What if everyone is right?

[annonnimm32]

I like to thank the username The Don for given me the idea for this . Lets get right to it :

My first 3-4 lessons in philosophy and became reccuring in our study, very good teaching indeed is that two sides or many can be right with parallel or same arguments.  Its called a perfect tautology.  It can be induced but evan if its not the result is complete chaos.  It is why some choose to be wrong.  We cant accept the idea that every argument can prove both sides right.  Its how judges came to be to wrong one side and reward the other, because both sides are right, thus many juridical errors which i wont get into.  I want to talk about the invisible enemy : Since its called invisible and enemy you can call it Satan or Charlie you are all correct! And as well i am correct and many others who believe its a fake, a made up illness, its coocoo its bananas fake fake fake fake fake.  The first lie is with the invisibility : its clearly visible in patients : some already had pneumonia, others have panic attacks like symptoms but it is visible and made up.  Second lie is that regular doctors dont know what covid is they never studied at med school so its very hard and impossible to treat something you cant know for sure is real. Most talk about the body count and just that, yet when i ask my friends and family do you know someone with covid?  The painful answer is NO and this virus feeds on the many watching the news where doctors journalists and politicians spread wide panic though we caught them lying in the past ! Journalists and doctors have the body count and the proof some doctors gave them which we cant verify only trust cause we lack medicine knowledge . Seems we are all correct and this time no side can be proven wrong!  Both sides are valid and correct.  The result?  Chaos and diversion, distraction.  Something else is happening like enslavement laws like mushrooms after the rain because they can whip out a new virus and so goodbye our civil liberties!  WAKE UP PEOPLE!  GO OUTSIDE AND SMELL THE ROSES!  SHUT DOWN YOUR TV and NEWS APP! 

[The Don]

26 minutes ago, annonnimm32 said:

The painful answer is NO and this virus feeds on the many watching the news where doctors journalists and politicians spread wide panic though we caught them lying in the past !

I agree. Panic is not the ultimate answer.

[Jacobsrw]

@annonnimm32 This is a nice way to conceive of the human duality of perspective.

Human perspectives ought to have some varying truth to them since they are all perceiving the same thing and accounting for it from different angles. A human can only perceive from one angle at a time. In this sense, knowledge is contextual. We are accurate in what we see since we are limited to the angle we are seeing it.

Rather than assuming one is correct and one is not, it is more accurate to understand that each human perspective is correct but from a particular angle. Truth can be ascertained from the most deniable source. As all perspectives must in the end merge, since all derive from the same source and perceive the same source and thus, are explaining it form one of the many angles it can be explained by.

Oneness maintains that all perspectives are correct and incorrect simultaneously. A perspective is correct because it rests in the Absolute of Oneness, but it is incorrect in that it cannot not fully explain Oneness, since a part can never explain the whole.

Our current times only exemplify how two conflicting perspectives can be equally valuable.

Edited May 11, 2020 by Jacobsrw

[The observer]

3 hours ago, annonnimm32 said:

Most talk about the body count and just that, yet when i ask my friends and family do you know someone with covid?  The painful answer is NO.

You have to take into account the entire population of your country and of the globe. Currently, there are only over 4 million people confirmed with covid-19.

4 million out of 7 billion = 0.05%

That's in average, but it varies depending on your country. Let's take the USA,which has the highest number of cases:

1.37 million out of 328 million = 0.42%

So, statistically speaking; if you live in America, your chances of hearing of a confirmed case are quite low. You'd need a web of acquaintances of over 250 people be able to hear of one case. How many people do you contact regularly and how many people do they contact regularly? This  can massively affect the outcomes.

I've personally heard of two cases so far, and that was at the beginning of the lock-down. I've limited my contact so much during the lock-down, even online so I can't tell anymore.

[mandyjw]

What if everyone is right?

You ended up drawing your own conclusion in the end of this questioning, after saying that both sides are valid and correct, why is there a need to do even that? 

What if everyone is doing exactly what they need to do, and everyone is exactly as they should be? 

[Consept]

@The observer this point makes the most sense. You don't see everything or know someone involved in anything but it doesn't mean it doesn't exist. There have been wars, terrorist attacks, military coos, I don't really know anyone involved in them but I can't assert that they're not true, they may not be but until I go to these locations these things are happening in, I have no standing to make a claim like that. For now the second hand information, witnesses etc makes sense, so until something disproves it, I'll believe it. 

Similarly with this, you can't make a claim the virus doesn't exist until you've been to hospitals talked to doctors, patients, families. Then talked to scientists and virolgists working on this, looking at how it came about etc. If you want to sit in your house with no experience of this situation and assert that somethings not real, whist not accepting the evidence and also having no first hand experience of the situation, I'm sorry but the fuck are you talking about? 

2 sides of an argument is fine but it relies on you gathering information on each side both first and second hand and coming to a conclusion. 

BTW I know of 4 people who contracted it, 2 of which died ones in a coma. So is it only real until something like that happens to you? If you have unfounded assertions and encourage others to believe it, what happens if they believe you then go about spreading it? 

[The observer]

@Consept Exactly! Loved how you conveyed it all.