call it “Synchronicity”, but are there any other explanation? This is crazy.

[Reciprocality]

We are progressing towards the future by synthesizing the information which we reduce or compartmentalize retrospectively when that has become the past.

Synchronicity is a feeling we have when analyzing something which once created us. Or is taken out of that which has created us.

Do you see how the output of prior synthesis is necessarily such that it feeling like we "are getting precisely the block of information we need"? You are speaking about teleology, many more should.

Edited April 29, 2022 by Reciprocality

[Reciprocality]

Teleology is a backwards causation theory for many, typically indicating intelligent design (a tree were once made so it could serve a purpose in making books, stones are made for humans to throw, the foot is made for sandals), to me it is mere meta-cognition, the understanding that the universe could never have been if it had no direction, that the universe as idea is an effect of some mystical direction.

Or that something is pulling us as much as objects in intelligence seems to have pushed us, like the sun or big bang.

So how does this relate to your post? Everything in your evolution necessitates where you end up, analyzing your prior direction adds up to where you have become.

[aurum]

2 hours ago, Galyna said:

How can you explain this interesting phenomenon: as your understanding of reality evolving, let’s say as you get more “deeper into the awakening” process, the universe gives exactly that block of information that is needed at this particular time for “your” evolution?

It’s infinite intelligence. YOUR infinite intelligence, ultimately.

All things are known. To enjoy this human experience, we limit ourselves. Yet we are never truly cut off from that which guides all things because we are it. To get cut off is impossible. Even an experience of being “cut off” is more proof that you’re connected.

2 hours ago, Galyna said:

We can call it “Synchronicity”, but are there any other explanation? This is crazy.

It’s certainly seems crazy from our finite perspective, especially if you haven’t considered such things before.

I personally however no longer like to refer to it as “crazy”. This is how life works. Expect it. Know it.

[Harsh Bagdia]

2 hours ago, Galyna said:

the universe gives exactly that block of information that is needed at this particular time for “your” evolution?

Yes this is true in my experience. Only retrospectively you realize how every event and every thought is put exactly at the perfect time leading to you being more of your authentic self. 

 

To move more and more into alignment what I figured out is not to question the guidance too much and even if we question it, still go with it. With more and more synchronicities popping up, it gets fun and more we realize how intelligently it's designed. 

It's wonderful that you are receiving content about non-duality with such ease. Greetings!!

2 hours ago, Galyna said:

We can call it “Synchronicity”, but are there any other explanation? This is crazy.

Yes "Synchronicity" may seem as "Luck" but it's actually physics. Nothing random in it. With enough awareness we see the correlation between the thoughts we are having, what we are feeling and what is manifesting in physical experience. 

Any other explanation? Well its God!!!!!!!!! 

It's God saying welcome. Welcome to the new level of mysticalness.

[Galyna]

15 hours ago, Aleister Crowleyy said:

Seek out a psychiatrist or a specialist. This is abnormal.

Why is this abnormal? Can you elaborate, please? 

[Galyna]

19 hours ago, Reciprocality said:

Teleology is a backwards causation theory for many, typically indicating intelligent design (a tree were once made so it could serve a purpose in making books, stones are made for humans to throw, the foot is made for sandals), to me it is mere meta-cognition, the understanding that the universe could never have been if it had no direction, that the universe as idea is an effect of some mystical direction.

Or that something is pulling us as much as objects in intelligence seems to have pushed us, like the sun or big bang.

So how does this relate to your post? Everything in your evolution necessitates where you end up, analyzing your prior direction adds up to where you have become.

Thanks for your feedback, I will be honest, was a bit hard to read message, needed to read a few times

you said: Synchronicity is a feeling we have when analyzing something which once created us.

What do you mean exactly? Has there ever be a creation? Us? How does this creation work? Does it start at some point A and goes to some point B? Implies time?

Synchronicity is a connectivity for me, everything is infinitely connected. Synchronicity is a reflection of Being everywhere. It plays with itself through itself. It mirrors your inner with your outer. It mirrors your experience and creates the match in external reality. 

