Angelo D

Buddhist criticism of beauty

28 posts in this topic

It seems the buddhist perspective is that the perception of beauty is a defilement based on delusion. Certainly this is not a commonly held opinion amongst most non-buddhist truth-seekers, who tend to see the perception of beauty as a high-consciousness thing. What it the proper conception of beauty? Is it fair to say appreciation is of higher-consciousness than the perception of beauty?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Never understood this one. The more I meditate the more beautiful everything becomes... was not my intention when I began the practice. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You'll find countless more apparent paradoxes like that when you insist on reconciling the dream with truth.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Angelo D said:

the buddhist perspective is that the perception of beauty is a defilement based on delusion.

Source???

This is a misunderstanding of Buddhism.


You are God. You are Truth. You are Love. You are Infinity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not a Buddhist, but yes, beauty is actually delusion related to survival, and survival is related to the ego, so yeah it makes sense.


If you have no confidence in yourself, you are twice defeated in the race of life. But with confidence you have won, even before you start.” -- Marcus Garvey

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, I found this quote from another source which seems to clear up the confusion for me:

"In Buddhism, beauty is an intrinsic quality of all things, not a subjective attribute restricted to a few. Seeing beauty subjectively values some beings or things over others, judging some to be more beautiful. Beauty, the Buddha taught, should not become the basis for individual likes or dislikes, as this leads to attachment—rather, we find joy in the beauty around us without attaching external value to it. Buddhism recognizes that all beings are part of a whole, and the whole is beautiful. Beauty is without any specific form, and in effect could be called formless, yet it also serves as a unifying force. Because all beings are interconnected, all beings have intrinsic beauty."

Source: http://what-when-how.com/love-in-world-religions/beauty-in-buddhism/#:~:text=Buddhism recognizes that all beings,all beings have intrinsic beauty.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, Gesundheit said:

I'm not a Buddhist, but yes, beauty is actually delusion related to survival, and survival is related to the ego, so yeah it makes sense.

Bro. No. Bro.


Intrinsic joy is revealed in the marriage of meaning and being.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So maybe it is that there is an intrinsic beauty in all things, but to say that one thing is more beautiful than another is something like a judgment and therefor false. 

So a pretty woman is not more beautiful, in truth, than a paperclip. 

Tell me if I understand.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Angelo D said:

So maybe it is that there is an intrinsic beauty in all things, but to say that one thing is more beautiful than another is something like a judgment and therefor false. 

So a pretty woman is not more beautiful, in truth, than a paperclip. 

Tell me if I understand.

You could think of it this way but it's still not full non-duality. The false judgement is merely one layer of deception, which may be obvious to a lot of people on the path. The other layer which is difficult to understand, is that the whole concept of beauty is illusory, like literally unreal.

In your direct experience, examine what beauty means and see for yourself. What does it actually really mean to say that something is beautiful (or ugly)? What does it add to, or remove from reality? Who's the one citing and passing these judgements?


If you have no confidence in yourself, you are twice defeated in the race of life. But with confidence you have won, even before you start.” -- Marcus Garvey

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Gesundheit There is Absolute Love and Absolute Beauty, and then there is relative love and relative beauty.


Intrinsic joy is revealed in the marriage of meaning and being.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Carl-Richard said:

@Gesundheit There is Absolute Love and Absolute Beauty, and then there is relative love and relative beauty.

Not true. Absolute cannot be love or beauty. It makes no sense to even say that it can.

Contemplate this question; how is absolute beauty different from absolute ugliness?

Edited by Gesundheit

If you have no confidence in yourself, you are twice defeated in the race of life. But with confidence you have won, even before you start.” -- Marcus Garvey

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Beauty is an Absolute. Free of the ego's biases, all of God's creation is seen to be Perfectly Beautiful.

Any serious Buddhist knows this.


You are God. You are Truth. You are Love. You are Infinity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Angelo D If you mean imaginary, then yes. All of reality is just imagination. 


