Question about COVID 19

[Arcangelo]

Do guys know if they are developing a one time only, old school vaccine?

Like an old technology vaccine. Not an MRNA vaccine.

 

[Arcangelo]

Yes they are look:

Cool.

This will give a lot of people a lot of peace of mind.

[Danioover9000]

   I'm glad they have developed a more natural vaccine, although it's too late for me at this point.

[Carl-Richard]

mRNA vaccine technology has been under serious development for over 10 years since the founding of Moderna Inc. in 2010 (ModeRNA). Combine this with the fact that we've completed multiple clinical trials for several mRNA vaccines, it's clear that any skepticism about side effects is now confined to the domain of the potential and the long-term (e.g. "what if something happens during the length of a lifetime?"). With this in mind, let's test the consistency of people's long-term threat sensitivity:

Are you worried about the potential long-term effects of Wi-Fi on your brain and body to the point where you're not using it? Are you worried about EMF from your mobile phone so that you're not wearing it in your pocket or having it close to your head? Are you worried about GMOs to the point where you're not buying it? None of these things have been tested long-term, yet you most likely don't care. Let's also not forget about Neuralink.

At the risk of being reductive, I'll still mention that the psychology behind vaccine skepticism is very much tied to the fear of poisons, which is a deeply ingrained survival drive. The idea of a foreign substance being intentionally and certainly introduced to your body is threatening on a very primal level. Maybe even more importantly, you have the tendency to prefer the analytic lens (individual bodies, individual substances, certainty) over the systemic lens (collective forces, degrees of influence, probability).

On the other hand, invisible forces like viruses that spread collectively and probabilistically from person to person, or undetectable electromagnetic frequencies, are conceptually much more abstract and vague to attend to. They don't have the same primal punch as actually being injected with something that you at some level interpret as a physical poison. Obviously that isn't to say that vaccine skeptics are not able to think abstractly, but it's rather that the primal fears often precede, co-opt and drive higher thinking. There is no rationality without emotions, and the mind rationalizes its own survival. Then add some collective hysteria and skepticism about institutions on top, and you have COVID-19 denialism.

[Johnny Galt]

@Carl-Richard I'm curious if you can assist me with a few questions I have in regards to the pfizer study, which gave the number 95%. 

see at, 3:15

 

One of my questions, lies with the placebo group. There were 162 out of 21,830 who were classified as "infected". I'm curious, out of the 162 how many were serious infections? how many died?

I'm also curious about the details around the 8 who were "infected" from the vaccine group. 

I do recal looking for these details in the study and yet I had troubles finding them, maybe you can help me out with that?

Edited December 27, 2021 by Johnny Galt

[Blackhawk]

It's so stupid to be afraid of mRNA vaccines. Stop being so paranoid.

Read this: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/different-vaccines/mrna.html

[Johnny Galt]

@Blackhawk Thank you for the share. You might want to shoot the cdc link to this pharmacist

 

[Blackhawk]

2 hours ago, Johnny Galt said:

@Blackhawk Thank you for the share. You might want to shoot the cdc link to this pharmacist

 

He's a idiot.