stevegan928

Logic Nation For Actualization

66 posts in this topic

3 hours ago, Leo Gura said:

I would never rely on logic to make important decisions. Intuition is far wiser.

When the decision has many variables intuition is better than linear thinking, but when I realize this that means I am using logic to determine which system should I use,   linear thinking or intuition.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, NTOgen said:

If you understand your emotions then you understand that you wouldn't want to be lead by them.

Yes, but I will not deny my emotions.

7 minutes ago, NTOgen said:

Direct consciousness transforms your being sothat logic loses its perceived validity or reliability or usefulness, and intuition/higher perception becomes the default

Your are talking about something I don't know (Transforming consciousness) so you maybe right but this is not useful to me unless I transformed my self. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, NTOgen said:

Yup.

And you don't know what I am taking about : Logic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't reject everything he says, but I know logic is a belief too. I am trying to be free from beliefs. So...

^_^


Don’t you realize that all of you together are the temple of God and that the Spirit of God lives in you?
1 Corinthians 3:16

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On a second thought, there's logic on the path to enlightenment. If you meditate you will be free from your thoughts.

Buddhism says = Meditate and be free. 

 

If you do this you get this result. 

 

That's logic too...


Don’t you realize that all of you together are the temple of God and that the Spirit of God lives in you?
1 Corinthians 3:16

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is interesting, I found it looking about the different kinds of logic:

Quote

Friedrich Nietzsche provides a strong example of the rejection of the usual basis of logic: his radical rejection of idealization led him to reject truth as a "... mobile army of metaphors, metonyms, and anthropomorphisms—in short ... metaphors which are worn out and without sensuous power; coins which have lost their pictures and now matter only as metal, no longer as coins." His rejection of truth did not lead him to reject the idea of either inference or logic completely, but rather suggested that "logic [came] into existence in man's head [out] of illogic, whose realm originally must have been immense. Innumerable beings who made inferences in a way different from ours perished". Thus there is the idea that logical inference has a use as a tool for human survival, but that its existence does not support the existence of truth, nor does it have a reality beyond the instrumental: "Logic, too, also rests on assumptions that do not correspond to anything in the real world".

 

Edited by abrakamowse

Don’t you realize that all of you together are the temple of God and that the Spirit of God lives in you?
1 Corinthians 3:16

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now