No need to click if feeling lazy : )

[Reciprocality]

I want naught achieved, only to have turned stones in solitude.

If achievement can be such a stone than I welcome it, but know its essence were the conclusion, NEVER the premise.

Among whom will I witness the divinity of mere stones, I dare call no name, for if I knew a name it would be a premise. This I can not deconstruct, for emotion is intra-human axioms.

It is those axioms and those only deconstruction were due to, and without which apathy emerges. Without which a soul asks only a minimum so to confirm his previous delusion.

..

To achieve means to corrupt all thoughts, to emphasize a the judge in one’s ethics. You say the judge is accidental, a mere means to which the achievement is the end. To which I answer: if that were not the case, how could you know, is it not eternally self-referential? Or even worse, how is there anything subjected to reference at all?

 

Think for a while, when last did you in relation to anything human avoid actions which came to your awareness by no will of your own, which appealed to nothing short of a judge outside?

And how many millions and millions more of those will there be? If ART could be cognitive, then would art not be the avoidance of adhering to ANY such judge? As opposed to the opposite, which we see in constructed aesthetics and its perfected material end?