Elimination Vs Compassion and Understanding

[Preety_India]

Literally everything in this world can come from a place of either elimination or compassion. Think about it.

Compassion will involve acceptance whereas a lack of compassion involves rejection and elimination 

Now the meta perspective here is of understanding. Learning the difference between  understanding, which is a superlative position compassion.  

Meanwhile you can always have and show compassion, sometimes something that is toxic needs to be carefully and consciously avoided

This basically means cultivating understanding. 

However understanding should not seep into needless and pointless justification but build over a solid foundation to bridge the gap between compassion and toxicity.

The elimination approach is very stage Orange. Based in Ego and Game A

The  acceptance approach is based in stage Turquoise and is Game B

 At the end of the day, the spirit wins over the ego.

Mind over matter 

 
 

[Preety_India]

And also when you shame something,  you're only shaming your own shadow.  

[EnlightenmentBlog]

Isn't this the fear VS love perspective. Elimination sounds like a facet of fear while compassion and understanding are possibilities of love.

[ivankiss]

Segregation ultimately leads to unity.

It's just two ways of (re)integrating - as you pointed out. Becoming whole and at peace.

Example A must push away an aspect, create a 'safe distance', maybe even ridicule and demonize it - until one day it inevitably recognizes 'the other side' as a part of itself and merges back with it.

Example B seems to already have the intuition or awareness of being One with the 'other side'. Or at least in the process of merging with it. It recognizes itself in the mirror - so to speak. Hence the heightened level of compassion and respect.

Both examples are leading to the same 'outcome'. It all comes down to what's relevant to the one going through the journey.