This is mostly the same as a previous post I made, however I have removed the writing which presumably gave reason to lock the post. I see no valid reason to lock this post, so hopefully we can have some discussion this time and perhaps Leo can answer in a reasonable fashion.

Leo has mentioned in videos and comments on here that he had discovered a relatively unknown psychedelic which is more powerful than even 5-MeO-DMT. There seems to have not been much discussion of this lately based off of a few quick searches in the forum but previously we had people very curious to find out as you can see in this thread here: https://www.actualized.org/forum/topic/40418-lets-play-the-psychedelic-guessing-game-leos-new-psychedelic/#comment-506835 If this psychedelic is so great and powerful then I believe he surely has an ethical obligation to share it with people who are seeking awakening, truth, and generally trying to better themselves or their understanding of the world. It seems wrong to keep this from his followers who care passionately about this and it certainly seems wrong to have purposefully told us about it with the intention of not actually revealing it for a while. If he knew he wasn't going to reveal it for a while then he shouldn't have said anything at all unless he was trying to manipulate our curiosity. I present you with a few possibilities for why Leo won't tell us what this great psychedelic is: 1. Leo was lying about finding a new psychedelic and so he has nothing to tell us, hence his silence. He was lying in order to manipulate his followers into long term following for hope of the reveal which will never come. If this is the case, it seems unethical. 2. Leo was not lying about the discovery but is not telling us because he wants to drag it out in order to keep us hooked on following him. I think this is unlikely because it seems he has not mentioned it in a while, although perhaps I have missed this. This case seems unethical. 3. He is planning on telling us but is holding back because it is a topic lower on his list of videos to release. In this case he is holding back for the purpose of gaining viewers and excitement on the initial reveal which will help him business wise. Even if it is low on his priority list he could still easily have responded to the many people speculating and questioning him on it and have potentially helped them out by doing so, instead he gave vague responses and hints which felt rather manipulative. This case seems unethical. 4. He believes it to be a very dangerous psychedelic and so he is hesitant on telling people about it in case of causing harm, or perhaps it is an unethically sourced drug. In this case he should not have told people that he had some special new thing to tell people but that we all must wait for the great day that he finally tells us. He shouldn't have said anything at all. Or perhaps he should have released a statement about the danger of it in order to help people that still find it by themselves.  This case seems unethical.

What do you guys think? Am I missing anything? Can anyone think of a legitimate ethically sound reason to only hint at a new drug and yet not tell us what it is? Leo, can you please answer why you have hinted and yet are still holding back from the reveal?