I asked Bashar directly about solipsism - here is what he said

[Fernanda]

You can be directly conscious of others having experiences that once you could not be conscious of, for many reasons. Thus, you are acessing your own imagination and breaking the separation. The free will of others is imagine by you and is such a beautiful distinction. It's like humans creating an artificially inteligent machine or a movie antagonist that takes over the protagonist. It's infinite and astonishing.

Since consciousness is ONE, I see no way Leo could be wrong. He was brave enough to make himself assertive, speaking from an absolute sense and I hope he continues this way. Personally, it changed my life and I am feeling more compassionate, not less. Maybe many people aren't ready for a straight forward teaching, because they are still looking for something outside themselves, maybe for some sort of "salvation". 

[Bufo Alvarius]

@Inliytened1  @Leo Gura In other videos, Bashar explains a bit more the way reality works. 

From the Q&A form the video "Archetypes of God". Questioner asking about his deceased mother.

Questioner: "Since we're continuously creating our experience of others out of different distinct parallel reality versions of them, who was I in relatioship with and which version of her will I be connected with in spirit?"

Bashar: "A different version, a greater Self. More of who she actually is, as a reflection of the infinite. Whatever it is you need, is what you will connect to in her."

Questioner: "I'm wondering if she is real in and of herself?"

Bashar: "Yes, of course she is. That doesn't mean, you are not creating your version of her."

Questioner: "So if she has her own reality, how can it be that there are some where she doesn't do this, and some where she does do this?"

Bashar: "Because you are talking about a much higher version of the being, which can experience many different things simoultaneously. 
Right now, you're focused on what you understand as the spirit individual representing your mother. That's the level we're addressing now. But on a much greater level, remembering that you are all All That Is,  you can experience everything and anything simultaneously. Just depends on what level of the consciousness you're referring to, whe you talk about forming a relationship with it."

Questioner: "If she does have her own experience, she is not just a character on my screen?"

Bashar: No, you didn't make her up. The idea is that everyone is a fundemal existing being, but you still create your version as an interface to relate to. It's like saying, you understand when you have a telephone conversation with a friend, you're not actually hearing their real voice. You're hearing a recreation electronically, that sounds like them, but they have their own voice. It's just converted into electronic signals, that are reconstituted into audio signals at your end. So, it's like that. You're creating your version that you can relate to, even though she has her own reality, just as she creates her version of you, even though you have your own reality. Just like the telephone recreates the voice, that isn't the original voice, but it's representative of something that is real."

Questioner: "So my whole life, I've been recreating her out of many possible variants, to create the experience I needed of her?"

Bashar: "Yes, exactly. As she has done with you."

 

 

[Forza21]

56 minutes ago, Bufo Alvarius said:

@Inliytened1  @Leo Gura In other videos, Bashar explains a bit more the way reality works. 

From the Q&A form the video "Archetypes of God". Questioner asking about his deceased mother.

Questioner: "Since we're continuously creating our experience of others out of different distinct parallel reality versions of them, who was I in relatioship with and which version of her will I be connected with in spirit?"

Bashar: "A different version, a greater Self. More of who she actually is, as a reflection of the infinite. Whatever it is you need, is what you will connect to in her."

Questioner: "I'm wondering if she is real in and of herself?"

Bashar: "Yes, of course she is. That doesn't mean, you are not creating your version of her."

Questioner: "So if she has her own reality, how can it be that there are some where she doesn't do this, and some where she does do this?"

Bashar: "Because you are talking about a much higher version of the being, which can experience many different things simoultaneously. 
Right now, you're focused on what you understand as the spirit individual representing your mother. That's the level we're addressing now. But on a much greater level, remembering that you are all All That Is,  you can experience everything and anything simultaneously. Just depends on what level of the consciousness you're referring to, whe you talk about forming a relationship with it."

Questioner: "If she does have her own experience, she is not just a character on my screen?"

Bashar: No, you didn't make her up. The idea is that everyone is a fundemal existing being, but you still create your version as an interface to relate to. It's like saying, you understand when you have a telephone conversation with a friend, you're not actually hearing their real voice. You're hearing a recreation electronically, that sounds like them, but they have their own voice. It's just converted into electronic signals, that are reconstituted into audio signals at your end. So, it's like that. You're creating your version that you can relate to, even though she has her own reality, just as she creates her version of you, even though you have your own reality. Just like the telephone recreates the voice, that isn't the original voice, but it's representative of something that is real."

Questioner: "So my whole life, I've been recreating her out of many possible variants, to create the experience I needed of her?"

Bashar: "Yes, exactly. As she has done with you."

 

 

Leo: "Your mom is imaginary. You dreamt her up. It's all YOU! Wake up!!! You are GOD!"

 

Which of course may be useful to some, because it's so direct.

But based on what i see on the forum, it's confusing for most people here. So if I were Leo, and if i cared a single fuck about people on my forum, i'd give a further/different explanation, cause the current one, doesn't seem to work 

 

[Leo Gura]

If you want to awaken stop asking your imaginary friends if they are real, and then believing them.

This is the height of stupidity.

You invented Bashar.

[Inliytened1]

6 hours ago, Bufo Alvarius said:

@Inliytened1  @Leo Gura In other videos, Bashar explains a bit more the way reality works. 

From the Q&A form the video "Archetypes of God". Questioner asking about his deceased mother.

Questioner: "Since we're continuously creating our experience of others out of different distinct parallel reality versions of them, who was I in relatioship with and which version of her will I be connected with in spirit?"

Bashar: "A different version, a greater Self. More of who she actually is, as a reflection of the infinite. Whatever it is you need, is what you will connect to in her."

