Posted December 14, 2020 So, I just found out, supreme court in Portugal, confirmed PCR being right in only 3% of the cases, government in my country will probably try to make vaccination a must, scientists all over the world are trying to show the other side of the coin but they are getting muted by governments, a scientist in my country said on the TV news that vaccination causes women not being able to have kids (I put that one weirdly, I know), 24 hours later he went on the same TV station and said he didn0t mean what he said. Some german lawyers and scientists are confirming basically all of the con theories. Goverments are acting like there is only one thruth, in my country everything that could reveal the other side of the coin gets deleted asap, some scientists are running out of their countries after telling people things that government isn't and if they stay they'll get killed or inprisoned. We are basically allowed to know only what governments tell us. in my country sharing "misinformation" can get you 15.000€ fine, average yearly salary for a normal person is 10-15k €... I mean to me it's obvious something isn't right there and it isn't Covid. My question, what can an average person do? Meditate and let it pass, do something about it... I mean I don't know, people aren't getting all the informations, how can anyone make right decission without having all of the info? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted December 14, 2020 1 hour ago, Alotofquestions said: in my country sharing "misinformation" can get you 15.000€ fine, average yearly salary for a normal person is 10-15k €... Nice. I wish that would exist in all countries. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted December 14, 2020 @Alotofquestions Focus on health and strengthening your immune system. Whether it's Covid or a dangerous vaccine you are worried about, don't forget your own power. "Finding your reason can be so deceiving, a subliminal place. I will not break, 'cause I've been riding the curves of these infinity words and so I'll be on my way. I will not stay. And it goes On and On, On and On" Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted December 15, 2020 Can feel you man, it really sucks. The key to putting this show to an end is civil disobedience, but good luck with that when the majority of the population are sheeple who believe anything the media says despite pretending to dislike the media. 18 hours ago, Blackhawk said: Nice. I wish that would exist in all countries. Your North Korean paradise is there >>>> Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted December 15, 2020 21 hours ago, Alotofquestions said: So, I just found out, supreme court in Portugal, confirmed PCR being right in only 3% of the cases, This is a misrepresentation of a science research published by Oxford Academic in late September. The research did not address test accuracy, it addressed the optimal number of PCR cycles to set as a contagion threshold for mandatory quarantines. The PCR tests are about 95% accurate and the authors spoke out about how their research was being misrepresented by the statement the tests are only 3% accurate. “The statement is false”, answers Vasco Barreto, a researcher at the Center for the Study of Chronic Diseases (Cedoc) of the Faculty of Medical Sciences of the Universidade Nova de Lisboa, who considers “irresponsibility” the way two magistrates of a higher court put into practice causes a scientifically validated diagnostic instrument. “PCR tests have a specificity and sensitivity greater than 95%. That is, in the overwhelming majority of cases they detect the virus that causes covid-19 ”. This is indicated in a scientific article that is cited in the judgment, but that is read “completely wrong” by the magistrates, according to Germano de Sousa, former President of the Ordem dos Médicos and owner of a network of laboratories. At stake is a study (“Correlation between 3790 qPCR positives samples and positive cell cultures including 1941 SARS-CoV-2 isolates”) Whose results were published by Oxford Academic in late September. The research investigated where to set threshold viral levels for risk of contagiousness, not the accuracy of tests “The proportion of samples that were no longer able to infect cells maintained in culture in the laboratory increased with the increase in the number of cycles required to obtain a positive signal. This is because after our body controls the infection there are fragments of the virus’s genetic material that persist and decrease over days, when the individual no longer poses a danger to others, ”explains Vasco Barreto. Conclusions like these have helped health authorities in different countries to reduce mandatory quarantine periods for those infected and to dispense with a negative test to “discharge” a patient. When making covid statements, please check your sources and interpretations so we can maintain high quality standards on the forum. Posting covid misinformation or misrepresentations on the forum is against the guidelines. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites