Leo's newest video

[WaveInTheOcean]

Haha, Leo, I love you

Just listened to 20 minutes of his newest video "The Ultimate Structure Of Reality Explained" and he has never been more on point. So clear and straight to the point. I love it.

I also wanted to make this "topic" just to mention that what Leo is saying in his video, is exactly the same message that Alan Watts is communicating in this talk:
 

 
That it's all your doing. I can recommend just the first 44 minutes of this talk (listen to 1,5x speed, it's fine, if you're good in English), cos the first 44 minutes sums it all up pretty well: It's all your doing.
 

[SoonHei]

Beautiful video by Leo ❤️❤️❤️

[JD8]

Leo, but why do we, why does anything besides God exist? Around 54:00 you say that God creates all other selfs in order to have someone to share his love/amazement with. But that would be an egoistic motivation so to me it doesn't seem to explain it. Especially considering all the other stuff about selflessness that you discuss.

That's why I can't catch it here why is there anything in this world rather than just love itself?

Anyone can help with the answer?

 

[Leo Gura]

3 hours ago, JD8 said:

why do we, why does anything besides God exist?

Nothing exists besides God. You are it.

Quote

Around 54:00 you say that God creates all other selfs in order to have someone to share his love/amazement with. But that would be an egoistic motivation

No, this the most selfless motivation possible. It is pure Love: to give up your self so that everyone else could be selfish.

[WaveInTheOcean]

4 hours ago, JD8 said:

Leo, but why do we, why does anything besides God exist? Around 54:00 you say that God creates all other selfs in order to have someone to share his love/amazement with. But that would be an egoistic motivation so to me it doesn't seem to explain it. Especially considering all the other stuff about selflessness that you discuss.

That's why I can't catch it here why is there anything in this world rather than just love itself?

Anyone can help with the answer?

 

God is the most selfish "being" you can imagine. He wants nothing but Love to himself. That's selfish man.

 ...

but wait...

there are no other han himself to love...... nothing is outside Him.

So he got no other choice!

You see, your dualistic belief of selfishness and selflessness being opposites... it's wrong.

Selfishness and selflessness is one and the same thing. You can call it Selfishness, you can call it Selflessness. It's One. One. One. One. Oneness. Non-duality 101.

OF COURSE: Relatively  speaking, within the dream, selflessness and selfishness are indeed complete opposites for anyone not awake. And even for the dude's who awake, he can still pretend to talk about it as opposites, just to get people to follow the Loving/Conscious path.

Because of course: God is completely Selfless, and the complete unenligthened ego is completely selfish. Of course. I'm not denying that. I was just -above- talking about the Absolute Perspective, where everything is seen to be Oneness.

Edited June 14, 2020 by WaveInTheOcean

[allislove]

@Leo Gura bravo, feeling the deepening ?

[peachboy]

@Leo Gura

Thankyou so much for your latest video.

I have a quick question about something you mentioned and a paradox that I myself have been struggling with.

Within the context of the analogy of the vase and our perfect omniscient infinite singularity being at the center of a field, with the non-omniscient aspects being around the periphery.... does this imply that in all aspects (both omniscient and non-omniscient) we are subject to some degree of geo-spatiality? I'm familiar with the concept of Dimension Zero as a good way to reference non-duality, but how would that fit into a dimensional model with a center and a periphery? Or is this just a limitation of the analogy?

Another thing I've struggled with is a similar paradox of the omniscient infinite God seemingly existing under the authority of a time dimension. For example, we know that infinite consciousness is timeless consciousness,  yet the process of moving between the various states of non-omniscience up into the unified non-dualistic state would imply a certain animation.

Assuming God cycles between omniscience and non-omniscience as a kinda of eternal game, how does God do this without being under the authority of some kind of higher time dimension? (i.e Does God get bored of infinity and occasionally go on vacation into duality? If so, how long does it take for God to get bored?)

Aside that I've recently joined the forum and am really enjoying it.

Thanks.

 

[Leo Gura]

8 minutes ago, peachboy said:

Within the context of the analogy of the vase and our perfect omniscient infinite singularity being at the center of a field, with the non-omniscient aspects being around the periphery.... does this imply that in all aspects (both omniscient and non-omniscient) we are subject to some degree of geo-spatiality? I'm familiar with the concept of Dimension Zero as a good way to reference non-duality, but how would that fit into a dimensional model with a center and a periphery? Or is this just a limitation of the analogy?

Space in that model doesn't represent space, it represents Selflessness/Love/Consciousness.

Your separation from the Godhead is not a function of space or time, it's a function of lack of consciousness and Love, or fear.

Quote

Another thing I've struggled with is a similar paradox of the omniscient infinite God seemingly existing under the authority of a time dimension. For example, we know that infinite consciousness is timeless consciousness,  yet the process of moving between the various states of non-omniscience up into the unified non-dualistic state would imply a certain animation.

The Godhead is outside of time. Time is something the finite fragments of consciousness imagine as part of their material dream.

Quote

Assuming God cycles between omniscience and non-omniscience as a kinda of eternal game, how does God do this without being under the authority of some kind of higher time dimension?

The Godhead exists outside of time, Eternally. So the Godhead literally spends Eternity in its formless state. And then at any point in Eternity it can imagine time and thereby limit itself to some time-bound dimension.

Since God is unlimited, there is literally nothing preventing God from doing anything it wants instantaneously without a how. If God has to ask itself, "But how can I do this?" that would be a limit! The whole point is that when you realize you are God, you realize that no how is necessary.

[KingCrimson]

Admittedly, I felt like some of the videos on the nature of God/reality were becoming a bit repetitive lately. I've had profound psychedelic experiences  where I directly experienced what Leo was talking about, so watching a video about the subject felt a bit pointless since any description of these experiences pale in comparison to the real thing. Having said that, all of these the videos have still helped me tremendously to be able to better understand my experiences and all their implications.

This one, though. I don't know what was different. Came straight from the heart. Not that this hadn't been the case before, but for some reason I was particularly moved this time. I'll have to watch it again very soon. Thank you so much for all your effort, Leo. Words cannot describe my gratitude. 

[Loving Radiance]

@KingCrimson Second this.

I thought at first that this would be like the "What Is Reality?" video, but the model made it much more apparent how practical it is.