Questioner: "I'm wondering if she is real in and of herself?"

Bashar: "Yes, of course she is. That doesn't mean, you are not creating your version of her."

Questioner: "So if she has her own reality, how can it be that there are some where she doesn't do this, and some where she does do this?"

Bashar: "Because you are talking about a much higher version of the being, which can experience many different things simoultaneously. 
Right now, you're focused on what you understand as the spirit individual representing your mother. That's the level we're addressing now. But on a much greater level, remembering that you are all All That Is,  you can experience everything and anything simultaneously. Just depends on what level of the consciousness you're referring to, whe you talk about forming a relationship with it."

Questioner: "If she does have her own experience, she is not just a character on my screen?"

Bashar: No, you didn't make her up. The idea is that everyone is a fundemal existing being, but you still create your version as an interface to relate to. It's like saying, you understand when you have a telephone conversation with a friend, you're not actually hearing their real voice. You're hearing a recreation electronically, that sounds like them, but they have their own voice. It's just converted into electronic signals, that are reconstituted into audio signals at your end. So, it's like that. You're creating your version that you can relate to, even though she has her own reality, just as she creates her version of you, even though you have your own reality. Just like the telephone recreates the voice, that isn't the original voice, but it's representative of something that is real."

Questioner: "So my whole life, I've been recreating her out of many possible variants, to create the experience I needed of her?"

Bashar: "Yes, exactly. As she has done with you."

 

 

He seems to indicate here thar there is an objective world.  There isn't. 

[Mafortu]

I really dont believe this man channels an alien entity, but I do respect how eloquent and quick he is with his answers 

[Leo Gura]

Bashar has some great overall advice, lots of useful wisdom.

It just isn't God-Realization.

[Matthew85]

@Bufo Alvarius Thank you for sharing this!

If you attend another event ask Bashar, if I expanded my awareness to the level of all that is, would I perceive or feel that I am the only being that exists?

Who else would love to see an interview with Leo and Bashar? 

 

[Vibroverse]

5 hours ago, Matthew85 said:

@Bufo Alvarius Thank you for sharing this!

If you attend another event ask Bashar, if I expanded my awareness to the level of all that is, would I perceive or feel that I am the only being that exists?

Who else would love to see an interview with Leo and Bashar? 

 

I'd love to see an interview with these imaginary friends of mine. 

[Waken]

On 2/27/2022 at 0:10 AM, Inliytened1 said:

This is going to rock Bashar fans everywhere  but he was not awake if he felt there were other beings having their own experiences.  Those are imaginary and held within your mind. 

Oh come on, everybody here does this.. using an absolute POV to overpower or invalidate other perspectives, and I bet confusing a lot of people. Especially people on this solipsism topic. I would suggest Bashar said that from the absolute POV there are no others, but from an individuated experiential POV there are, and therefore I would say Bashars take is not one of solipsism as it seems to be presented on this forum here

[OBEler]

Yeah I See it also. Bashar speaks from relative perspective, Leo from absolute. Leo why Do you assume that they dont know about the absolute perspektive where everything is one and alone. They talk to peoples level

[Yeah Yeah]

@Matthew85 That'd be a mind-blowing collab if we did get such an interview session

[A Fellow Lighter]

On 26/02/2022 at 11:09 PM, Bufo Alvarius said:

Bashar: "It depends on the level that you are looking from. In other words, you can have an experience of seperation, which is what you have in physical reality. That doesn't mean you actually are literally seperated. 

Again, the paradox is that you are using your connection to create an experience of seperation. You couldn't have an experience of individual seperation, if you actually weren't connected to All That Is. 

So in that ultimate sense, from that perspective, no there is no outside. But from the experience of individuation, from the experience of creating the illusion of seperation, then yes, you can have an outside and there are many beings you may be unaware of, that are having their own experiences. 

Your experiential reality only contains your versions of other beings. They exist in their own right, in a sense outside of you. And there may be millions of them, that you do not experience, because there is no reason for you to create a version of those beings in your reality experience. 
At the same time, this is all happening within the All That Is, that has no outside. But you have to understand that you cannot necessarily mix your language that way, you can't mix your definitions that way in a coherent sense, you have to understand what level that you're talking from. 

When you say "Is there really an outside, if everything is one, there shouldn't be an outside?", well yes, on that level that's true.  But you're talking from the experience of having created the illusion of seperation, which creates the illusion of an outside and many beings, that you might not be aware of outside of yourself. 

This is not solipsism. Consciousness, as far as it is experiential reality, has no levels and at no point does it have an outside.

The problem is that people haven't contemplated consciousness enough to realise that it can only work solipsistically. Consciousness must be solipsistic for there to be an experience of reality. If it weren't solipsistic, then the experience wouldn't/couldn't be realistic, thus defeating the whole point of consciousness.

This is not easy to explain, better it be realised through awakening. But imagine trying to run a simulation with more than one code — it would be nothing sensical and nothing less than a mess. There has to be a single code in order for the simulation to yield informative and authentic results. I'm not simply talking about infinity here but the sole experience of reality. And the code, in this analogy, is truth itself.

But to drive the point home, even when you're asleep and dreaming — there is still nothing outside of your consciousness, not even the "sleeping body". When asleep, the dream world is the only world that exists. That's how focused or super tuned consciousness really is. It's consciousness — it's experiential reality. Consciousness will literally end the dream before it can allow some sort of split in the experience of reality, and that's including the so called "waking" dream which we call reality. 

Experience of reality must be singular, no matter the form it takes.