Replacing everyone with stage green people

[Stovo]

Just as a thought experiment, let's imagine that anyone at stage orange or below disappeared, so we're just left with green or above. 

Would the world stay at green and above, or is it possible that as new babies are born some of them will have old values at orange or below? 

Also, for areas like the middle east, you'll lose almost the entire population. As people start migrating and resettling these locations will they stay at green, or will they begin to regress if the environment is hostile? 

[zazen]

By our lower nature we are more stage orange and below. Of course, we have a higher diving nature and should go from the beast to the bhudda. By nature we may be beastly, but we are nurtured by society to the bhudda. If children are born into such a society they will be nurtured into their higher nature most likely. 

For our biology to catch up to our higher nature and evolve into it would probably takes thousands of years so that when children are born their biology only makes it easier and easier for them to live from their higher nature. For now, we are still mostly animal, and technology and the modern world only exposes this nature ever more to us. 

[snowyowl]

1 hour ago, Stovo said:

Would the world stay at green and above, or is it possible that as new babies are born some of them will have old values at orange or below? 

My (limited) understanding of this is that all babies are born as stage beige and we all need to progess from there. Have you spent time with a group of, say, 6-8 year olds, even in an orange community the kids are mostly purple/red at that age. So to keep a whole society at green would need a lot of ongoing development work imo. 

[BadHippie]

There is an interesting experiment - that was done by a famous German neurobiologist:

He basically took 6-month old babies and showed them different animations.
In one animation there is a "yellow-man" climbing up a steep mountain. A "green-man" is helping him climbing up.
In the second film the "yellow-man" is climbing up the mountain again, with the "green-man" trying to help again. But in this film there is a "blue-man" pushing down the "yellow-man". 
After watching these animations they are allowed to choose from two figures - a "green-man" and a "blue-man".
Every baby with 6-month chose the "green-man" - the helper.

Half a year later, he repeated the experiment with the same babies - now 1 year old. -> 10% of the babies now chose the "blue-man". 

He basically argues that those children "learned", in their environment (family), that someone enforced their own will, over someone else, and has success with it. That´s how the idea that "egoism" gives us faster success gets implanted in our heads.

This idea gets passed on from generation to generation, even though it isn´t inherent inside us and we could act differently. 

 

Just a different perspective Maybe it helps to answer your question.

He also argues that there are at least two inherent basic-needs in us. From the nine months in the womb, we learn that we are connected and allowed to grow at the same time.
Later, we constantly experience that these needs come into conflict. In infancy, this already begins. Mother or father may tell us how to be. At school we are supposed to perform and we cannot always live up to them.
In the worst case, we are punished. Such experiences hurt us in the truest sense of the word.

Edited September 16, 2021 by BadHippie
Spelling

[How to be wise]

@Stovo They will almost certainly remain in green. There’s no reason to regress downwards just because living conditions became harsh. Even green can deal with a difficult environment.