fantasy is actually real

[Guardian]

as most ones know by following actualized.org more or less, reality is limitless.

parallel to one's timeline and space there are infinite other ones without any gap in between. 

think of the real number line. pick a number a and b. between those 2 numbers there are infinitely many other numbers. find the middle of these numbers c = (a+b)/2.

any number from c that is closer to a is its own timeline more representative of the reality that a stands for. similar for b.

a and b are each representatives of a timeline and just like there are infinitely many numbers inbetween 2 numbers, there are infinitely many on the whole numberline and so it is with timelines and ''realities'' so to speak.

 

the spread between a timeline that one calls 'physical reality of unbreakable laws' and something one calls fantasy just seems for one's mind wide.

however, when one fantasizes, one actually experiences that reality just on a more or less 'weaker' perception than the one, one is unconsciosly grounded in as physical reality.

so don't discourage or scorn about wandering one's mind/daydreaming/loving fiction etc.

and try not to draw solid distinction and buy into explanation as to why one is non-sense and the other is truth.

these are all valid realities in their own right, one's experience of them just may be different and experience can be shifted.

Edited October 26, 2021 by Guardian

[Guardian]

now here is a mammoth task for the interested.

assume we have a number line that is representative of a physical reality with its own natural laws where each point on that number line stands for a time line within that physical composition.

what would be if we add another number line that stand for another physical composition with its own natural laws more or less different from the first one?

and then three and four and so on... ?

remember each point is a whole time line within that composition.

there are infinitely many points and between two points there are infinitely many points as well.

Edited October 26, 2021 by Guardian

[Carl-Richard]

Every distinction can be deconstucted.

 

[Guardian]

1 hour ago, Carl-Richard said:

Every distinction can be deconstucted.

 

this is a good basis of any theory that works with a number of infinite or arbitrarily finite distinctions.

however, it isn't clear as to why distinction can be removed, moved or redefined or why there are not any in essence hint: combine step 1 and 3

Edited October 26, 2021 by Guardian

[Carl-Richard]

2 hours ago, Guardian said:

this is a good basis of any theory that works with a number of infinite or arbitrarily finite distinctions.

however, it isn't clear as to why distinction can be removed, moved or redefined or why there are not any in essence hint: combine step 1 and 3

It's not a complete representation of the phenomena.  It's a visualization for the means of deconstructing falsehood and point to truth. Truth can never be represented. It can only be presented.