Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
QandC

There Is Hope for Science (This guy)

8 posts in this topic

 


- Enter your fear and you are free -

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Loved it, especially his admission that he doesn't believe in any theories, and the recognition of the possibility of an ultimate reality that is beyond human comprehension.


Just because God loves you doesn't mean it is going to shape the cosmos to suit you. God loves you so much that it will shape you to suit the cosmos.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The last minutes are great, but what if the physicists assume that consciousness is just a coincidence? Wouldn't that fit perfectly into their problem? But maybe that's almost as worse as unexplainable

Edited by Travelion

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He's a very smart guy, but his logic is a little flawed. He left physicality because it couldn't explain the evolutionary selection of consciousness, but he doesn't recognize that evolution could select for intelligence, which in turn produces consciousness, rather than selecting for consciousness itself.

He does recognize that the physicalists can't definitively explain why consciousness occurs in the first place. The epiphenomenalists have explanations for that though.

Like any good scientist, he refuses to indoctrinate his own, or any other, scientific theory. That is the beginning of wisdom. Unfortunately, it is also the end of wisdom, until he is willing to validate direct experience.


Just because God loves you doesn't mean it is going to shape the cosmos to suit you. God loves you so much that it will shape you to suit the cosmos.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
46 minutes ago, Moksha said:

He's a very smart guy, but his logic is a little flawed. He left physicality because it couldn't explain the evolutionary selection of consciousness, but he doesn't recognize that evolution could select for intelligence, which in turn produces consciousness, rather than selecting for consciousness itself.

He does recognize that the physicalists can't definitively explain why consciousness occurs in the first place. The epiphenomenalists have explanations for that though.

Like any good scientist, he refuses to indoctrinate his own, or any other, scientific theory. That is the beginning of wisdom. Unfortunately, it is also the end of wisdom, until he is willing to validate direct experience.

I'd say it's an auspicious sign that science and mysticism came full circle, not that it wasn't always that way in a sense. There is only ______.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, The0Self said:

I'd say it's an auspicious sign that science and mysticism came full circle, not that it wasn't always that way in a sense. There is only ______.

The ancient Eastern sages practiced spiritual science. The literal meaning of brahmavidya is "supreme science". It is the discipline of focusing intently and systematically on the contents of consciousness, and discarding everything impermanent as ultimately unreal. Their principle was neti, neti atma: "this is not the self; that is not the self." They peeled away identity, layer by layer, and found at the core the one irreducible reality: Consciousness itself.

This meets scientific standards, with one crucial exception. It cannot be externally observed and replicated. It can only be directly experienced.


Just because God loves you doesn't mean it is going to shape the cosmos to suit you. God loves you so much that it will shape you to suit the cosmos.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0