5G Thread

[erik8lrl]

Seeing how much 5G is being talked about on the form, I want to have a thread where we can all post information we found. I think is good to post information on both sides of the theory so we can have a greater perspective. 

Here are some videos I found:

For the theory:

https://www.davidicke.com/article/567418/david-icke-live-london-real-today-330pm-uk

https://www.bitchute.com/video/ujqyiQO8TFc/

 

 

Against the theory:

 

[TrynaBeTurquoise]

A few high quality articles/podcasts:

https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/we-have-no-reason-to-believe-5g-is-safe/

https://bengreenfieldfitness.com/article/lifestyle-articles/emf/

https://bengreenfieldfitness.com/podcast/lifestyle-podcasts/5g-dangers/

[erik8lrl]

@TrynaBeTurquoise Nice

[wk197]

 

Stay home, stay safe. flatten the curve.

Edited April 9, 2020 by wk197

[erik8lrl]

@wk197 Great!

[erik8lrl]

Genomic epidemiology of novel coronavirus

https://nextstrain.org/ncov/global

 

This is really good

[k0ver]

"5g deployment exacerbate COVID-19" - case closed

Bonus: "Glyphosate (Monsanto) is linked to COVID-19" - guess what: there is no Monstanto in Iran (and no 5G).

Also, there is no advance health care in Iran either.

However, what they do have is a lot of mass burials due to COVID-19.

Go figure...

P.S.

"The horrible mass of books that keeps growing might lead to a fall back into barbarism.” - Gottfried Wilhelm, a prominent philosopher and mathematician of 17th century

P.S.2

"Vaccines weaken our immune system" - Dr. Andrew Kaufman (or whoever this "Dr." person is - I couldn't find any info about him anywhere on the Internet)

yeah, "the terrible vaccines" - they're literally killing us...

[Zanoni]

"An all-day symposium on 5G was held in Taos, New Mexico on Sunday, August 12, 2018. Arthur Firstenberg discussed the history, science, and description of 5G, including 5G from satellites in space, and its expected effects on all living things:

https://www.cellphonetaskforce.org/taos-new-mexico/"

[Commodent]

5G virus conspiracy theory fuelled by coordinated effort involving bot accounts, researchers say

"Jones said the campaign uses a strategy similar to Russia’s internet Research Agency, which was behind a disinformation campaign during the 2016 US presidential campaign. But he said he has not yet concluded that Russia, or any other government or organisation, is behind the effort."

I have personally noticed lots of bot accounts spreading conspiracy theories the last couple of days. Instability in the West is exactly what some agencies want, and by promoting them you are exasperating the problem. Be wary.

[Emotionalmosquito]

?

[DivineSoda]

10 hours ago, Commodent said:

5G virus conspiracy theory fuelled by coordinated effort involving bot accounts, researchers say

"Jones said the campaign uses a strategy similar to Russia’s internet Research Agency, which was behind a disinformation campaign during the 2016 US presidential campaign. But he said he has not yet concluded that Russia, or any other government or organisation, is behind the effort."

I have personally noticed lots of bot accounts spreading conspiracy theories the last couple of days. Instability in the West is exactly what some agencies want, and by promoting them you are exasperating the problem. Be wary.

Seriously, bots are everywhere. All sides. Be wary in general of that. 

[Commodent]

 

7 hours ago, DivineSoda said:

Seriously, bots are everywhere. All sides. Be wary in general of that. 

But here we have a documented trend, and I've never noticed it before to such an extent myself. Usually it's just dumb bots but this time it actually seems coordinated and quite intelligent. I really wouldn't dismiss this if I were you.

The most troubling thing is that these can be very hard to notice, and it was almost coincidental that I detected it myself. They seem almost authentic.

Also, what other "sides" are you talking about in this case? If there are other coordinated efforts going on, preferably documented, then I'm open to hear that.

[DivineSoda]

On 4/11/2020 at 5:25 AM, Commodent said:

 

But here we have a documented trend, and I've never noticed it before to such an extent myself. Usually it's just dumb bots but this time it actually seems coordinated and quite intelligent. I really wouldn't dismiss this if I were you.

The most troubling thing is that these can be very hard to notice, and it was almost coincidental that I detected it myself. They seem almost authentic.

Also, what other "sides" are you talking about in this case? If there are other coordinated efforts going on, preferably documented, then I'm open to hear that.

All sides meaning bots exist for all issues/debate one would want to manipulate online. There are also organizations that exist where you can hire a team of people to manipulate an online discussion on social media. 

I've been down this road before, where people would argue back and forth who carries the burden of proof. People usually maintain their original belief no matter what I show them. But anyway, here is just a 5 minute lazy search to show you what I mean. You'll have to dig deeper on your own: 

https://www.reddit.com/r/Keep_Track/comments/audtcs/compiled_list_known_instances_of_social_media/

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/jun/19/social-media-proganda-manipulating-public-opinion-bots-accounts-facebook-twitter

https://spectrum.ieee.org/computing/software/how-political-campaigns-weaponize-social-media-bots

https://internetofbusiness.com/propaganda-bots-social-media-manipulation/ 

https://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/news/releases/new-report-reveals-growing-threat-of-organised-social-media-manipulation-world-wide/

[DivineSoda]

This is a lot to digest, but seems like a good source for a more scientific evidence based documentation on the matter: https://web.archive.org/web/20191005230756/https://www.iaff.org/hs/Facts/CellTowerFinal.asp

[Commodent]

3 hours ago, DivineSoda said:

All sides meaning bots exist for all issues/debate one would want to manipulate online. There are also organizations that exist where you can hire a team of people to manipulate an online discussion on social media. 

I've been down this road before, where people would argue back and forth who carries the burden of proof. People usually maintain their original belief no matter what I show them. But anyway, here is just a 5 minute lazy search to show you what I mean. You'll have to dig deeper on your own:

Bots are indeed used by different intelligencies, but what does that have to with the point I was making? Even less invalidate it?

I just thought it was noteworthy that outside intelligencies are pushing conspiracy theories at the moment, not the fact that bots are a thing. Conspiracy theories lead to distrust in authorities and instability, which does not serve us at all in these times and why I'm giving people a heads-up to be wary of that connection. It is not without reason that outside intelligencies, seemingly Russia, are pushing such theories at the moment.

Normally I couldn't care less about conspiracy theories, but in these times it is absolutely crucial that we mantain stability.

Yeah, I've been there myself and that was not where I wanted to go. I was just inquiring, because in my view you were not really saying anything of substance. And also because I wondered if you might have detected some other ongoing trends that I had been ignorant of.