Mouthy Buddha on Child Exploitation

[Scholar]

 

[LaucherJunge]

Thank you for sharing, pretty sure it's gonna get censored though.

[Scholar]

It's interesting but we have to be careful. We could very easily spin a story that for example Leo is secretly a pedophile in disguise:

• Prior Actualized.org logo was the pedophile symbol with one line removed, same color, what are the odds?
• In one of his live enlightenment videos, Leo made comments about how he has been repressing his sexuality for a long time, and that that he accepts all to be Good with a captical G, he will finally pursuit those desires again, in the same video he made remarks about how conventionally evil things are Good and Perfection
• Leo has the symbols 666 in his livingroom where he was shooting the enlightenment videos
• Leo's past is unclear, he specifically keeps secret what his business was to accumilate the money that allowed him to pursuit actualized.org, in one of his videos, on morality I think, he specifically mentioned that morality will limit you especially in business, I think he even referred to how he himself has made these decisions to expand his business.

 

You could combine all of these things with concepts of False-Prophets and Anti-Christs, say Leo is the pedo-devil who seeks to turn us away from be path of God by confusing us about true Love. You could say his latest stick about him being unique and beyond all other teachers is specifically to confuse otherwise genuine followers of the path towards God so that he can delude us into the path of Satan. Something he has been planning for the beginning, or even something that the Devil himself has orchistrated completely outside of the awareness of the Leo entity.

 

Or you could be more down to earth and say that Leo changed on his path (as he even changed the logo) and turned around, now unable to ever disclose this particular part of himself because of the consequences it would have for his teachings, etc. etc.

 

You could spin all sorts of theories, and they might even seem convincing depending on your mind. But does this mean they are true?

 

Epistemology is very tricky.