[Galyna]

17 hours ago, Harsh Bagdia said:

Only retrospectively you realize how every event and every thought is put exactly at the perfect time leading to you being more of your authentic self. 

Bingo!

17 hours ago, Harsh Bagdia said:

It's wonderful that you are receiving content about non-duality with such ease. Greetings!!

I am so excited, it is a pure miracle and magic, I want Being talk to this illusory Itself all the time  but I cannot force it or wish it. LOL

 

17 hours ago, Harsh Bagdia said:

It's God saying welcome. Welcome to the new level of mysticalness.

Amen.

[Reciprocality]

2 hours ago, Galyna said:

you said: Synchronicity is a feeling we have when analyzing something which once created us.

What do you mean exactly? Has there ever be a creation? Us? How does this creation work? Does it start at some point A and goes to some point B? Implies time?

@Galyna We think that it created us because we can impose our pure empty awareness into memories of our past, this is the reason we identify with who we were in our representation of the past in memory.

The idea that we were created prior to our presence (now) is not made merely out of the parts which comprises this idea at presence, if that composition of elements were enough then we could push ourself back to some initial condition out of which we were created, to return at will at any moment.

That these elements are not enough to create us does not mean they were not essential for us to be created, we are retrospectively analyzing the idea of our house, our family, our friends, (the empirical condition for these things, touch, smell, sight) our sensibility of shape, space etc. In doing this we see subsistent and essential elements of our existence, without these we would not be at this place we are now with these extremely peculiar characteristics, it feels like we are precisely were we are supposed to be because its disjunction or alternative to being where we are is synthetic or additive by means of it.

This creation does not imply time, instead time is essential to the idea of the creation, the implication goes the other way around. Time is necessarily implicated in consciousness, as is space.

I am not saying that we are in any way seeing how we were created, but we are analyzing its ingredients. We are capable of saying what our creation must necessarily have, without saying how it is done. I do not think it makes sense to conclude regarding how we are created for the same reason we do not know what it is like (or what it means) to be independent of us, such as materialists considers a stone to be independent of us or theists considers god to be independent of us.

I do not think there has been an absolute creation if you were asking that, for I consider nothingness to be impossible (this I actually know) and emptiness to be a mutual contingency to whatever fills it.

Edited April 30, 2022 by Reciprocality

[Aaron p]

ive had some mad syncs. with spoken words...i would be communicating something to someone and say a word at the exact same time as the word is spoken by someone on tv. 

 

There was this one time where this guy i knew started talking to me about "cosmic energy" as the energy of the room got...more excited...unconsciously...the few of us that were there started feeling increased...energy...and laughing more and more and we had to stop ourselves as if we were being forced. Then me and the fried randomly spat out 3 exactly the same words at the same time...i cant remember what they were but that was weird

[Galyna]

40 minutes ago, Aaron p said:

ive had some mad syncs. with spoken words...i would be communicating something to someone and say a word at the exact same time as the word is spoken by someone on tv. 

wow, that's a hardcore....

[Reciprocality]

2 hours ago, Galyna said:

Synchronicity is a connectivity for me, everything is infinitely connected. Synchronicity is a reflection of Being everywhere. It plays with itself through itself. It mirrors your inner with your outer. It mirrors your experience and creates the match in external reality. 

@Galyna I am almost giving half my best here, so do not be angered if you do not get where I am going, if you get pieces here and there that is all I would expect, and if you do not want to respond to it that is fine.

Well yes, the problem is that many who says what you just said think that things are disjoined in themselves and then connected in some cosmological mind trough pure speculation, instead everything is phenomenally singular first (substance) and then divided into discrete elements in intelligence to then be combined into a philosophic architecture constituting a belief system. All this inheres in the ultimate substance of empty awareness, to which the ego is an essence and empirical magnitudes, imagined magnitudes, thoughts.. all accidents.

 

How can x diverge from itself without being imposed by something y outside it?

The only way is if x is both the absolute, a necessity and of a will.

