God is Selfish

[WokeBloke]

3 minutes ago, Nahm said:

Nice! 

Meditation. 

So I refers to that which creates thoughts. Thoughtless awareness or presence.

[Nahm]

@WokeBloke

No. That’s just ‘the emperor’s new clothes’, a new / another belief. 

[WokeBloke]

3 minutes ago, Nahm said:

@WokeBloke

No. That’s just ‘the emperor’s new clothes’, a new / another belief. 

If I is defined as that which creates thoughts then I can say I created this thought.

[The0Self]

1 minute ago, WokeBloke said:

If I is defined as that which creates thoughts then I can say I created this thought.

Exactly. “I” has no fixed definable reality.

[Nahm]

@WokeBloke

I is a thought. 

[WokeBloke]

Just now, The0Self said:

Exactly. “I” has no fixed definable reality.

What defines I?

[WokeBloke]

1 minute ago, Nahm said:

@WokeBloke

I is a thought. 

Created by I (that which creates thoughts)

I created the I thought. The I thought did not create the I thought.

[Nahm]

@WokeBloke

Circular logic. 

[WokeBloke]

4 minutes ago, Nahm said:

@WokeBloke

Circular logic. 

Created by I (defined as that which creates logic).

[Nahm]

@WokeBloke

More of the same there. 

Meditation. 

[WokeBloke]

18 minutes ago, Nahm said:

@WokeBloke

More of the same there. 

Meditation. 

So you believe there is no creator?

[WokeBloke]

20 minutes ago, Nahm said:

@WokeBloke

More of the same there. 

Meditation. 

Is there 0, 1, or 2 creators of this sentence?

[Nahm]

@WokeBloke

Hope it’s not taken in any personal way, but I don’t want to contribute to existential rumination. For the answer to that and anything else existential; meditation. 

[WokeBloke]

8 minutes ago, Nahm said:

@WokeBloke

Hope it’s not taken in any personal way, but I don’t want to contribute to existential rumination. For the answer to that and anything else existential; meditation. 

the answer is 1 creator.

[The0Self]

4 minutes ago, WokeBloke said:

the answer is 1 creator.

There is simply not two -- no separation.

But that's not a claim, it's just what appears to be -- every claim is married to doubt.

[WokeBloke]

1 minute ago, The0Self said:

There is simply not two -- no separation.

But that's not a claim, it's just what appears to be -- every claim is married to doubt.

so are you agreeing?

[The0Self]

Just now, WokeBloke said:

so are you agreeing?

You claimed "1." I negated with "not two."

[WokeBloke]

5 minutes ago, The0Self said:

You claimed "1." I negated with "not two."

not two has nothing to do with 1. if you want to negate 1 then say not 1.

Edited December 3, 2021 by WokeBloke

[The0Self]

9 minutes ago, WokeBloke said:

not two has nothing to do with 1

exactly

[WokeBloke]

5 minutes ago, The0Self said:

exactly

so I'm claiming just one creates this. And therefore also not 2.