Brief Insights regarding my experiences from SEP

[ll Ontology ll]

When people don't reveal much about themselves, especially if they're a potential romantic interest, people will often delude themselves about the value of that person, often for the better.

Sure, you can use this to your advantage however if your romantic interest is following my advice you won't want to.

Never really trust people that don't reveal much, think of every area of what contributes to a persons consciousness and analyse the level that a person is revealing in relation to their state. 

You don't want mystery, you want compatibility.

Allow the mystery aka your own personal delusion to come after the compatibility has truly been discerned.

This also gives you a fantastic opportunity in determining how well your romantic interest or even just friendship is capable of handling how much information you're throwing out about yourself. Observe how many questions they ask in response inclusive of the quality of those questions as they should be determining in response to you. How well do they make discernments about the things you say? In what ways can you improve your own discernment?

You don't want to be looking for mainstream information about relationships, aren't we already aware that mainstream views are what are leading to the downfall of civilisation and not just relationships (aka high divorce rates)?

Discern for yourself but only if you're at the very least going to learn how to do it well. 

Your life is too short to waste it on people that don't deserve your time, that live by say cognitive biases that you've already learned to grow beyond.

Especially on the Internet

 

 

Edited April 28, 2022 by ll Ontology ll

[ll Ontology ll]

1 hour ago, ll Ontology ll said:

When people don't reveal much about themselves, especially if they're a potential romantic interest, people will often delude themselves about the value of that person, often for the better.

Sure, you can use this to your advantage however if your romantic interest is following my advice you won't want to.

Never really trust people that don't reveal much, think of every area of what contributes to a persons consciousness and analyse the level that a person is revealing in relation to their state. 

You don't want mystery, you want compatibility.

Allow the mystery aka your own personal delusion to come after the compatibility has truly been discerned.

This also gives you a fantastic opportunity in determining how well your romantic interest or even just friendship is capable of handling how much information you're throwing out about yourself. Observe how many questions they ask in response inclusive of the quality of those questions as they should be determining in response to you. How well do they make discernments about the things you say? In what ways can you improve your own discernment?

You don't want to be looking for mainstream information about relationships, aren't we already aware that mainstream views are what are leading to the downfall of civilisation and not just relationships (aka high divorce rates)?

Discern for yourself but only if you're at the very least going to learn how to do it well. 

Your life is too short to waste it on people that don't deserve your time, that live by say cognitive biases that you've already learned to grow beyond.

Especially on the Internet

 

 

 

You must screen a person for how much of the real you they can handle.

The more a person is moved by mystery the more your relationship is going to be held together by fantasy and not reality, thus when you actually try to get close to each other the more likely any underlying incompatibility will destroy the fantasy  thereby sabotaging the relationship.

If reality sabotages the relationship in any way, its time to sabotage it! 

... With reality.

Common sense is not so common hey.

Wish I had of realise and followed this advice in the past.

To the extent our relationships are at all held together by fantasy and not the genuine love and intelligence you both bring to the relationship, newsflash, its not a relationship, its a corrupt prison and like any corrupt prison if you try to bring necessary reality to it and you succumb to any of the pressure put on your adherence to that reality, you're only going to add time to your psychological sentence, not reduce it or better, (not) breakout. 

 

Edited April 28, 2022 by ll Ontology ll

[ll Ontology ll]

32 minutes ago, ll Ontology ll said:

 

You must screen a person for how much of the real you they can handle.

The more a person is moved by mystery the more your relationship is going to be held together by fantasy and not reality, thus when you actually try to get close to each other the more likely any underlying incompatibility will destroy the fantasy  thereby sabotaging the relationship.

If reality sabotages the relationship in any way, its time to sabotage it! 

... With reality.

Common sense is not so common hey.

Wish I had of realise and followed this advice in the past.

To the extent our relationships are at all held together by fantasy and not the genuine love and intelligence you both bring to the relationship, newsflash, its not a relationship, its a corrupt prison and like any corrupt prison if you try to bring necessary reality to it and you succumb to any of the pressure put on your adherence to that reality, you're only going to add time to your psychological sentence, not reduce it or better, (not) breakout. 

 

 

I feel that, like a pain in the pit of my stomach quite literally, there's so many narcissistic people in the world that are trying to delude us all to believe their perceptions of reality without having any real backing to them, that upon questioning they just fall over, avoid or gaslight (most don't get away from me though if I have a vested interest, even if that interest is simply mild amusement). 

The whole world as it exists in our mind is in part a delusion in our minds until we see it better and we know this because when we do improve our perception of the world even if that perception is our world, that delusion decreases and our sight is more focused.

To me, we all have to make the great philosophers our friends not just the Rumi's and all the rest of the romantics of life.