"Not believing your own thoughts, you’re free from the primal desire: the thought that reality should be different than it is. You realise the wordless, the unthinkable. You understand that any mystery is only what you yourself have created. In fact, there’s no mystery. Everything is as clear as day. It’s simple, because there really isn’t anything. There’s only the story appearing now. And not even that.” — Byron Katie

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From my understanding of Buddhism, the perception of beauty is a defilement when applied to the opposite gender (or the same gender depending on your sexual persuasion). 

Since conventional Buddhists view lust and sexual gratification as strong, deep-rooted attachments (i.e impediments towards enlightenment), and the perception of beauty gives rise to these attachments, it can be seen why it is considered a defilement. 

This being the case, over the years Buddhists have devised practices for eradicating this defilement, such as “body contemplation” — whereby it is endeavoured to shine light on all the “not-so-beautiful” aspects of the body (blood, mucous, arteries, excretion etc.). 

Such practices, if carried on for long enough, are supposed to enable the practitioner to no longer perceive the body as beautiful, and thus no longer lust. And if this attachment can be overcome, it is believed, one of the most prominent barriers guarding enlightenment has been removed. 


 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Leo Gura I get it, anything that is created with the "lego bricks" is perfect.

But, is aesthetic ego based then? What about a master piece work of art?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, Ponder said:

From my understanding of Buddhism, the perception of beauty is a defilement when applied to the opposite gender (or the same gender depending on your sexual persuasion). 

Since conventional Buddhists view lust and sexual gratification as strong, deep-rooted attachments (i.e impediments towards enlightenment), and the perception of beauty gives rise to these attachments, it can be seen why it is considered a defilement. 

This being the case, over the years Buddhists have devised practices for eradicating this defilement, such as “body contemplation” — whereby it is endeavoured to shine light on all the “not-so-beautiful” aspects of the body (blood, mucous, arteries, excretion etc.). 

Such practices, if carried on for long enough, are supposed to enable the practitioner to no longer perceive the body as beautiful, and thus no longer lust. And if this attachment can be overcome, it is believed, one of the most prominent barriers guarding enlightenment has been removed. 

Yeah... no.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, mavelezm said:

@Leo Gura I get it, anything that is created with the "lego bricks" is perfect.

But, is aesthetic ego based then? What about a master piece work of art?

The natural awe and love we feel from beauty come from a deep recognition of God. Since God is all things, it includes aesthetic and every masterpiece. Absolute Beauty can indeed be found within these things just as it can be found within all things. However, people also tend to use aesthetics as a function of survival. For example, stage blue uses aesthetics to design churches and clergy uniforms to create a perception of holiness worthy of praise, worship, and faith. Stage orange will wear aesthetically pleasing outfits to make a good impression on people, or design aesthetically pleasing rooms and buildings to create an impression of professionalism, trust, or significance. Stage green may design an aesthetically pleasing healing center or therapy office to support client comfort and healing. Remember though, that even though we use beauty for survival, the essence of beauty cannot be separated from all that is. Hope this helps.

Edited by StripedGiraffe

Glory to God. Blessings to All. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, mavelezm said:

@Leo Gura

But, is aesthetic ego based then? What about a master piece work of art?

Beauty is an absolute, but the ego's job is to filter Infinity down to a limited, manageable, survivable level. Ego does this through biasing reality to suit its own needs and wants.

When the ego finds the master piece work of art beautiful, it is seeing through the clouds of its own selfishness to the absolute Beauty which permeates all of Creation. But the ego is so biased and limited in its vision that it falsely attributes this beauty to that one work of art. It doesn't realize that the wall on which the art hangs is just as beautiful and wondrous as the work of art itself.

Ego always sees partial truths, partial beauties, partial goodnesses. So it's not that the ego is wrong, per se, it's just always limited and partial.

It's like if I showed you a master piece work of art but your mind only focused on the face and missed the other 95% of the painting. You'd say, "That's a beautiful face! OMG!" Which is true. But you're still missing the other 95% of the beauty because your mind isn't open enough.

In this way the ego is never technically wrong. It's just highly partial and missing a lot of stuff.


You are God. You are Truth. You are Love. You are Infinity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now