Leo's Blog Post

[Thorsten Fuzzi]

Hello Leo!

I've just watched the video you posted on your blog about the video takedown and your new awakening.

I'm not to trying to get into an argument here, just striving for clarification. Are you claiming to be the most conscious entity in the sense that you're fully God, or in the sense that you are the most awake human incarnation of God, as if other “individual” (ancient Yogis, Shamans, whatever) have never reached such levels?

Or is this distinction meaningless too?

I'd appreciate a clear statement on that a lot. Love ya!

[Leo Gura]

I'm claiming something more radical than that. I am claiming that you are the only awake thing in existence.

[Carl-Richard]

[RendHeaven]

3 hours ago, Thorsten Fuzzi said:

Are you claiming to be the most conscious entity

You're assuming separation

[Thorsten Fuzzi]

21 hours ago, Leo Gura said:

I'm claiming something more radical than that. I am claiming that you are the only awake thing in existence.

But that's not new, isn't it? If we are one entity, who or what else could ever be conscious?

Having clarified that, I assume YOU leave room for the possibility of YOU having realized yourself to the same degree through other human (or nonhuman) incarnations, right?

Of course, I won't ever believe or follow you blindly, but I'm open to the possibility that you're the most conscious personification of YOU around. Why not? Reality is weird enough for that to be true... haha

Still, all I have is my intuition and a longing for God that overpowers any other desire. I just can't not know. It's not a life worth living, if I don't.

Let's see where this journey takes us! Thank you for everything!

Edited April 4, 2022 by Thorsten Fuzzi

[The0Self]

1 hour ago, Leo Gura said:

I'm claiming something more radical than that. I am claiming that you are the only awake thing in existence.

At the sort of loosey-goosey dualistic (movement) level of “my” (the one talking to someone else is completely fictional and I’m fully conscious of that) dream creation, it’s as if a vampire is amused at the prospect of there being other vampires — surely this character picked that up from Jed McKenna in this vast limitless infinite imagination. I am the only thing that exists, and you are me and I am you. Whatever reads this is not awake or even being spoken to, as they are completely manufactured individuals living in apparent separation from one another for my/your amusement (but it isn’t really mine/yours because there is no you or me at the level this will certainly be read at), as there is only one awake being and that is what I am.

Yeah, amongst other things that are not in any way communicable... it’s just the utter collapse of the illusion of other being anything but an elaborate play. At the core there is just limitless, impenetrable-if-desired, infinite imagination.

Edited April 3, 2022 by The0Self

[Thorsten Fuzzi]

24 minutes ago, RendHeaven said:

You're assuming separation

I don't. I quoted the expression he used in the video.

[Matthew85]

6 hours ago, Leo Gura said:

I'm claiming something more radical than that. I am claiming that you are the only awake thing in existence.

@Leo Gura Will you please expand on the paradoxical nature of this truth?

[Yarco]

6 hours ago, Thorsten Fuzzi said:

But that's not new, isn't it? If we are one entity, who or what else could ever be conscious?

Having clarified that, I assume you leave room for the possibility of you having realized yourself to the same degree through other human (or nonhuman) incarnations, right?

Of course, I won't ever believe or follow you blindly, but I'm open to the possibility that you're the most conscious person around. Why not? Reality is weird enough for that to be true... haha

Still, all I have is my intuition and a longing for God that overpowers any other desire. I just can't not know. It's not a life worth living, if I don't.

Let's see where this journey takes us! Thank you for everything!

There is no we, there is no us. There is only you. 

There is no Leo to believe or follow. Leo can't be the most conscious person. He can't be conscious at all. Only you are conscious.

6 hours ago, Thorsten Fuzzi said:

 If we are one entity, who or what else could ever be conscious?

No one else.

When you dream at night, how many other entities that you see in your dream will ever wake up? Only you.

19 minutes ago, Matthew85 said:

Will you please expand on the paradoxical nature of this truth?

What do you find paradoxical about his statement? What is preventing you from being the only awake thing in existence, or what proof do you have otherwise?

Edited April 3, 2022 by Yarco

[machiavelli]

14 hours ago, Leo Gura said:

I'm claiming something more radical than that. I am claiming that you are the only awake thing in existence.

@Leo Gura Leo, can you please clarify whether you mean only person can awaken is me because other people are non-conscious just like what happens in night time dream?

Hence, absolute solipsism. Because others are figment of my own mind. And are unconscious. 

[Carl-Richard]

7 minutes ago, machiavelli said:

@Leo Gura Leo, can you please clarify whether you mean only person can awaken is me because other people are non-conscious just like what happens in night time dream?

Hence, absolute solipsism. Because others are figment of my own mind. And are unconscious. 

Egos are not conscious. Consciousness is conscious.

[machiavelli]

@Carl-Richard that is not my question.

[Carl-Richard]

5 minutes ago, machiavelli said:

@Carl-Richard that is not my question.

Yes it is. Other people and you as a person = egos. Consciousness is transpersonal.

[Thorsten Fuzzi]

14 hours ago, Yarco said:

There is no we, there is no us. There is only you. 

There is no Leo to believe or follow. Leo can't be the most conscious person. He can't be conscious at all. Only you are conscious.

That's the point I made, my friend. Still, there is the appearance. My original question referred to exactly that relation.

Further, I'd encourage you not to argue using mental nondual talking points. This is not about philosophy. Be sincere with direct experience. It's all we have.

Edited April 4, 2022 by Thorsten Fuzzi

[RendHeaven]

On 4/4/2022 at 10:07 AM, Thorsten Fuzzi said:

Still, there is the appearance.

When you personally realize "solipsism," no, there is not.