richard dawkins

[Patrick Lynam]

I have to say that Richard Dawkins in this clip seems to be the most on point out of all these characters. I used to consider myself an atheist and used to follow these guys and my understanding has come along way and its interesting looking back on the things I used to watch with as if this was the cutting edge of truth. 

 

[Inliytened1]

@Patrick Lynam listen to Leo.  But do the work and discover directly.  These guys don't know shit about shit.

 

[Harmony342]

Same here! I used to look down on anyone who didn't pursue truth through science but I've come a very long way since then

[Nahm]

@Harmony342

“Neil’s” on point. “There really is no such thing as consciousness”.

[Nemo28]

7 minutes ago, Nahm said:

“Neil’s” on point. “There really is no such thing as consciousness”.

And you would aslo probably say "there is only This"

[Nahm]

@Nemo28

Not even. 

?

[zeroISinfinity]

1 hour ago, Nahm said:

@Harmony342

“Neil’s” on point. “There really is no such thing as consciousness”.

What da... Scientist? 

Diogenes was right all along. 

[Nahm]

@zeroISinfinity

“Scientist”...?

?

[zeroISinfinity]

9 minutes ago, Nahm said:

@zeroISinfinity

“Scientist”...?

?

Really wondered how he came up with that conclusion. Empiricism to da bone. 

Well it's only "thing" that exists. How he missed that? 

[zeroISinfinity]

Oh yes brain activity I forgot. 

[Nemo28]

1 hour ago, Nahm said:

@Nemo28

Not even. 

?

what do you mean? 

[Nahm]

2 hours ago, Nemo28 said:

And you would aslo probably say "there is only This"

Not even, as in there is no “this”. 

[AtheisticNonduality]

Daniel Dennett is another buffoon.

[Nemo28]

15 minutes ago, Nahm said:

Not even, as in there is no “this”. 

Youre refering to all inclusivness, saying something like "The Tao that can be spoken of is not the eternal dao" ?

[Nahm]

@Nemo28

No thing to include, no actuality of “inclusion”, Tao-less-ness.

[Nemo28]

1 hour ago, Nahm said:

No thing to include, no actuality of “inclusion”, Tao-less-ness.

basically you're saying "you cant stand outside of your experience" ? 

 

[Nahm]

@Nemo28

Experience appears to be yours, while you’re appearing to be experience. 

[zeroISinfinity]

1 minute ago, Nahm said:

@Nemo28

Experience appears to be yours, while you’re appearing to be experience. 

Truth summed up in one sentence. 

Aqua nailing it left and right. I love him. 

[Nemo28]

10 minutes ago, Nahm said:

Experience appears to be yours, while you’re appearing to be experience. 

The experience just appears, it creates infinite forms. And it all colapses into Me=Us. No?

[Johnny5]

@Nemo28 it means "Vast emptiness, nothing holy." -- Bodhidharma