Responsible guidelines or?

[Reciprocality]

Hello, i were looking at the guidelines for a little while only to come across this one "*No denial of enlightenment, awakening, spirituality, Love, God, or Consciousness. If you feel these things are not real, then this forum is just not for you." I assume it have been questioned and answered before but i hope to contribute with a new angle.

'Denial' just as 'lies' is categoricaly only possbile to the extent one is aware of the actuality of the matter at hand. You can henceforth not be denying the brightness of the sun if you were born blind even if you say its impossible there could ever be such a thing as brightness.

Most people are not aware of enligtenment non less experienced it for themselves, there is thereby (regarding those subjects and those only) nothing to deny, therefore i presume by the statement it is meant that if a moderator justifies the deletion of comments sceptical of the ontology behind god they can only to the extent they assumes deception in the individual as a premise? I for one would find that fair.

 

In any case i love theories and sensations streching my and others ability to reason, but that love will have a crippled leg if it can not fourish in an envirement in which also the sceptic can partake, now as the reader hopefully assumed this post is meant only to have an open minded discussion on the topic and with some luck a few responses from the moderators or the likes.

[kai0]

I think he means its not allowed to have a debunking attitude towards those topics as his philosophy is based on nearly a decade of contemplation so to leo those are like unshakeable truths that we should respect at least his efforts that he put to derive them