That is, a will which can not take itself away but only change itself according to rules which does not take itself away, if it is not a will that potentiates then everything must have finished to completion by already being actual, prior to potential.

In intelligence everything is first actual G then it is considered potential t because actual T followed it. So how come one may allow a theory of a potential which seems to be prior to what is actual such as a will? The answer is that metatime does not follow the rules of time, that metatime is a four(?) dimensional entity such that a will can be allowed to potentiate it without being prior to it but with it.

Our only problem with this argument is that the nature of our own will is imposed on that which is hypothesized as beyond it, so if the argument stands then we are demigods, as in essential and subsistent to the power of god. 

So how can we in our totality be subsistent elements of our intelligence which is less than us in total, which this argument entails, the answer is if and only if there is such a thing which can never be incorporated by us, which is independent of us, yet non the less is represented by us in our very thinking. 

 

Substance: Everything without reflection, that which is both something and present without being divided, but not a pure mathematical construct which also is undivided.

Subsistence/Inherence: Something (x) of X or an element of a particular substance, it is either accidental or essential to the substance, though it is nothing without the substance to which it is either or. That in cursive is what makes it subsistence and not merely an element.

Essence: That without which a substance loses all meaning.

Element: that which can either be accidental or essential to a given substance whether or not it is subsistent to it.

Emptiness: that in which the magnitude of a substance may go in or out of consciousness, which still is conscious.

Independent: That which is regardless of a given consciousness, in some hypothetical reality, that which due to its hypothetical nature in intelligence is not at all to the solipsist.

Will: That which alters or creates causation in presence in some direction that is considered the future to beings of sensible time.

Future: That which is anticipated as a continuum of various magnitudes, which at presence it always mystical.

Intelligence: That which mystically creates synthetic identity out of what is retrospectively considered discrete/analytic disjunctive elements/objects. (synthetic a priori)

Disjuncton: A relation between x and y such that x can be though of in some opposition to y.

Metatime: An absolute entity composed of linearity in a manifold of time frames and therefore beyond linearity itself.

 

Actual: Well this is the only term I have used ambiguously that I also will continue to use ambiguously, that which is actual may both denote that something is present at all and also a present memory in particular which relates to another present memory that is considered its potential, in the way they are combined as causal, even though they are not causal at present at all

Potential: The element of analysis which came by means of something else that were actual, that which were potential is the contingency itself of the one on the other.

 

Contingency: Another modality of Potentiality and Accident.  That which is contingent on something necessary.

Necessity: Another modality of Actuality and Essence. That which is necessary to which something else is contingent.

 

Modality: the way in which something is, the something which is in a certain way is essential to a certain perspective, often in a rhetorical point.

[Galyna]

@Reciprocality Thanks for nice feedback, however, I cannot understand some of your sentences, it is very hard.

You wrap the idea in a nice text, by I do not get your eloquence, for ex, you're saying: this is the reason we identify with who we were in our representation of the past in memory. 

It is super hard for the reader to understand what you mean; the word 'representation' is not necessary, confusing for the mind. Sorry if I am rude. It takes time to decode your message and to understand what you are trying to say.  

[Galyna]

2 hours ago, Reciprocality said:

Time is necessarily implicated in consciousness, as is space.

I would say that time and space is a mental construct, yes, quality of consciousness to reflect upon itself. 

2 hours ago, Reciprocality said:

I am not saying that we are in any way seeing how we were created

Who are you calling "we"?

2 hours ago, Reciprocality said:

I do not think there has been an absolute creation if you were asking that, for I consider nothingness to be impossible (this I actually know) and emptiness to be a mutual contingency to whatever fills it.

Isn't nothingness serves as a "ground" for everything?

[Reciprocality]

43 minutes ago, Galyna said:

@Reciprocality Thanks for nice feedback, however, I cannot understand some of your sentences, it is very hard.

You wrap the idea in a nice text, by I do not get your eloquence, for ex, you're saying: this is the reason we identify with who we were in our representation of the past in memory. 

It is super hard for the reader to understand what you mean; the word 'representation' is not necessary, confusing for the mind. Sorry if I am rude. It takes time to decode your message and to understand what you are trying to say.  

