Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Meditationdude

% theory vs. practice

6 posts in this topic

In all honesty how much thinking and theorizing do you do vs. actual practice?(observing direct experience, being present, meditation, contemplation, etc..)

I started out around 90% theory and 10 practice but after 5 years in the game it slowly flipped. 
 

I would consider being on this forum theory, obviously. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

99,99999% theory. The rest is also theory with some practice mixed in. Psychedelic awakening showed me how hopelessly unconscious I really am. I'm completely honest. Today I was probably less conscious than in 5 minutes of my last LSD experience. Here some seconds, there some seconds. Staying focused and aware for more than 15 seconds happens like once a day. 

Edited by Vynce

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Vynce well yeah, but an awakening level of consciousness is not what I’m referring to as practice. I think you know what practice is 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Meditationdude said:

well yeah, but an awakening level of consciousness is not what I’m referring to as practice.

I don't want to get too technical but there is no "practice for consciousness". Either you are conscious right now or not. It's completely irrelevant if you sit in a "practice room" or have "practice timer" running. None of this can help you with being aware of what is. Even in the most non-practicable environment you can be conscious of what is. 

Spirituality is endlessly paradoxical if thinking is involved :D So I stop my texting (thinking) here to be more conscious. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If I am considering theory these days, it is altering my state, usually quite significantly. It wasn’t always this way. 
 

I combine theory with practice. A thought is a portal into a certain state if you have the experience with practice to make proper use of it. 
 

There’s not really any radically new theory I come across these days. At most, it’s usually just a bit of a different spin on something I’ve already gone over quite a bit. States are what is new. They are eternally new, with some varying more than others. I value the states themselves far above the theory nowadays. The theory is like a hammer to help drive in a nail. 


What did the stage orange scientist call the stage blue fundamentalist for claiming YHWH intentionally caused Noah’s great flood?

Delugional. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0