The biggest delusion that the world relies upon is not the delusions that they sell us but our own self delusion because they know that this is the most reliable delusion of them all as it is the hardest to question.

More and more, we have to become better no matter at what level we are our ability to question our own self narratives, regardless as to how we feel, to me, so that very introspectively we can create the foundation for the growth we need to turn the worlds delusions upside down to create a world that is truly united with the reality of the universe relative to our abilities. As we do this, we not only improve the relationship the world has with itself, we improve all the relationships that are created in the world and therefore our relationship with ourselves as well as to and with others.

I said these were going to be brief, so I'll stop there.

 

[ll Ontology ll]

I wrote in SEP about my first girlfriend at age 16.

She was so beautiful but she lacked the ability to think about her experiences to a sophisticated level so I lost all interest because the moment she started talking about her impressions of general reality my error detector just went through the roof. If she had more humility in this area I wouldn't have lost attraction because she was very sweet, nurturing and intimate. I feel that's what reduces attraction in me a lot, when a woman does things where she is reducing her intimacy with existence. Intimacy with existence, even if its wrong or as I note above, delusional, is always attractive because there's always an innocence there that's attractive. Attractive doesn't equal relationship material though as I've learned. Where that innocence is aligned with reality though it would because she wouldn't be doing things in a relationship that corrupt the reality that makes it stick together, on the other hand, unless I just either supported her delusions or was supportive. Out of integrity, I could only do the latter... With integrity. 

I'll think more about other relationships later, though I'll only share elaborations based on what I share in SEP.

But yeah, physical attraction is so freaking overrated the more other things are valued in a relationship or if we're talking about a good relationship at all as there's just so much that goes into it, often I sometimes can't appreciate the physical beauty of a woman until she's activated other things in me. 

A woman overly concerned though with her looks, to the contrary, is a massive turn off for me, especially if she thinks "she's all that", it shows a lack of an intimate relationship with existence, or is something that reduces it and like I said about the lack of that reducing attraction and interest from me.

Edited April 28, 2022 by ll Ontology ll

[ll Ontology ll]

3 hours ago, ll Ontology ll said:

I wrote in SEP about my first girlfriend at age 16.

She was so beautiful but she lacked the ability to think about her experiences to a sophisticated level so I lost all interest because the moment she started talking about her impressions of general reality my error detector just went through the roof. If she had more humility in this area I wouldn't have lost attraction because she was very sweet, nurturing and intimate. I feel that's what reduces attraction in me a lot, when a woman does things where she is reducing her intimacy with existence. Intimacy with existence, even if its wrong or as I note above, delusional, is always attractive because there's always an innocence there that's attractive. Attractive doesn't equal relationship material though as I've learned. Where that innocence is aligned with reality though it would because she wouldn't be doing things in a relationship that corrupt the reality that makes it stick together, on the other hand, unless I just either supported her delusions or was supportive. Out of integrity, I could only do the latter... With integrity. 

I'll think more about other relationships later, though I'll only share elaborations based on what I share in SEP.

But yeah, physical attraction is so freaking overrated the more other things are valued in a relationship or if we're talking about a good relationship at all as there's just so much that goes into it, often I sometimes can't appreciate the physical beauty of a woman until she's activated other things in me. 

A woman overly concerned though with her looks, to the contrary, is a massive turn off for me, especially if she thinks "she's all that", it shows a lack of an intimate relationship with existence, or is something that reduces it and like I said about the lack of that reducing attraction and interest from me.

 

During this part of my life a small aspect involves taking my understanding of and relating to others to a whole new level as well (self understanding should always be something that someone is taking to the next level in my opinion) so its an expectation that this was shared by someone I was dating so we were able to feed each other insights and grow from that experience together moving forward.

 

Edited April 28, 2022 by ll Ontology ll

[ll Ontology ll]

When a mind has either a positive or negative feeling and its resourcing the imagination to understand that feeling, aka unchecked relationship "chemistry" or lack of chemistry, the mind will literally just fill in the blanks to create a pseudo understanding in relation to that feeling and or impression, sometimes regardless as to how little information there is, it just needs either enough or the appearance of enough.

It's literally that stupid and its what newsmedia have been relying on to sway public perception since King I'm gonna hang the next dude that looks at my queen since the dark ages.

These are your relationship con-artists relying on self delusion to take over as I was saying.

This "fill in the blank" mechanism of the brain where it uses its filters of past experiences to do this is like a revolving door of illusion. If questioning isn't like a strong value shared by two people in a relationship, what is the relationship built on?

Literally study magic to enhance your understanding here if you wanted a core perception of both the relationship con-artist and the analogous mechanisms as it relates to relationships and the different areas within (i.e. another's perception of you, themselves and the relationship from different points of view aka time - as it relates to both the future and the past).