 

2 hours ago, Reciprocality said:

We think that it created us because we can impose our pure empty awareness into memories of our past, this is the reason we identify with who we were in our representation of the past in memory.

 

2 hours ago, Reciprocality said:

Synchronicity is a feeling we have when analyzing something which once created us.

 

On 29.4.2022 at 9:51 PM, Galyna said:

How can you explain this interesting phenomenon: as your understanding of reality evolving, let’s say as you get more “deeper into the awakening” process, the universe gives exactly that block of information that is needed at this particular time for “your” evolution?

My answer is that this feeling of the universe giving exactly the information required is because it actually does, because we are analyzing what is required for this evolution after the fact.

That is, we are necessarily given the precise information to further our particular evolution.

Then I reflect and say that we believe the past created us because we are trapped in a place in which the memories are subsistent essentials to who we became, I provided definitions above.

"this is the reason we identify with who we were in our representation of the past in memory. " The innermost emptiness of us, which one may realize trough meditation is dual to our memories of that we naturally represent as of the past, we would not identify with it if this emptiness did not relate to it the way it relates to our face, voice, constructs etc. To some people that are very awake this relation is more convergent. That it is a represented as of the past in memory is not necessary, that is right, but it relates to other parts of the conversation, and puts things in a coherent whole.

There may be something else that you are thinking of when you speak of synchronicity, that I can not decide for you.

[Galyna]

21 minutes ago, Reciprocality said:

My answer is that this feeling of the universe giving exactly the information required is because it actually does, because we are analyzing what is required for this evolution after the fact.

Absolutely agree, in a way, if we don’t have a capacity to decode the message, our perception, using selective feature, just bypasses it. So true! 

Edited April 30, 2022 by Galyna

[Reciprocality]

1 hour ago, Galyna said:

I would say that time and space is a mental construct, yes, quality of consciousness to reflect upon itself. 

Who are you calling "we"?

Isn't nothingness serves as a "ground" for everything?

@Galyna Well it is not, the means by which we represent them are constructs, but they are definitely not constructs themselves. I have argued this extensively in a post titled "most things are imagined".

There are things that may come and go when other things remains, and are also a combination of various things taken into one identity, only such things I call constructs.

Not only is both Time and Space there always when something else in particular, say a sound, touch or a thought is had but there latter things are contingent on the former.

Time and Space is of the mind, and ever present given the presence of something particular in mind, these are often called appearances.

 

We who are conscious are not seeing how we are created, necessarily, for then nothing could take in its output. I am sure this will not be accepted easily, but it is obvious. If we could see that we were created then we would be whatever created us, or whatever of which we are composed, if we are at all created and if we are at all composed.

 

 

Nothingness is a construct however, and this construct is definitely important for anything to make sense. It has a better term, "negation". It is not actually nothing, instead it is the imagination of a thing and the unimaginative of the same thing, which is what negation means. You may also argue retrospectively that nothing is the absence of an appearance or a magnitude in consciousness, but this is what I call emptiness and actually not at all nothing.

[Galyna]

16 minutes ago, Reciprocality said:

To some people that are very awake this relation is more convergent.

I see it as a thought but not reality. Memories are just thoughts. Actuality is always in the present.  Infinity gives birth to this falsehood every moment, individualized awareness grabs it, identifies with it, and based on prior memories creates illusion of I. 

[Reciprocality]

@Galyna I consider memories themselves to be lesser magnitudes of what once were higher magnitudes, that are typically initiated by emotion and which often follows emotions when brought about by thoughts. That they were once higher magnitudes of a posteriori experience is of course itself a synthetic thought, thus imagined, because sensible time by which it is rendered is fractured into a concept that is imposed on it.

Thoughts I consider to be either synthetic of everything which is not a thought, or analytic as pure concept, pure concept is almost always translatable to mathematics as we remember it or mathematics itself as we determine it. A non mathematical pure concept may be the synthesis itself in general, and not any synthesis in particular, or modality, or logic or categories in general.