Insight into the nature of pointers to truth -- Saying nothing

[The0Self]

Might already be obvious, but it's nice communicating it:

Something else other than the individual (all there is; no-thing) can hear that this appearance is inconceivable, and it’s obvious, and yet (no-thing pretends), the individual knows this while simultaneously believing and fantasizing/pretending that it is conceivable. That’s a description of the process, but the suggestion is there’s no process. All pointers to truth are just different ways of saying nothing at all.

The dream (unreality; what is not) is that you exist, there are things, and you can know them -- the truth in this statement is hidden by the fact that it says nothing, which is of course what truth is... i.e. it says the truth . Tragic.

It's actually beautifully tragic. For example: the statement "all is love" means nothing to someone who thinks that statement runs counter to their experience -- therefore it's a pointer to truth. If they expand their consciousness enough, that statement will perhaps say or mean something to them, at which point it's no longer a pointer to truth.

Whatever part of that meant something to you, does not point to what is true. Whatever part meant nothing, points to what is true.