[ll Ontology ll]

^ I'll make them more like this from now on. I'll create a style just as I was replicating Laozi with one comment in my other journal and I'll repeat that algorithm in terms of how I describe things here so there's a reliable pattern in my descriptions. Give me some time so I can get the feel for things then a style shall emerge! Transparency.

[ll Ontology ll]

Haha righto. 

I do get the message.

A part of my consciousness is potentially abducted and planning in a way that I'm in sync with you, apologies I will get to the bottom of this to ensure "all matter of Michael that has runabout elsewhere" is scooped up, plugged into the universal matter to energy recycling bin in some distant blackhole and plugged back into regular consciousness so I can take control of that scoundrel more closely. 

[ll Ontology ll]

^ Well that was over quick. Lovin' growth. No need to talk about.

Relationship pointer, with all forms of relationships including people you've never met.

Always empathise with those experiencing unique inner experiences and responses to reality (i.e. unique neurological architecture) otherwise you're the one without empathy you're the one with the consciousness deficit, and I didn't say don't have boundaries, sure Fort Knox it with some humour, we have M.A.S.H on Mr. Olympia during a heist on the premiere viewing of a childhood favourite, The Score (Edward Norton I would turn gay for you if my biology was capable of it but it is not, though a clone of me could I know because I met him last night begging for money because he's trying to get away from me due to mistreatment, I taught him nothing so he could survive so he's bound to beg to come back).

Empathy is a creative-cognitive construct, it is not mere scientific objectification, while at the same time it is the cure to most if not all forms of all obstacles of the mind in its extension.

Realism and Surrealism balanced with unitive empathy,

lxlichael

[ll Ontology ll]

3 minutes ago, Akashic said:

Don't gaslight me. This whole post reads like word salad, like are you sure you're thinking straight

All good@Akashic I've shared the conversation you started with me with a mod they'll get back to you when they can.

All the best.

[ll Ontology ll]

 

 

 

To everyone else I'll be taking my word salads to a professional cooking photographer then showcasting my ideations to the major restaurants in my local city, so if you have any creative pointers just let me know and I'll give them intelligent consideration. 

 

 

 

[ll Ontology ll]

“Selling wit for $5 a Twitter share, buy majority share and you get first class Elon treatment. Now give me yo ‘poison pill’ money! I can’t have Dorcy as my only supporter in a leadership position.” Zelenskyy be like, “Here sit down, start answering calls you got this I can’t handle the public anymore you’re more immune than me, plus you have a better philosophical sense of humour.” Putin be like, “Fuuuuuuuuck bro. Can’t even double agent this guy.” Biden be like, “The teleprompter is playing up so I’m having a cigar otherwise I’ll be remembered as worse than Bush, some people think… this that already may case be. Now where’s my wife Kathleen? Wait no that’s my sons former wife, was it her that was on drugs or Hunter? My poor son I can’t believe he had to deal with her drug problem. After everything he did for her! I can’t believe she tried to convince everyone that Obama was from South Africa she’s disgraced our entire legacy! I will never have her as my First Lady as president again! Yes I’m running once more!”, Australian Priminister who cannot be know at the time of this comment because there’s so much backstabbing in Australian politics be like, “We’re willing to negotiate (with whether Biden runs again or not) regardless no matter what!”, they have a lot of experience playing politics like this with Australian aboriginals selling at 0.1 cents a Lincoln anti-slavery share. Twitter be like, “Elon hasn’t  increased the maximum word limit yet so this comment cannot go through!”. My subsequent Twitter likes remain at zero because just like Bin-Ladin taught me, I do not negotiate with terrorists!

 

 

 

In a nutshell, if you’re going to comment on my journals I expect no less than Cheetos of wit, Coca Cola of humour and the infinite intelligence of nahasapeemapetilon’s more advanced self.

“Thank you come again!” 

How is this even possible? Who cares just enjoy and add to the discussion with a critical, open and creative mind.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited April 29, 2022 by ll Ontology ll

[ll Ontology ll]

And it’s really just the Labour Party by the way haha not the liberal party concerning Australian politics.

Hitting “Do not disturb button” on this journal now so I can Mother Theresa this shit, you should love me more because I do this without having exclusive access to those in need like she did.

[ll Ontology ll]

 

 

DO NOT DISTURB

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[ll Ontology ll]

Relationship sentiment - relating to this site:

Look for relationships with people where they're able to resolve cognitive dissonance well and hold two or more contrasting perspectives and themes in their mind.

That's literally the only problem I've had communicating with folk on this forum, if I've ever had an issue, mostly everyone has been pretty good. 

When someone isn't able to hold competing positions, feelings and general states of consciousness, their psychology is more than likely going to split and the effects of that are going to be social disrepair more often than social unity.

