Is Police Brutality Love?

[SamueLSD]

1 hour ago, TrynaBeTurquoise said:

Leo "you ain't awake"

You would immediately change your mind and apologise if you experienced infinite love. 

The fact people argue the definition of Love is the biggest pointer to see if someone has experienced it or not. There is not other word. 

[Guest SirVladimir]

Imagine if preliminary camps were as cozy as a spiritual forum. Nobody would climb the Everest themselves.

[The observer]

3 hours ago, SamueLSD said:

You would immediately change your mind and apologise if you experienced infinite love. 

The fact people argue the definition of Love is the biggest pointer to see if someone has experienced it or not. There is not other word. 

You might as well kiss his feet. LMFAO.

7 hours ago, Carl-Richard said:

@Nak Khid 

Anyways, it's all just the classic relative-absolute fallacy: you're conflating relative love with absolute Love, relative God with absolute God. You may ask what does The Absolute have to do with Love or God? You'll have to discover that yourself through your own experience.

LMAO. You got it backwards.

[SamueLSD]

1 minute ago, The observer said:

You might as well kiss his feet. LMFAO.

I don't think Love is a 'he'.

But yes I would

[The observer]

@Leo Gura Like you're the one who's come up with this whole awakening thing. As far as I know, the concept was invented long before you were even born. I guess in the future, we're gonna require an official certificate from you. Otherwise, we ain't awake. Of course, no one's awake, even the Buddha, Jesus, Ralston, Sadhguru, Ramana, Krishna, and basically everyone else that disagrees with you. Only you. We're all evil devils. And you're the merciful God that's still putting up with our devilry, because you're all loving. I wonder why you would silence us then? Sounds like your creation sucks. You preach open-mindedness, and yet you seem like the most dogmatic and projecting one of all of us.

[mikelyons]

@The observer  When you're awake, it's obvious. When you're not, it's obvious.

But to people who are not, nothing is obvious, they are oblivious. Noise around the signal.
Anyone who's had an awakening just cringes at the lack of experience exhibited in posts like this.

When you see it, you'll shit brix <3

[Carl-Richard]

16 hours ago, The observer said:

LMAO. You got it backwards.

 I remember not long ago you said that typing "LMAO" is an indication of sarcasm. Does that apply now? 

Edited June 4, 2020 by Carl-Richard

[The observer]

15 minutes ago, mikelyons said:

@The observer  When you're awake, it's obvious. When you're not, it's obvious.

Don't worry about awakening. Worry about delusion. Even if what you're saying is true, then you should be more concerned about being deluded than about being awake. The problem here is of triple risk. The first is that you think you've got it. The second is that you don't get it. And the third is that you're spreading your delusion while convinced that it's not. Open your mind. You ain't awake. Awakening does not mean closed-mindedness. It doesn't have to do with finding the answers and arriving at conclusions. Awakening means infinity. There's no endpoint to it. Whatever answers you have today, tomorrow might bring you the opposite.

8 minutes ago, Carl-Richard said:

 I remember not long ago you said that typing "LMAO" is an indication of sarcasm. Does that apply now? 

Use your mind bro, please, for once.

Edited June 4, 2020 by The observer

[Carl-Richard]

37 minutes ago, The observer said:

Awakening does not mean closed-mindedness.

Hmm... would you consider this statement to be a statement of openmindedness? 

Edited June 4, 2020 by Carl-Richard

[Danioover9000]

@Nak Khid

On 2020-06-03 at 1:36 AM, Nak Khid said:

You confuse a lot of people, the way you switch a conventional meaning for "love" and your alternative meanings for love. 

Love is and English word
It's a human feeling ranging in:
caring for , preference for,  reverence for, acceptance for

and some animals have this feeling as well.  It is no less a feeling than hate, joy, boredom or fear.
The idea that the universe is love is a nice idea but it doesn't really mean anything. It is just semantics.
There are feelings in the universe but the universe is not comprised of feelings. 

Some of your  alternative meanings for love are:
 "love is absolute acceptance of everything " 
"love is the only thing that exists"  
"love is the actual building blocks of reality"
"Love is the substance of everything that is. , like atoms, Was Hitler made out of atoms any less due to killing people?
See? Atoms just don't care if you kill people or not."
"Love is too big to ever be understood by any human."
"The highest motivation is Love."

This all means the same thing right?
Of course not, it's all over the place.  One meaning is acceptance, another a motivation another the building blocks of reality" As if scientists describing atomic physics should switch to love particles.  As if love has nothing to do with human emotion.
If human emotion is assumed to be something lower , then why use one of the primary words describing a particular emotion, love ? 
If you want it to mean "everything" or "existence" or "consciousness" it only breeds confusion not to use those words and replace them with "love".  
Or you want to say you love everything, or love all beings that would be a clear thought but what you do is use try to change the meaning of the word, dehumanizing it and then re-humanizing it  very inconsistently and you are constantly switching it up in conversation and confusing people.   At one moment it's  "acceptance of everything" another it's an atom or the substance of everything.  
 You destroy love if you call it everything and start pointing out Hitler and police brutality are comprised of love.  
If the intent for love to mean "everything" or "part of everything"  why bother using the word love that is by definition a feeling and then at other times use the same word describing the feeling love "I love you" or reverence for God  etc?
That particular choice of word it raises sentiment or connotes affection  in people and then you constantly pull the rug out, bringing up Hitler,  rape, police brutality etc to try to say you are talking about a love higher than human understanding.   
That is violent. You commit a lot of violence with words. You open someone's heart and then stick a cold dagger in it

You do the same thing with the word "God" .  You use it in reverent ways but then switch and  remind people Hitler and rape is all part of it,  as if you as so powerful, that you created the universe you are above reproach, as if cruelty or torture goes on in what you created who is someone you created to question it? 

The "highest" form of love is indeed a human feeling. It's caring for other living beings. 
 That is a precious thing and you undermine that and try to remove the humanity from it.   
What you are doing is actually destroying love by doing that so becomes an empty shell of a word. 
Police brutality is part of life and unfortunate one, something that has the whole nation in distress.
A man has been suffocated 
Police brutality is not love and never will be.  Please stop these mindfucks, not now  It's spiritual violence 

 

 

 

 

 

   And This is your answer to your question. Similar to mine.