Quantum Mechanics Debunked

[Zeroguy]

On 11.8.2021. at 5:51 PM, Nahm said:

If it’s about how you arrive to an end, it’s a mental narrative, as there is neither. What you’re talking about isn’t scientific in actuality. It is the room, the body mind, etc, the whole or oneness of experience. What you’re referring to scientifically is literally you, “collapsing” (if you must), being experience. At it’s best, quantum mechanics serves as a pointer to a dreamboard, to realize and consciously play in, as, the actuality. 

A day, a hundred, a million years of scientific what answering, it doesn’t matter. ‘What’ is already a self referential thought. 

OK OK we get this bruh. 

Learning new words to not use m word all the time. 

Bro. Sounds cool. 

[RMQualtrough]

When not perceived an elephant or your own body looks the same as how infrared light flying round your room looks to you right now.

[RMQualtrough]

On 11/08/2021 at 11:19 AM, wildflower said:

Yeah that's more radical. Lot's of questions come to my mind, like the consistency of reality, why everytime we look the object isn't a different one etc, maybe you explain all this in a video?

The only thing I could possibly have to relate to what your saying is just when have strong trips, and consciousness collapsing back down into finite form, but I couldn't make any absolute ontological claims from these experiences.

Here's a drawing I did after a trip to explain the experience of being abstract potentiality (the outer part) collapsing back down and crystalizing to a single point of perception, it may be somewhat related to what your saying, but these things are hard to convey with words, thats why I tried to draw it

 

Why would it be different if the same awareness perceives it through the same mind? It is like asking why everything looks tinted orange when you put on orange sunglasses and not randomly blue or green.