It's the origins to most human conflicts as most people simply aren't enabled with the kind of processing power that allows them to avoid the corresponding backbiting behaviour, backstabbing as well as this unable to "read between the lines", hold multiple timelines and perspectives on a persons motivations, so on and so fourth is what leads to further corresponding difficulties. 

If you have any personal difficulties here, yeah meditation, introspection, all that good stuff.

Edited April 29, 2022 by ll Ontology ll

[ll Ontology ll]

26 minutes ago, ll Ontology ll said:

Relationship sentiment - relating to this site:

Look for relationships with people where they're able to resolve cognitive dissonance well and hold two or more contrasting perspectives and themes in their mind.

That's literally the only problem I've had communicating with folk on this forum, if I've ever had an issue, mostly everyone has been pretty good. 

When someone isn't able to hold competing positions, feelings and general states of consciousness, their psychology is more than likely going to split and the effects of that are going to be social disrepair more often than social unity.

It's the origins to most human conflicts as most people simply aren't enabled with the kind of processing power that allows them to avoid the corresponding backbiting behaviour, backstabbing as well as this unable to "read between the lines", hold multiple timelines and perspectives on a persons motivations, so on and so fourth is what leads to further corresponding difficulties. 

If you have any personal difficulties here, yeah meditation, introspection, all that good stuff.

Simply sharing my SEP responses here from now on, just want to devote myself to the health of the answers rather than jumping out of a black hole using humour as my jet fuel from my jet pack. That’s where my hearts telling me to go so I gotta listen to it. Ha.

[ll Ontology ll]

5 minutes ago, ll Ontology ll said:

Simply sharing my SEP responses here from now on, just want to devote myself to the health of the answers rather than jumping out of a black hole using humour as my jet fuel from my jet pack. That’s where my hearts telling me to go so I gotta listen to it. Ha.

I’ll add synthesised points to the links as well that cover say a more universal perspective. Make sharing worthwhile otherwise no point really. I don’t like this divergence I’ve done much so far.

Edited April 29, 2022 by ll Ontology ll

[ll Ontology ll]

Todays responses:

Part 1 to corresponding link:

Our minds are the nexus for the railroad tracks that our hearts follow in determining our reactions to our social environments. 

How can we use simulation, empathy and other higher order mental faculties to bring about more mature development to our perspective of others and through this our subsequent automatic associations, that without improving our sophistication, we remain tied to the shackles they bear?

 

Edited April 29, 2022 by ll Ontology ll

[ll Ontology ll]

Todays responses:

Part 2 to corresponding link:

As we all know, as we have so far lived in this human body and experienced it’s upper and lower limits in many respects, attachment is no different in what has been reflected in our sight. We have experienced the highest highs of attachment and it’s lowest lows. Attachment can have such a powerful influence on how we think of not only our personal social lives but how we frame and think of all of life, as such, the choices that govern the frames, lenses and approaches we have with respect to attachment dramatically impact our self perception, our perception of the world around us and through this it becomes a fundamental reflection of our chosen purpose in this life and the purposes that we fundamentally inevitably take on with or without our active choices. In saying as much, what have you decided on attachment at a subconscious level to date? What has led to this decision? How would you like to improve your stance on the topic? How are you personally biased and what would bring you closer to your own truer personal truth?

 

Edited April 29, 2022 by ll Ontology ll

[ll Ontology ll]

State of Responsibility vs Environmental Acclimation 

I realise now that I have to take this a little more seriously, I’ve been up and down on the serious tone as some may tell.

Energetically I’ve been in the motions of clearing out mild to moderate cynicism regarding the forum that I’ve only really just become conscious of so I suppose that’s where I can trace some of my humour to keep me along the path here.

As to what general energy I have consolidated for my daily activities here (1-3 responses per day though it’s not the most active part of the forum) after it’s all cleared I’m unsure though regardless there’s certainly a level of reservedness that is revealing itself outside that forum area across all of my journal spaces now. 

No doubt this has to do with trusting the forum again rather than feeling like I’m in the back-foot, I originally created a stir for my own investigative purposes so naturally on both sides there’s some hesitancy there still though inwardly I feel like a new equilibrium is beginning to emerge that was far healthier than any past relationship I had with this forum so this is what I am leaning towards with wisdom more than anything else. It’ll be good when I’m able to once again feel like there’s the full openness to accept the forum in its terms and no longer have to concern myself with any form of defence where I can just focus on the kind of service I would like to bring as natural part of my growth.

My presence and participation at the moment feels like a contradiction that is slowly finding its balance which I’m looking forward to seeing the other side of including the other side of the picture that awaits post a full development of my contributory experiences at SEP.

Love and Responsibility,

lxlichael

PS - Where to insert humour and where not to in light of the nature of this journal is a work in progress, at the moment now it’s newly serious and it’ll probably stay that way until I learn how to create a complementary balance there.